THESE are dark days indeed. The north west awoke on Monday to discover it had elected Nick Griffin, leader of the far-right BNP, to one of its eight seats in the European Parliament.
A man whose party only accepts white members. A man whose last general election manifesto expressed a desire to push Asian and Black Britons out of their homeland.
A man with a criminal conviction for distributing material likely to incite racial hatred.
These are unpalatable truths. It is understandable then, that the decent majority are this morning looking for someone to blame.
Is it Gordon Brown's fault? Is it the fault of Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs? No.
Their voters may have stayed at home in large numbers, but politics is not like football. You don't have to always support the same team.
Angry
A lifelong Labour voter angry at what's been happening in Westminster would have been infinitely better served switching to a different, credible, party. That would have sent a message. As Edmund Burke famously said, "All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing." Abstaining is doing just that: nothing. It served no purpose but to open the back door to Griffin and his ilk.
Was it the system of proportional representation? No. The rules were the same for everyone. They have been used before with no complaints - and no BNP Euro-MPs. There is an appetite in our country for more proportional voting, not less - and rightly so.
The BNP still needed to get nearly 10 per cent of the vote to get a seat. The problem wasn't the threshold. The problem was that they had enough support to reach it, and not enough people trying to stop them.
Was it other parts of the north west `super-constituency' - in Burnley, for example, or Merseyside - that boosted the BNP vote? Again, no. The struggle for the eighth and final seat in our region came down to a straight fight between the BNP and the Green party.
In seven out of 10 boroughs in Greater Manchester - Wigan, Tameside, Salford, Rochdale, Oldham, Bury and Bolton - we preferred to vote for a party that stands for racial division rather than a party that wants to build more windfarms. Either that, or we just didn't bother to choose.
So was it finally, the fault of the MEN - giving the oxygen of publicity to Griffin by exposing him and his odious party? No. All we did was to put information, culled chiefly from the BNP's own manifestos, into the public domain. Not oxygen, then, but the poisonous cloud that the party has carried round with it since it was born of the neo-Nazi National Front.
Unpalatable
The unpalatable truth is that there is, among our number, a small but significant percentage who share Griffin's vile views. Of the rest of us, a huge number cared so little about this threat that we were not even prepared to vote for someone else.
The problem with democracy is that it is utterly transparent. All the facts and figures are there. Every valid vote is counted and written down in black and white.
What history will show, then, is that 9.12 per cent of votes in Greater Manchester - and 8.0 per cent across the north west - were cast for the BNP. Even though the overall turnout of 31.9 per cent meant only 2.5 per cent of adults voted for the party, it was enough to win a seat - and with it around £1m of taxpayers' money, and an international platform to air their views.
In a democracy, you always get the politicians you deserve. You and I have no one to blame but ourselves. The north west of England will now be known across Europe as a place where the BNP took root. The decent majority have allowed an indecent thing to happen.
We can only hope that this will serve as a wake-up call. That people will realise exactly why our vote is so precious; why people fought and died to secure it. We can only hope that Griffin, given such a platform, will expose himself and his party for what they really are. There is no guarantee that will happen. We had our chance to act; we did not. Now we can only watch and wait. That is the price of apathy.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Chris R, Irlam (09/06/2009 at 11:37)
The BNP have obviously struck a chord with certain sections of the electorate....instead of lamenting this fact why not try to find out WHY people felt compelled to vote BNP rather than any of the alternatives!
Mark, South Manchester (09/06/2009 at 11:50)
And even though the national media did its best to keep it quiet (up until a month ago) - Londoners elected a BNP politician to their London Assembly last year too. Not to mention the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham - BNP's largest UK council stronghold. (Again ignored by the national media, who prefer to tell us about Burnley & the North.)
Then there's the oh so liberal Netherlands - where their fascist right wing party actually came second nationally.
So come on David, less of this uptight, middleclass self pity - don't give up on the North West, because actually 90% of us didn't vote for the damn BNP!!!
Jay B, oldham (09/06/2009 at 12:03)
the public have been let down on so many things! target our own government on their failings! make them realise they've let us down!
like all the touchy subjects on immegration, the welfare state! the poor services we have, the mess of their own mp's.
