HOW you choose to speak depends, in my experience, on whether you require a respectful hearing or wish to risk a smack in the mouth.
On addressing a politician or a banker, it is proper to deploy the RP tones of a BBC announcer, so as to establish that you are talking down to such persons.
This will not, however, work with a 16-stone ruffian blocking your exit from a pub. For him, it is necessary to raise the register by at least an octave, dropping the odd aitch or two and repressing all expletives.
The important thing is that everyone in this country should have acquired, on leaving school, the trick of suiting the patter to the occasion. Very few school-leavers have done so. They go into the infants' class lisping and come out of the secondary department grunting, fodder for the hiring manager's contemptuous snub. Many cannot utter two clear sentences together on their mobiles. What employer dares to let them loose on an office telephone?
It is to redress this widespread inarticulacy that the government has assigned Sir Jim Rose, a former Ofsted chieftain, to improve the quality of spoken English in primary schools. Sir Jim's task is to endow every child, by the age of 11, with the ability to use fluent, intelligible English in formal settings; to teach them the difference between the acceptable patois of the playground and the essential verbal protocol of asking for something in a cafe or a shop.
Sir Jim, I fear, faces a tough fight. Some of his adversaries are in the teaching profession. They have been preaching, for over 30 disastrous years, the alleged iniquity of interfering with the 'innate' speech patterns of working-class children. These teachers however old-fashionably leftist their leanings, are middle-class people; so what gives them the moral right to keep the children of the housing estate branded on the tongue?
I am not, of course, talking about regional accents. These, though glorified mostly by people who themselves never use them, are rarely impediments to comprehension. It is even possible to grasp what a Scouser is saying if his vocabulary is as broad as its bronchitic delivery. I myself often revert to my own native Lancashire when chatting up a barmaid, and always when talking to my dog. No, accents are seldom a problem. What is is the inability to tune one's intonation to the context. There is more than one way to order a cup of coffee. Do it with a sullen grunt, and you deserve to get it thrown in your face. Do it with a lightish, smiling lilt and you may get a saucer with the cup. Especially, if you add a `please'.
Sir Jim's other main difficulty will be to overcome the insidious influence of popular culture. He will soon discover, if he hasn't already, that most children today learn their spoken English from EastEnders, that appalling daily chronicle of cockney jail-bait. That is why, from whichever part of the country they come, they pronounce such words as `city' and `creative' without a middle `t'.
You would never hear Kate Winslet doing that, unless she was playing a cheap strumpet. But the force of the soap's pseudo proletarianism has affected even her, causing her to express a sighing self-consciousness about being 'nicely spoken.' She regrets that her voice inhibits Berkshire folk from accepting her as an ordinary Reading girl.
But Kate isn't ordinary. She is a versatile film actress, capable of assuming any voice a role assigns to her, not excluding that of a trailer-park mid-west American dimwit. We can't all be actors, but in the manner of talking to others it is sociologically handy for us to play many parts. Casanova for the barmaid, Caligula for the conman, Confucius for the dog.
Duke Dave's battles with right and wrong
I doubt that Duke Dave Cameron's collaboration with the Liberals to let several thousand retired Gurkhas into the country has pleased his Tory rank and file. Indeed, some I have met are so enraged that they are talking of defecting.
I support the Duke's stance, of course, but fear he has yet to learn that he is leading a party far to the right of his admirably just inclinations.
Tweet
Opinion: Andrew Grimes
May 01, 2009
Andrew Grimes

Showing comments 1 to 11 and replies | View All
Angie33 , Manchester (01/05/2009 at 11:14)
I often get my brain completely scrambled by adults who havent learned to listen.
I may start a sentence and the non listener second guesses where I may be going and has formed and vocalized a response based on the first few words of a sentence.
I try again.,get another few words out,still not finished sentence.It happens again and again.At this point I give up-or shout.'WILL YOU SHUT UP.'It can take an hour for me to get over this kind of mental assault.-which is what it feels like.I think twice before engaging with this person again.
In children this sort of behaviour would be considered one of the symptoms of ADHD.That impulsive blurting out and not listening.What matter good or bad speech if listening is absent nothing can be learned.
Its especially annoying when Ive called them-on my phone,because Im paying for it as well.
My brains hurting just thinking about it.
David, North M/C (01/05/2009 at 12:01)
I can't see any evidence of this kind of speaking being corrected.
PW, Manchester (01/05/2009 at 13:43)
(How I hate that kind of talk, and I'm working class)
Bolton expat, Hamilton Canada (01/05/2009 at 14:53)
ergo (01/05/2009 at 15:53)
The trouble is to understand English you need to know linguistics,most words are either foreign often corrupted, or made up like tram and mart,you might as well use the martway to the shopping tram they are both meaningless. I understand a train is a retinue of carriages pulled by an engine.Belvedere is a meaningless posh name for a hotel but Bel vedere is a beautiful sight to an Italian child. No wonder we get mixed up.Why call a town Beulieu? Villedieu Des Les Poeles is where god makes the best frying pans I am sure any French child knows that
American English is older and more precise, which is why they are more articulate. I was intrigued to find when setting off explosive charges they shout "Fire In The Hole".We used to shout firing or look out or whatever. Why do golfers shout FORE Is that a corruption like the man with a stammer who shouted Fffff....
I went to Every Street school,and could boast I had stood on every street in Manchester till I discovered it was Yvery street named after the French wife of one of the Mosley family who lived in Ancoats Hall at the end of the street until our mad council obliterated it and much of our local history. So don't just blame us or the schools for the inarticulate.I think that advert for Compare the MeerKat.com says everything you need to know about the English and their English.I love it.
Supreme Being, Manchester. (01/05/2009 at 17:45)
I must be the only person that still texts the full words, but at least I can spell them.
Angie33 , Manchester (01/05/2009 at 17:48)
ergo (01/05/2009 at 19:38)
It is not only the English that make words up.There is a word in Japanese pronounced 'Backashan'It is made up from the English word 'back' and the German word 'Schon' meaning beautiful.it is used to describe a woman who looks better from the back than the front.I think we have all had that happen. Also shares on the stock market that look to have better prospects than they really have.I think the stock market is in a backashan moment at present.
RedLee, Mancunia (01/05/2009 at 20:00)
David, North M/C (01/05/2009 at 21:00)
Laura Norder, Didsbury (01/05/2009 at 23:38)
I agree, absolutely.
And what really tees me off is the way that youngsters, yep, I'm old, have adopted a bizarre white, Uk/West Indian/Asian patois... why?
The English language - and I'm a Scot - is the language of business, travel and worldwide communication... why take on some low-level, local dialect that means nothing to the overwhelming majority of humanity?
It's laziness. no more - no less. And schools need to drive the importance of good language skills to their students.
(Heavens, I bet the above is full of typos - it's late.)