CHIEF constable Peter Fahy wants greater freedom for police forces to publish pictures of criminals on the run.
The Greater Manchester police chief was speaking after the M.E.N exposed how murder and rape suspects were among hundreds of wanted people who had gone on the run.
Powers
He said the breach of bail should be treated more seriously and police forces should be given greater powers to issue photographs of any offenders who are missing. Figures obtained by the MEN under the Freedom of Information Act show that 1,871 suspects are at large after failing to turn up at hearings. Chief Constable Peter Fahy added: "We give a high priority to locating those who have skipped bail and we carry out huge numbers of stop checks on those whom we suspect may be wanted using the new portable fingerprint devices.
"I would like to see breach of bail treated more seriously and more freedom for us to publish photographs of those who have gone missing." Further analysis of the figures we obtained reveals 212 of the 1,871 bail-jumpers at large at the end of June were wanted for category 'A' crimes including murder, rape, kidnap, arson, racist assaults, robbery, carjacking, drugs, guns and knife crime.
Missing
More than one-in-three of the bail-jumpers has been missing more than a year and one has managed to evade justice for 19 years. More than ten per cent have been missing for 'five years or longer'. Among them are men and women wanted for causing death by dangerous driving, having indecent photographs of children, making threats to kill, blackmail, false imprisonment, police assaults, rape, drugs and firearm offences.
Those currently on the run from Greater Manchester include: *Fitim Shabani, 23, a Kosovan from Cheetham Hill who was charged with causing grievous bodily harm with intent after a man was hit over the head with an axe in a Bury park last May. He failed to show up for the third day of his Bolton Crown Court trial in April. *Deryoush Vatandoust, 36, of Breightmet, Bolton, was charged with raping a woman in 2000. He failed to appear in court in Bolton in November 2001. *Trainee social worker Asif Amin, a 39-year-old, whose last known address was in Whalley Range, who is charged with rape, gross indecency and indecent assault against a 14-year-old girl while he was working at a Stockport care home in 2001. He failed to turn up at Stockport magistrates six years ago. *Frank Ashton, 58, of Oldham, who failed to turn up at court for robbery and sexual assault offences and has not been seen since November 12 last year. *Gary Lee Johnson a rapist from Urmston who was convicted in his absence after going on the run from a Minshull Street Crown Court trial three years ago. The 38-year-old attacked a woman after meeting her in a club in 2004.
Revelations
A victim support group also responded to the M.E.N revelations saying judges who grant bail to those accused of murder and rape are failing victims and putting the public at risk. Mrs Sheila Hannam-Andrews, of the Greater Manchester based Support After Murder and Manslaughter group, said: "I think it is disgusting. Why would anyone ever give a murderer or rapist bail? It is ridiculous. What happens if they kill or attack again while they are out, `sorry we made a mistake. Sorry that sex attacker targeted your little boy,' it's just not good enough. "And what about the victims they have already targeted, imagine how they must feel to know their attacker is on the streets.
"It is not good enough to say, 'I have to give them bail as this is their first offence and it is against their human rights to remand them in custody.' What about the human rights of their victims and potential victims?"
At the moment police are only allowed to publish the picture of someone who skips bail if they can prove they have exhausted every other avenue first. Officers argue they could be found much more quickly if their pictures were published straight away.
Tweet
Police chief calls for fugitive pictures
July 28, 2009
POWERS Chief Constable Peter Fahy

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
theface, City Centre (28/07/2009 at 10:07)
Because they have yet to be found guilty Mrs Hannam-Andrews, on those occasions the evidence must not have been strong enough to remand them.
hjk (28/07/2009 at 10:11)
john davis, Broughton, Salford (28/07/2009 at 10:35)
Zimmerman, manchester (28/07/2009 at 11:23)
citycentre, manchester (28/07/2009 at 11:53)
The Greater Manchester police chief was speaking after the M.E.N exposed how murder and rape suspects were among hundreds of wanted people who had gone on the run. "
Are they criminals, or suspects, or does no one care about the difference anymore?
The Watcher, Manchester (28/07/2009 at 12:14)
Hamish Macbeth, Whitefield (28/07/2009 at 12:44)
I suppose you could argue they are both. Having failed to answer bail they are almost certainly guilty of "failing to appear" at court at the time or as soon as they could afterwards - which is a criminal offence - regardless of whether they have committed or are later found guilty of the original offence.
Dennis the Menace, Hyde (28/07/2009 at 13:02)
THEY HAVE BEEN PLACED ON BAIL ... AND HAVE NOT RETURNED ..... DOES THAT NOT SAY SOMETHING ?????, OBVIOUSLY THEY WANT TO CONTINUE TO EVADE JUSTICE !!!! .... SO THEREFORE THEY ARE SURELY GUILTY OF SOMETHING !!!!!
and before "bleeding hearts" such as "city centre manchester" cries out ..."Are they criminals, or suspects, or does no one care about the difference anymore? .... THE ANSWER IS A RESOUNDING NO !!!!!