Whoever deals with these problems will win the majority of votes out there!
at the momment it seems to be just the BNP who even talk about it!
Black Flag (09/06/2009 at 12:18)
Angie33 , Manchester (09/06/2009 at 12:29)
citycentre, manchester (09/06/2009 at 12:33)
Mr Manchester (09/06/2009 at 12:43)
But I still feel disappointed that the BNP are now representing our region on the European stage.
Fozz, (09/06/2009 at 12:54)
................
Opinion : member of the public and MEN reader
not allowed one
Rammylad (09/06/2009 at 13:08)
Chris R, Irlam (09/06/2009 at 14:16)
Too true citycentre, it makes me shudder when I hear career politicians making noises supporting this way of thinking. Politicians - Instead of talking of banning us from voting for the BNP & suchlike why not take a long hard look at yourselves & give us more reasons not to vote for them?
jordy, Middleton (09/06/2009 at 15:20)
Justified True Belief , - ... (09/06/2009 at 15:51)
So I found myself having to answer the question which of these do I dislike the least (double negative).
What a puerile sound-bite to say “In a democracy, you always get the politicians you deserve”. It is fundamentally a false premise, how would anyone vote when offered the choice of Stallin or Pol Pot?
In a real democracy we would be given the choice of “Non of the above”, this would allow people to register dissatisfaction and maybe force alternative solutions to be found. I am not sure what the alternative is, but the current system perpetuating the “big three”, which allowed a party to win power, while only polling 20% of the vote, seems archaic in the 21st Century.
Bill of Bury, Lancashire (09/06/2009 at 16:06)
Andy2, Manchester (09/06/2009 at 16:09)
1970, hell (09/06/2009 at 16:14)
Rammylad (09/06/2009 at 16:18)
Black Flag (09/06/2009 at 16:19)
I find all the talk of having a "none of the above" option to be childish. If people are so strongly opposed to the candidates that are avaiable, they should stand themselves. If people aren't happy with what's on offer but can't be bothered to present an alternative themselves, then they don't deserve to be heard.
la source de sagesse, Manchester (09/06/2009 at 16:20)
Justified True Belief , - ... (09/06/2009 at 16:37)
I will use myself as an example: -
I have a Engineering degree and a Masters in business, I enjoy what I do, I am reasonably well paid and judging by others I am good at my job. My current skills, experience and status are a result of over 20 years hard work in the Engineering industry. So I should give all this up, placing my family in to a potentially precarious financial situation.
Then I should embark on a career that, I do not know if I am suited for, do not know if I will enjoy, do not know if I am any good at!!!. Now that would be beyond childish, it would be irresponsible.
Just because I don’t like what’s offered currently, doesn’t mean I can’t agitate for something better, Its called evolution.
richard aylett, ashton in makerfield (09/06/2009 at 16:59)
(how dare they)
Black Flag (09/06/2009 at 17:04)
What a pitiful attitude. We live in the birth place of the co-operative movement, which came about because people didn't like the situation they were in and decided to take some personal responsibility and work to change things, rather than sitting back and expecting somebody else to do it for them.
"So I should give all this up, placing my family in to a potentially precarious financial situation"
Plenty of people who go into politics do just that. That's the difference between someone who just whinges and someone who actually tries to make a difference.
"Just because I don’t like what’s offered currently, doesn’t mean I can’t agitate for something better, Its called evolution."
And the best you can suggest is to do that is to be given an opportunity to do some non-specific moaning? Do you really think the way to make things better is to be given the opportunity to go into a polling booth and put a cross in a box which essentially says 'I don't like what's on offer, but I'm not going to say what I do want and I'm not going to make any personal effort to provide a better option.'
zarquon, bramhall (09/06/2009 at 18:02)
It pays from £21,500...who says multiculturalism is a bad thing?
steve wilson (09/06/2009 at 18:27)
Andanotherthing, Mcr (09/06/2009 at 18:51)
Rowlands , manchester (09/06/2009 at 20:11)
It is rich of David Ottewell to talk of 'indisputible' facts when the M.E.N will not allow the BNP and its supporters to dispute the many distortions and untruths levelled against them in this newspaper.