A POLICEMAN refused to sit on a bike for a publicity photograph - because he hadn't passed his cycling proficiency test.
Pc Tony Cobban said health and safety red tape laid down by his bosses meant he could not even sit on a stationary bike for the photo.
Lancashire police say any officer who hasn't passed the exam, based on the course taken by thousands of schoolchildren every year, is banned from using a cycle until they do.
But that decision has been slammed as being politically correct - by its own authority.
David Whipp, a member of Lancashire Police Authority, said: "I think it's one of these PC-gone-mad things over Pcs on bikes.
"I think having coppers on duty on bikes is great.
"I think the balance on health and safety is probably right but there may be one or two occasions where you raise your eyebrows."
Slammed
Coun Geoff Driver, Conservative group leader for Lancashire County council, said: "You are winding me up.
"The mind boggles when a grown man can't go on a bike for a photograph. When I hear stories like this I just think what on earth is going on?"
Pc Cobban, a community officer in Preston, said: "It was basically a health and safety thing. I was just being cautious as I haven't passed the cycling proficiency test.
"My personal view would be concern if anything happens to me while on the bike and it hasn't been risk assessed or insured - in this day and age you have to cover all bases. It's the way of the world.
"I could get on the bike but I'm not massively proficient."
Safety
And Insp Nick Emmett said: "Our officers are required to be appropriately trained and assessed prior to using bikes for patrolling in order to comply with insurance and for the safety of themselves and the public.
"An increasing number of our neighbourhood officers do patrol their wards on bikes and their communities have welcomed this due to their increased effectiveness and visibility."
The force said the cycling proficiency exam they use is a modified version of tests taken by youngsters learning to ride bikes.
But it is 'police specific', using in-house instructors issuing extra guidance such as how to use police radios while cycling.
PCSO Emma Nixon - who HAS passed her test - stepped in to pose for the picture.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Jay B, oldham (06/05/2009 at 10:30)
Acid, Chadderton (06/05/2009 at 10:33)
Frostee, Oldham (06/05/2009 at 11:13)
Frostee, Oldham (06/05/2009 at 11:29)
Ali Malik, Cheetham Hll (06/05/2009 at 12:26)
sneakitawc (06/05/2009 at 12:31)
Mr Manchester (06/05/2009 at 13:22)
Phil L, Denton (06/05/2009 at 14:21)
Pavement Cycling, like Bus Stop blocking, is a "100% tolerance" crime, because the potential victims have no political power.
Jay B, oldham (06/05/2009 at 15:03)
a PCSO has actually done something for once!!
hooray!! we're finially get something for our money!!
Piccadilly Dog, Beswick (06/05/2009 at 15:54)
FYI, parts of the A635 Fairfield St/Ashton Old Road are now legally 'mixed-use' (shared pedestrian/cyclist), so cyclists can use the pavement, because there are no 'CYCLISTS DISMOUNT' signs up. Manchester City Council signage (like Victoria Station) strikes again?
Ms B, Manchester (06/05/2009 at 15:57)
..........Jessies!
Jay B, oldham (06/05/2009 at 16:35)
the poor cyclists suffer for this too.
its about time we started standing up to our local councils and government on all these pointless uselles things they keep forcing upon us.
these bus lanes cause the congestion that they then told us needed to be addressed with the con tax!
we where not fooled with that trick!
Phil L, Denton (06/05/2009 at 17:11)
The Fairfield Street bus lane ISN'T a bus lane - its a taxi rank - and the sections of pavement I'm talking about are NOT signposted for shared use.
FWIW, the problem is greater on London Road than Fairfield Street, its just the two examples I witnessed immediately before reading this article weren't on London Road!
As for the "I pay my taxes as a motorist diatribe". You never listen to the other side. Virtually, all the public money that goes into "public" transport, goes on Rail. The vast majority of people can only reach rail with a car (or a bike!), so non motorists are dependant on private investment. Oh! And Diesel trains aren't subject to fuel tax, but buses are! And why did I say BTP (British Transport Police) was a misnomer - because they only cover Rail. Bus passengers have no protection from crimes. Hence, throwing an orange carton at a motorist warrants a 9 month sentence, but throwing a lump of concrete at a bus (note, the media don't acknowledge the existance of passengers - just vehicles - when referring to missile attacks........or bus lanes, come to that), only warrants a Caution.
Chris (06/05/2009 at 19:01)
PW, Manchester (06/05/2009 at 19:25)
Ian (06/05/2009 at 20:19)
Acid, Chadderton (06/05/2009 at 22:46)
CorneredAllTheLuck, Tameside (07/05/2009 at 01:41)
Jay B, oldham (07/05/2009 at 10:22)
bus lanes are to blame for one thing only! congestion. like you say they are ill thought out. if they want to introduce them they should be an extension of the road, not replacing a lane and not making traffic have to merge in.
we've got on up in oldham which was planned as one bus lane and two normal lanes and what did we get. just one normal lane and one bus lane.
now they've built a massive tesco's next to it and a new junction and its just gridlock now.
why is it as soon as competant people get into council departments and government they seem to loose all common sense and brain function?
Frequent Flyer, Altrincham (07/05/2009 at 15:37)
NickS (08/05/2009 at 19:54)
Your havin a laugh, Tameside (09/05/2009 at 07:07)
zarquon, bramhall (09/05/2009 at 10:26)
Reminds me of the vicious keep left signs or the marauding old ladies beating up youths with walking sticks in monty python hahahahaha
Acid, Chadderton (09/05/2009 at 23:49)
Hamish Macbeth, Whitefield (11/05/2009 at 07:14)
Even the bosses fell for it - by having to back him up!