THE former headteacher of a top Manchester school has called for unruly pupils to be sent to borstal.
Stephen Patriarca, who stood down as head of William Hulme Grammar School last year, launched a blistering attack on the government for 'pandering' to the needs of disruptive pupils. He claimed the most difficult children could benefit from a 'short spell in what used to be a borstal'.
The Whalley Range school, founded in 1887, was one of the country's top private schools before it entering the state sector two years ago as a semi-independent academy.
Speaking at an education conference, Mr Patriarca said there were pupils on local authorities' 'hard to place' lists 'who are basically on the verge of being young criminals, they have been involved in acts of violence against teachers and pupils, theft or drug offences'.
"Some of these children do need tough love, they need something like a short spell in what used to be a borstal. If you keeping throwing money at them you're creating the very problem you're seeking to solve." He also slammed the 'Orwellian' Department for Children, Schools and Families, as a 'cumbersome hybrid that fulfils none of its roles very well'.
Mr Patriarca was appointed headteacher of William Hulme Grammar School in 2000.
The 55-year-old, who now works as an adviser to an international school in Austria, also warned schools which failed to take students from a mixture of different backgrounds risked turning into 'ghetto' areas, citing Oldham as an example.
He said: "If schools are purely neighbourhood schools then in areas where government has permitted ghettos to develop - such as Oldham - then schools become extensions of those ghettos."
Tweet
Former head's borstal call
March 13, 2009

Showing comments 1 to 18 and replies | View All
Black Flag (13/03/2009 at 10:20)
Permitted ghettos to develop? Is he proposing that the government should have been taking a stronger line in dictating where we can live?
It's becoming more noticable that people choosing to live in areas which are racially or religiously concentrated is only a problem for the powers that be if the people involved are deemed to be too poor. You never hear them complaining about the government permitting a ghetto to develop in Prestwich.
PW, Manchester (13/03/2009 at 10:39)
Bean B4, manchester (13/03/2009 at 10:48)
I do agree with him in respect of schools starting to develop as extensions of the ghettos actively built by the residents of places - for example Werneth. It can't be right, or to the advantage of anybody to have schools where nobody has English as a first language and where the kids go back to homes that simply won't and do not need to learn English.
But what is the solution? What are your thoughts Black Flag. You frequently criticise other people's suggestions but rarely propose any yourself.
Jomov (13/03/2009 at 10:48)
Grey Flag, manchester (13/03/2009 at 11:01)
"If schools are purely neighbourhood schools then in areas where government has permitted ghettos to develop - such as Oldham - then schools become extensions of those ghettos."
Permitted ghettos to develop? Is he proposing that the government should have been taking a stronger line in dictating where we can live?
It's becoming more noticable that people choosing to live in areas which are racially or religiously concentrated is only a problem for the powers that be if the people involved are deemed to be too poor. You never hear them complaining about the government permitting a ghetto to develop in Prestwich.
mmmmmmm yeah probably pretty true
Jay B, oldham (13/03/2009 at 11:12)
uss midway, Holstein Ostsee. (13/03/2009 at 11:43)
Pippa, Manchester (13/03/2009 at 11:49)
Sarcastion Nastyface (13/03/2009 at 12:58)
"Wrong! Do it again!"
These disruptive little rotters are having the happies days of their lives - at the expense of everyone else.
This guy is right. Give them a short, sharp shock.
Black Flag (13/03/2009 at 13:08)
Bean of the yard, stalybridge (13/03/2009 at 13:39)
Grey Flag, manchester (13/03/2009 at 13:56)
Bean B4, as with most situations, we could get a great deal of improvement by reducing the amount of interefering that busybodies, particularly the government, do in other people's lives, which in this area would mean making it clear that where we choose to live and who we choose to live near is none of their business and taking the provision of education out of the government's hands.
That is so true......................I think
Angie33 , Manchester (13/03/2009 at 14:40)
It featured 10 or 12 UK pampered brats.
On the whole they came from well off families and doting parents who had spoiled them to the point where they had become obnoxious,agressive,hateful monsters causing mayhem.
Towards the end of the series they were turned around.This was brought about by living in various basic environments,ruled over by nasty/nice sargeant major types.
I came to love some of them by the end of the series as they got the message 'Treat others as you would wish to be treated yourself', respect,listen,etc.They were broken you might say.
This being the case,and successful too,shouldnt we be putting the worst behaved poor children with inadequate parents and environment into luxury lives.
A luxury camp with king ,patient,respectful ,forgiving,mature adequate adults.
Take them bowling,skating,paintballing and to shows were their favourite stars are performing.
Special trips fishing or shopping with mum/dad figures who show only kindness and respect.
Luxury bedrooms with games and computers and a tutor on hand to teach them anything they dont know.
It should work.The rich kids brat camp did.
Esso blue & The Temple of Boom,, under the Blue Moonlight (13/03/2009 at 18:44)
Ace Shakespeare , manchester (13/03/2009 at 20:16)
andanotherthing, Mcr (13/03/2009 at 20:40)
And fair play to him.
andanotherthing, Mcr (13/03/2009 at 21:14)
The very least we can do is listen to the voice of experience. I trained as a social worker, I thought I could do something constructive. I bailed out...I realised most of my clients would rather have me pull them out of the mire time and again. Than take the clean slate provided and make something of it. Recidivism is a learnt behaviour.
In other words "if you do it for me, why should I bother".
These people never hit the ground, the state air bag inflates well before impact and they don't give a toss, cos it will be there next time around.
Empty Head, Southport (15/03/2009 at 19:40)