A CONVICTED terrorist claims he was offered a reduced jail term in return for dropping claims that British security agents colluded in his torture.
Rangzieb Ahmed, 33, claims officers from Greater Manchester Police and MI5 visited him in prison to try to persuade him to withdraw claims his fingernails were pulled out under interrogation in Pakistan.
In December, Ahmed, from Rochdale, became the first person in Britain to be convicted of directing terrorist activities and was jailed for life at Manchester Crown Court. He was found guilty of heading a three-man al-Qaida cell preparing to commit mass murder. He denies being a member of al-Qaida.
He claims to have been tortured in Pakistan, where he was detained, and has accused GMP of colluding in this.
However, senior security sources today blasted the whole story as 'utter rubbish'. Privately, anti-terror chiefs are outraged at the claims and say there is no conceivable reason why they would wish to make Ahmed change his story after convictiion.
His lawyer Tayab Ali said: "Mr Ahmed says a police officer and a man who described himself as a security services officer came into his cell in Manchester Prison and told him he could have a reduction in his sentence or a cash payment in return for dropping torture allegations."
GMP and the Home Office refute the allegations.
Guilty
Mr Ali said: "I've written to the Crown Prosecution Service asking them to disclose the identity of the officers who visited my client. If what Mr Ahmed says is true, the officers would be guilty of attempting to pervert the course of justice."
Ahmed was jailed along with Manchester taxi driver Habib Ahmed, who was found guilty of being a member of al-Qaida.
The Home Office said it did not comment on individual cases. A spokesman said: "Security service officers act within the law. The government unreservedly condemns the use of torture and works hard with its international partners to eradicate this abhorrent practice worldwide.
"The security and intelligence agencies do not participate in, solicit, encourage or condone the use of torture or inhumane or degrading treatment. For reasons both ethical and legal, their policy is not to carry out any action which they know would result in torture or inhuman or degrading treatment."
Greater Manchester Police refused to confirm or deny whether any of its officers had been to see Ahmed at the prison.
But Chief Supt Tony Porter, head of the North West Counter-Terrorism Unit, said: "The North West Counter Terrorism Unit does not participate in, solicit, encourage or condone the use of torture or inhumane or degrading treatment. For reasons both ethical and legal, their policy is not to carry out any action which they know would result in torture or inhuman or degrading treatment.
"The case of Rangzieb Ahmed has been heard in court. The judges considered the allegations of UK complicity in mistreatment and made clear that there was no evidence for this."
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Ace , manchester (07/07/2009 at 10:56)
Tezza, Tyldesley (07/07/2009 at 11:02)
Tezza, Tyldesley (07/07/2009 at 11:07)
All these people want is free publicity and papers just love to give it to them
dessie, manchester (07/07/2009 at 11:09)
Cavalier Jackson, Tameside (07/07/2009 at 11:31)
Herbert Sherbet, M40 (07/07/2009 at 11:40)
Guten Tag, Manchester (07/07/2009 at 11:40)
Elliott Pest, Newton, Nr. Hyde. (07/07/2009 at 12:06)
Bejjy ex Salford now Malta, Malta (07/07/2009 at 12:17)
Henry Kelly, Ireland (07/07/2009 at 12:29)
Dr Armadillo (07/07/2009 at 12:31)
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead (07/07/2009 at 12:53)
Bejjy ex Salford now Malta, Malta"
I agree! if we didn't have this gravy train for lawyers and made them commit to pay for themselves if they lose, half wouldn't bother taking the risk but they win whether their client does or not. They're like MP's going for as much as they can and why not? Cherie Blair was championing every lost cause going.
citycentre, manchester (07/07/2009 at 13:19)
Elliott Pest "I personally couldn't care less about his rights, he doesn't have any rights at all." which is a shame, as his rights are also your rights
Blip, Manchester (07/07/2009 at 13:35)
Mr Wiskas, Swine Town (07/07/2009 at 14:01)
Elliott Pest, Newton, Nr. Hyde. (07/07/2009 at 14:43)
Don't class me with the likes of scum like him ...i'll repeat "he doesn't have rights"
The Higher Openshaw Exile, MANCHESTER (07/07/2009 at 14:46)
red one (07/07/2009 at 14:59)
7/07/2009 at 10:56
Ace spot on. The terrorist organisations are decapitating people, taking hostages and killing them in cold blood. Our soldiers only have to look at these scum in a funny way and they are investigated. If this animal had captured a British soldier and wanted information what would he have done to get it!!
citycentre, manchester (07/07/2009 at 15:07)
"Don't class me with the likes of scum like him " i didnt, but pointed out that whatever rights he does nor does not enjoy so do you and i; if he can be totrured by agents of the state, then so can we. better to protest now, that after we are taken away in the night for "interogation" don't you think?
Ace , manchester (07/07/2009 at 15:35)
JoeStalin,Gorton (07/07/2009 at 16:21)
Elliott Pest, Newton, Nr. Hyde. (07/07/2009 at 16:21)
Sounds very much like you are a sympathiser of his terrorist activities, are you by any chance a member of the great unwashed?
His human rights ceased as soon as he took to his ways and activities.
Free Red, Manchester (07/07/2009 at 16:28)
He was found guilty, therefore, he lied about being a member of al-Qaida. Without corroborating evidence from someone with integrity nobody outside his circle of low life scumbags will ever take him seriously even if his allegations were true. As ye sow...
Laura Norder, Didsbury (07/07/2009 at 16:29)
I wonder if the Islamabad Evening News(incorporating the Goat Herder's Gazette), will be running this piece... somehow I doubt it.
Sienna Pod, Cheetham Hill (07/07/2009 at 16:32)