AIRLINE pilots will resist the ID card scheme 'with all legal means possible', according to their union Balpa.
The scheme is to be trialled at Manchester and London City Airports but Balpa said its members were overwhelmingly against it.
ID cards latest
Balpa general secretary Jim McAuslan said the scheme was not voluntary as pilots had learned that they would not get a pass to go to the through-security airside part of an airport without having an ID card.
"This is coercion and a case of Big Brother knows best," he added.
On The Guardian website, Mr McAuslan went on: "Our members are overwhelmingly against the Government's national ID card scheme trials for pilots and other airside workers, and we will resist the card with all legal means possible.
"Our members believed the Government promise that the ID card would be voluntary, but they now know it is anything but. Our members must have an airside pass to operate aircraft and now discover that to get that pass they must have a national ID card.
"They are told 'You don't actually have to have one' but no card equals no pass, which equals no job. This is coercion and, by trialling the scheme in Manchester and London City Airports, the Government is clearly attempting to isolate pockets of resistance."
Mr McAuslan continued: "Our members see the regular stories of Government data going missing or falling into the wrong hands. Like every other citizen, they ask themselves what will happen to the data they are coerced into providing; whether it will it be safe, whose hands might it fall into, and what might they do with the data?
"Yes, there have been lots of reassuring noises, but frankly we don't believe them. Our members, who aim to be the ultimate professionals, increasingly have a sense that a line is being crossed in the relationship between state and citizen; a sense that Big Brother knows best."
An Identity and Passport Service spokesman said: "The Government remains committed to working in close partnership with the aviation industry and trade unions to introduce identity cards for airside workers.
"Balpa have come to us with their concerns and we have spoken to them a number of times about how we can work with industry to resolve these."
The spokesman continued: "Identity cards will directly benefit airside workers - not just by improving personnel security, but also by speeding up pre-employment checks and increasing the efficiency of pass issuing arrangements, making it easier for these workers to take up their posts and move from one airside job to another.
"Identity cards will be mandatory for all airside workers, just as other pre-employment checks are today, so that the benefits from the scheme can be realised across the aviation sector. We will work with each airport to agree exactly which employees would initially be subject to this requirement and how it would best be integrated into the pre-employment checking and pass issuing arrangements at that airport."
Tweet
Pilots to boycott ID trial
May 05, 2009
Pilots at Manchester Airport will boycott the scheme

Showing comments 1 to 23 and replies | View All
The stinking kipper, pinned under the table (05/05/2009 at 15:46)
Mark,Radcliffe. (05/05/2009 at 15:56)
JoeStalin,Gorton (05/05/2009 at 16:03)
Ace Shakespeare , manchester (05/05/2009 at 16:08)
Black Flag (05/05/2009 at 16:19)
So you've now become such a megalomaniac that you think you can speak on behalf of all of us? You need help.
I'm very grateful to the pilots for making this and also relieved that the government chose a guinea pig group that has the guts to stand up to them.
citycentre, manchester (05/05/2009 at 16:43)
"Why wouldnt the pilots want the ID card,have some of them something to hide" because they know it will have no major effect on security, but serves only to make us more answerable to government?
"We the public demand these pilots should be security checked and carry the ID card" no we dont, you might but you do not speak for everyone
"Aircraft are the favoured tool for terrorist 'spectactulars'" are they, I can think of one attack that used them, and some failed attempts to take them over; none however commited by pilots of other airside checked staff, so none that this measure would have made the slightest difference to.
Cars, trains and other senstitve equipment like mobile phones and rucksacks have been used more than planes, so unless it is intended to forse us all to have these cards at a cost of some 15 billion pounds (how much actuall security could at pay for?) they are of no use.
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead (05/05/2009 at 16:46)
I know which way I feel on the ID cards as I have nothing to hide
JoeStalin,Gorton (05/05/2009 at 16:48)
Black Flag (05/05/2009 at 16:54)
Oh, that makes it alright then!
If you think the only reason someone would want to protect their privacy is if they've done something wrong, why are you using a pseudonym?
Chris Green, Chorlton-cum-Hardy (05/05/2009 at 17:17)
Current anti-terror legislation has been used: against Walter Wolfgang just because he was heckling; for surveillance to fine people for their dogs fouling the pavement; to have a private detective follow a family around for two weeks to see if they were outside of a school catchment area….
If you have nothing to hide to you really have nothing to fear?
Mike S, Manchester (05/05/2009 at 17:39)
Also, I applaud the pilots for taking the stance they have. It's a typical stealth way of introducing the scheme, quietly, one part at a time and then, before you know it, the government has exactly what it wants and the whole country has to have them. Did anyone really believe that it would ever be a voluntary scheme?
Further, does anyone else think it's no coincidence that they're trialling it in Manchester airport - owned by the Labour-run council?
token male, lush green cheshire (05/05/2009 at 17:45)
RT, UK (05/05/2009 at 18:43)
Using the airports for these cards is the back door of introducing them.
The Pilots are showing that they are not as stupid as many who believe Labour and their control freak mentality...
JoeStalin,Gorton (05/05/2009 at 18:48)
PW, Manchester (05/05/2009 at 18:49)
Who taught me to think like that? The Government did.
Joe Pub, Manchester (05/05/2009 at 22:16)
RT, UK LOOK AT THE ROADS,and streets this is where the stealth tax started.
citycentre, manchester (05/05/2009 at 22:52)
leave the door open tomorrow would you, i fancy popping in for a look round; after all you have nothing to hide
Anthony , Accrington,Lancashire (06/05/2009 at 07:39)
johnnyboy, Ashton-u-Lyne, Lancashire (06/05/2009 at 08:34)
The identity card will be used to milk the public when accessing the internet as well as censoring its use, by identifying individual users and issuing fines when not towing the governments line or criticizing them!
schgittor (06/05/2009 at 09:34)
gerts, South Manchester (06/05/2009 at 13:10)
Horatio Dogsbody, Flixton (08/05/2009 at 12:59)
Vin diesel (12/05/2009 at 12:46)
Everyone should be scared - very scared of this government. There are myriad proposals in place all aimed at ascertaining and recording at will any aspect of your once-personal life.
We have more CCTV cameras than ANY OTHER NATION ON EARTH...DNA records of the innocent still being kept...the local govt using terrorist legislation to spy on people who put their bins out on the wrong day...now proposals to keep a record of everyone you call and text...proposals to track who you contact on Facebook/Myspace etc...proposals to track and record what websites you visit....the list goes on and on, and people aren't worried about civil liberties?
I suggest some people actually read that again. Why are you not concerned that the government will keep a record of all of the websites you visit and the people you contact? Who you bank with, what po*n sites you visit, where you shop, what trade union you belong to, what political interests you have. All of the above schemes are in the name of 'protecting the public and/pr preventing terrorism'. Scratch beneath the new labour lies and this actually means control. Control of the ordinary citizen. No other 'democratic' country has such draconian measures in place to spy on it's citizens. This legislation will in future be used to stop you visiting websites, to track you anywhere in the country and indeed to stop you travelling abroad.
Just look at China - they routinely ban access to a number of foreign websites that criticise their government or expose human rights abuses by their police. Their people are not free and if people in the country don't stand up NOW ane be counted, we will follow their example.
One final thought - if all of the above is really to prevent terrorism, why don't the government continue to use existing legislation ie where the police take reports to the judiciary and have a judge decide on the merits as to whether suspect x can be spied upon, have his internet activity and phone calls monitored etc etc?
Too costly? Too difficult? Or is this just a smokescreen?