THE battle to claw back The Christie's lost £6.5m took to the streets - as ministers confirmed they will consider whether the hospital should be compensated.
Take part in our online petition
here
.
Yesterday the M.E.N. revealed that a powerful body of MPs from all parties have recommended charities should get cash back that disappeared in the Icelandic banking crash.
But MPs on the Treasury select committee said local authorities who lost money shouldn't be bailed out.
The recommendations were confirmed as Christie campaigners took to the streets of Manchester to add more signatures to a petition calling on the government to step in.
A spokesman for the Treasury, which will make the final decision in the next two months, said they would 'consider the select committee's report carefully and respond in due course'.
A spokeswoman for The Christie said: "This is a positive step forward, but until we are assured that the findings of the report have been accepted and acted on by the Treasury we will continue with all our efforts to have our funds returned.
"We would like to remind everyone that this money was in a UK-regulated bank and has been tirelessly raised by our generous fundraisers for years."
John McFall, chairman of the Treasury select committee, said: "The committee came to the unanimous conclusion that it is only possible on this occasion to compensate charities and this is what we have recommended.
"The work undertaken by the charitable sector often provides the most vulnerable elements of society with invaluable support. At a time when more people than ever are faced with difficult economic circumstances, we believe that it is imperative that charities have access to the funds that were provided to them by the public."
Gordon Brown, who has spent billions bailing out British banks, has expressed sympathy with The Christie but warned the 'central issue' was that the money was invested in another country.
The Withington cancer hospital lost the cash when the bank Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander went bust.
The bank had the highest possible security rating at the time the money was invested. It was earmarked for new satellite radiotherapy centres in Salford and Oldham, which are still going ahead despite the loss of the cash.
Christie bosses tried to get the money back through the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, which is aimed at protecting individual investors.
They argued the victims were individual people who had donated to the charity fund. But the FSCS said the hospital didn't fit the criteria.
More than 30,000 people, including MPs, have signed an M.E.N. petition calling for the cash to be refunded.
Tweet
Christie fight takes to streets
April 04, 2009



Showing comments 1 to 10 and replies | View All
Custard Pie (04/04/2009 at 08:17)
markyboy, manchester (04/04/2009 at 09:20)
personally i dont think christies should get any money, as a taxpayer i am being bled dry by this nu labour lot, now i am expected to shell out more hard earned cash to support an outfit which played the banking system and got its fingers burnt.
christies have in the past when collecting money said they were despertae for the donations?, so why then stash at least £6.5 million in an overseas account?.
at least the fnance manager should do the decent thing and resign, because they screwed up big style, but oh no they start whining to the press at how hard done by they are. i suspect that if the bank hadn't collapsed they would be rubbing their greedy little handsa the extra money they made.
before anyone starts slagging me off for this post, i do know what cancer does - it took my sister at 50 who left 3 kids in their teens.
d1v1s1onby0, Wigan (04/04/2009 at 09:37)
I have a tip for a sure thing this afternoon at the National - but if it loses I wont get my money back.
"It was earmarked for new satellite radiotherapy centres in Salford and Oldham, which are still going ahead despite the loss of the cash"
OK so how much more have they got squirrelled away? I am sick of hearing of stuck for cash they are when not only can they lose £6.5M they can afford to cover the losses themselves (thats at total of £13M they had knocking around)
Anyone who thinks that charities these days are actually run as charities is kidding themselves - they are clearly being run as businesses, with the high saleries and financial shenanigans that we have all to to loath
PAH , Manchester (04/04/2009 at 17:37)
Empty Head, Southport (04/04/2009 at 22:29)
Mike N, Oldham (05/04/2009 at 10:29)
Dave Pollard (05/04/2009 at 12:39)
I mean, just think about it for a minute,..Iceland...a safe place to put your money!!!!
Black Flag (05/04/2009 at 14:42)
That's irrelevant. Nobody is denying that they do good work, but they made a bad decision which lost money and if they are bailed out, the burden will have to fall on somebody else's shoulders. It's all very well saying they should be given more money, but that money will have to be taken out of somebody else's pocket.
Esso Blue, , Manchester. (05/04/2009 at 16:40)
chadwick (06/04/2009 at 17:31)