I think Zimmerman sums it up in his post !!!!!
What we want and what we need is the streets ridding of people who commit serious offences !!!!!
PW, Manchester (28/07/2009 at 13:08)
Black Flag (28/07/2009 at 13:14)
Not necessarily. The justice system isn't perfect. It's perfectly reasonable to fear being convicted of an offence you have been charged with even if you didn't commit it.
"Are they criminals, or suspects, or does no one care about the difference anymore? .... THE ANSWER IS A RESOUNDING NO !!!!!"
I really hope somebody makes a false accusation about you at some point.
Dennis the Menace, Hyde (28/07/2009 at 14:37)
"Not necessarily. The justice system isn't perfect. It's perfectly reasonable to fear being convicted of an offence you have been charged with even if you didn't commit it."
I really do not know what planet you are from .... reasonable to fear something you have been charged with even though you did not commit it ????????
Its obvious that you have never been the victim of a serious crime !!!!
No wonder the streets are full of criminals on the run with attitudes such as yours
And "thank you" for your comment about someone accusing me ...... I return the comment
Black Flag (28/07/2009 at 14:58)
I'm from planet Earth, which is inhabited by humans and as a species, we are fallible. We make mistakes, which has frequently resulted in miscarriages of justice. Things are obviously a little different on your planet.
"Its obvious that you have never been the victim of a serious crime !!!!"
If you want to throw silly ad hominem arguments around, I'll reply that you've obviously never been the victim of a miscarriage of justice.
Father Time, Elsewhere (28/07/2009 at 15:04)
Speaks John Davis, clearly a long term member of the Bar
Dennis the Menace, Hyde (28/07/2009 at 15:10)
Who is the odd one out I ask ?????????
citycentre, manchester (28/07/2009 at 15:18)
"or does no one care about the difference anymore? .... THE ANSWER IS A RESOUNDING NO !!!!! "
Thats good to know, if someone rings crimestoppers and accuses you of murder, you will be happy to do your sentence, or would you prefer and investigation and trial first?
Dennis the Menace, Hyde (28/07/2009 at 15:37)
I do seem to wonder that those who are vehemently against showing the fugitives identities may have something to hide themselves ?????, or could it be that their view of this is tainted from what they may have seen where they lived previosly ????
Black Flag (28/07/2009 at 15:44)
That tends to be the point of debate - people take it in turns to respond to each other's comments.
"read all of the previous posts and most do agree with my sentiments !!!!! Who is the odd one out I ask ?????????"
I'm more concerned about whether I'm right than whether I'm in the majority. I view the opinion one person who has shown continual evidence of brainpower, such as citycentre, as being a better indicator of that than a whole raft of commentors who have generally shown a total lack of intellectual horsepower.
Dennis the Menace, Hyde (28/07/2009 at 16:07)
"I'm more concerned about whether I'm right than whether I'm in the majority. I view the opinion one person who has shown continual evidence of brainpower, such as citycentre, as being a better indicator of that than a whole raft of commentors who have generally shown a total lack of intellectual horsepower"
In that case ........ may I refer you to the last paragraph of my previous post ...... your "intellectual horsepower" should help you find it .........
Black Flag (28/07/2009 at 16:20)
OK. Let's have a look:
"I do seem to wonder that those who are vehemently against showing the fugitives identities may have something to hide themselves ?????,"
Well, I've not said that I'm vehemently against showing the fugitives' indentities, so that part isn't relevant to me. In fact, as far as I can see, nobody who has commented has indicated that they are vehemently against showing the fugitives' indentities.
"or could it be that their view of this is tainted from what they may have seen where they lived previosly ????"
I don't understand what you are getting at there, but in any case, as per the last part of the comment, it doesn't apply to me.
So, what was your point?
The Allseeing Crystalchild (28/07/2009 at 16:21)
Brook Lands (28/07/2009 at 16:50)
citycentre, manchester (28/07/2009 at 17:22)
"In reply to "city centre" ......... I, unlike some others am a Law abiding citizen ..... What do I have to fear ?????? "
But as you already stated that you did not care about the difference between accused and convicted criminal, all we need do is wait for someone to accuse you, and off you go to jail, crime or not? Its what you said, not me.
mark quck (28/07/2009 at 20:35)
The breaking of the bail agreement is unlawful and perhaps after the police have visited the known addresses say twice then the picture could be put forward to the press.Perhaps with a bounty.
Theowolfe (29/07/2009 at 00:03)
It may be a nuance of language but it betrays the mindset of many of those in authority and the media, not to mention people of like mind to Dennis the menace.
Deejay, Bury (29/07/2009 at 07:52)