A POSSIBLE new high-speed rail line between London and Scotland, would run up the west coast via Manchester and Warrington, under plans outlined by Network Rail.
If the £34bn scheme comes to fruition, it could cut Manchester to London journey times down to just an hour and six minutes.
The rail infrastructure company's plans envisage new city centre terminal stations in Manchester, Birmingham, Glasgow, Edinburgh and London.
A precise route has not been outlined, but Network Rail says it could cope with up to 16 trains an hour to and from London, providing 9,100 seats an hour into the capital.
Today's announcement does not necessarily mean that a high speed line will be built however.
High Speed Two (HS2) a company set up by the government specifically to look at all the options, is set to publish its own report by the end of this year.
Network Rail says it is making all its work available to HS2 'to help it move quickly forward with its own very specific brief.'
Regions and cities including Manchester, that may be a part of the new high speed line have been actively campaigning for it to pass through their areas.
Fast service
Roger Jones, director of the North West Rail Campaign said: "High speed rail is gaining ground right across the world, because people can see that if you link all the major cities up with this kind of fast service, it does help."
Network Rail says its envisaged scheme would generate almost £55 billion of value, paying for itself almost twice over, but it says it could be ten years before it could become reality - even given eventual government backing.
It says it believes it would take up to five years to sort out the exact alignment of the route and all the planning stages, and that construction work could take another five years - or more.
Its plans would involve eight new stations, with 400 metre-long tunnels, and 32 bridges over motorways. New city centre terminals would be located close to existing city centre stations.
The proposed new line would become the country's second high speed rail link, after the line which runs from London St Pancras to the Channel Tunnel, used mainly by Eurostar.
Transport Secretary Lord Adonis says high speed rail links are vital for the future.
"Virtually ever other major developed country in the world has now built high speed lines" he said.
"And all of those that started building them between their major cities, have extended them now to cover large parts of their country."
Network Rail chief executive Iain Coucher said: "High speed rail can transform Britain. It can promote economic growth, regeneration and social inclusion.
"It is a low carbon option cutting domestic flights and taking cars and lorries off the road. It will release capacity on the existing rail network, and revolutionise passenger journeys.
Network Rail chief executive Iain Coucher
High speed rail can transform Britain. It can promote economic growth, regeneration and social inclusion
"Demand for rail travel is growing, and our main lines from the north to London are nearly full. By 2020, we will be turning away passengers. That's not what we want."
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 16 and replies | View All
Emjay See supporting City is not being able to wake from a dream that keeps getting better and bette (26/08/2009 at 10:53)
tiggerluc, somewhere in shaw (26/08/2009 at 11:12)
66bn is quite conservative.
Makes you think what Beeching was doing all those years ago when he ripped up all that trrack.
Salford_Lad, Salford (26/08/2009 at 11:31)
Anyway, this is a headline that should've been around about 15 years ago so that we are now starting to see the benefits of High Speed rail. Sadly it's not and we'll have to wait 10 years(which is another figure that seems too conservative to me - more like 15 knowing NR) to see the rewards.
Drew-Peacock, Our House (26/08/2009 at 12:35)
They'll spend it on something else in that there London like a new underground line to the Olympic site of the dome...We're still waiting for trams to go to the COMS, eight years after it was completed.
Public transport does not win votes, therefore it isn't a priority.
to the point, bury (26/08/2009 at 12:47)
Paul, South Manchester (26/08/2009 at 13:00)
J. Peasmold Gruntfuttock, King of Peasmouldia (26/08/2009 at 13:11)
Garsinho, Manchester (26/08/2009 at 13:21)
Al Capone of Atherton, Atherton (26/08/2009 at 14:51)
happy2behere, South Manchester (26/08/2009 at 14:58)
And what about all those billions they have spent upgrading the current London line ? do we just scrap that line now ?
One week we are told that there is not enough money to refurb Victoria station now we are told there is money to build a new terminal...who do you believe ?
What a bunch of .......
AdrianR, Warrington (26/08/2009 at 16:57)
Also currenlty the governments view is to make rail self financing through fares and they continue to reduce the subsidy (hence the RPI linked increases). This will be so expensive no one will use it.
If it costs say £50bn though that is the equivalent to 1 years tax raised from the motroist.
Cruella, Stockport (26/08/2009 at 19:00)
James, Nether Alderley (26/08/2009 at 20:11)
Guten Tag, Manchester (26/08/2009 at 20:40)
Crumpsall-Lass, Crumpsall (27/08/2009 at 21:17)
Horatio Dogsbody, Flixton (27/08/2009 at 21:47)