FOREST Bank prison is in the top 20 of the country's most overcrowded jails.
Ministry of Justice figures show that the Salford prison, has 1,149 inmates - 349 more than its operational capacity, putting it 19th in a list of England and Wales' most overcrowded prisons.
Nationally there are 8,865 more prisoners inside the prison system that it was designed to hold.
A total of 88 out of 140 jails, including Forest Bank, were over their Certified Normal Accommodation, defined as providing `decent' standards.
The figures were compiled by the Prison Reform Trust, which warned `sentence inflation' meant too many people were being locked up.
Pressure
Director Juliet Lyon said: "Pressure on public spending means that ministers can no longer afford to be complacent about prison overcrowding or the high reconviction rates it leads to. Simply building more prisons is an expensive dead end.
"The only way to reserve prison for serious and violent offenders is to cut out all unnecessary use of breach and remand and tackle sentence inflation and the growth of indeterminate punishments."
"Investment in prevention, treatment for addicts and mental healthcare would all pay dividends.
"After more than ten years of lurching from crisis to crisis it must be time for co-ordinated effort across departments and authoritative leadership."
Prisons can increase capacity by holding two prisoners in cells designed for one, or three in a two-person cell. Last month nine prisons were so full they reached their absolute capacity, beyond which they are unsafe. Forest Bank's overall capacity is 1,160.
A Ministry of Justice spokesperson refused to comment specifically on Forest Bank but said that they `will always provide enough prison places for serious and persistent offenders'.
They added: "The Government is pursuing an extensive building programme to expand the prison estate. "The vast majority of these places, almost 4,700, have been provided in new accommodation."
Tweet
Salford jail is one of most overcrowded
August 25, 2009

Showing comments 1 to 18 and replies | View All
Is It Me? (25/08/2009 at 12:20)
dessie, manchester (25/08/2009 at 12:23)
Guten Tag, Manchester (25/08/2009 at 13:49)
john davis, Broughton, Salford (25/08/2009 at 13:58)
Big Brother, North West (25/08/2009 at 14:34)
plus the chance of getting Luxuries in prison that they would not have otherwise got without committing offences is a big factor.
Lets face it - Britain is a joke when it comes to crime and justice!
John Quambo, salford (25/08/2009 at 14:53)
citycentre, manchester (25/08/2009 at 15:44)
A more useful way forward to be to send less people to prision, and allow the prison service to carry out its remit to rehabilitate, and prepare as many offenders as possible to re-enter mainstream society on release, rather that the presnt plan, of locking up more people, for longer (even though less crime is commited) and turning out prision hardened re-offenders
Daddy_Dead_Lift, Hyde (25/08/2009 at 16:01)
which as far as I'm concerned is just another way of saying we are going to continue to do naff all about this problem.
This country is full of highly paid useless bureaucrats like the above.
Supreme Being, Manchester. (25/08/2009 at 16:09)
We lost any respect when this country decided to abolish the death penalty. (Before I was even born). Since then we have struggled to control the criminal fraternity effectively. So much so that other nationals are choosing to come to this country to commit crime.
Yes we are a very soft touch, and it doesn't end with the justice system.
We need to toughen up now, most of us are honest people with morals, I look at the under 25's we have now and revisit Shameless. It's scary.
Britt/Canada (25/08/2009 at 18:48)
Sounds like the perfect solution until you or a member of your family are a victim of the a crime,,,the USA are building private prisons that have private security firms looking after them.Maybe Richard Cheneys GEO group (build & staff these prisons for profits) could advise on this issue.
John Quambo, salford (26/08/2009 at 01:07)
citycentre, manchester (26/08/2009 at 09:02)
"until you or a member of your family are a victim of the a crime" What information do you have to suggest I have not?
"Criminals don't get rehabilitated" Exactly, that is the problem, the prisions are too crowded and too many people are in them who shouldn't be, so politicians can pretend to be acting tough on crime, while not doing anything useful.
Once the mentally ill are properly treated, sensible drug laws implemented and petty drug users removed from jails the numbers should fall to a managable level, at which point some useful work can be done with the actual criminals who remain.
Better to have them serve their sentence, recieve some education and be able to contribute on thier release, rather than get stuck in the revolving door of overcrowded prisons, drugs and petty crime
Ronky, Bowker Vale (26/08/2009 at 11:58)
1) We build some more prisons, at a cost of lots to the taxpayer
2) We send less people to prison, at a cost of lots of cash and inconvenience to the future victims of the criminals
3) People decide not to commit crimes.
Which seems the easiest solution?
As for spending money on rehabilitation - how much does it cost to be told theft, violence, rape and driving without licence/insurance bad, not stealing, not commiting violence, not raping and not driving without licence/insurance good?
citycentre, manchester (26/08/2009 at 15:26)
Might work, but the prison population is already the highest it has been, and apparently crime is wosre, so the precedent is not good.
2) We send less people to prison, at a cost of lots of cash and inconvenience to the future victims of the criminals
Depends who we dont send to prison really, petty offenders on short sentences don't benefit anyone, drugs offenders could be better delat with elsewhere (if at all), the mentally ill probably shouldn't be in prison either
3) People decide not to commit crimes
Would be best, but seems unlikely, we could of course make less things illegal.
As to what it costs to simply tell people, no idea, but probably not much, it would cost more to equip people with the skills and confidence to be able to manage their lives better and avoid crime following a spell in prison, and for those it works with probably a lot less than just waiting 'till they re offend, arresting and jailing them again
Rob Wilson (28/08/2009 at 15:01)
Increase in population + increase in crime = increase in prisons
GENIUS.
Now get to it before its too late. Ah, but why would a political party who may not be here in 4 years want to do something to benefit us all if they may not receive credit for? Selfish politicians thinking of no-one but themselves. Spend the money, build the jails. Time is ticking and it isnt on our side.
Blue&Manc Manchester (04/09/2009 at 12:37)
PW, Manchester (04/09/2009 at 14:53)
-------------------------- -------------------------, ------------------------------------- (04/09/2009 at 17:13)