A FAMILY of benefit cheats held down jobs while stealing more than £130,000 in welfare payments by claiming they were too ill to work, a court heard.
Five members of the Peters family all worked at the same cleaning firm in Sale, Greater Manchester, while raking in thousands of pounds in benefits.
Allan and Lorraine Peters, from Eccles, Greater Manchester, claimed to be housebound and unable to walk while getting Incapacity Benefit, Disability Living Allowance and a mobility car each, Minshull Street Crown Court in Manchester was told.
But when investigators went to their house they seized wage slips - in false names - and a snap of the couple, smiling and seemingly pain-free as they boarded a gangplank for a boat trip on a Spanish holiday.
Today, Peters and his son Garry, were each jailed for nine months for benefit fraud. Lorraine Peters, her brother and another son, were all given non-custodial sentences by Judge Roger Thomas QC.
The court heard Mr Peters, 56, said on his claim form he suffered from angina, chronic pulmonary disease, sleep apnea, spondylitis and high blood pressure, adding he needed oxygen to be kept in his car and simple tasks like getting dressed were a “nightmare”.
He claimed £32,000 in benefits over a four year period while being paid £90 a week for doing 16 hours at North West Cleaning where his wife, two sons and brother-in-law also worked.
His wife was on the highest rate of benefits for her 'disability', claiming she suffered a 'catalogue' of illnesses, could not leave the house or do anything herself without help and need a nebuliser daily.
In fact she was a site supervisor at the firm - while being paid £37,500 in benefits.
Her son, Garry, 31, a father-of-one, claimed to suffer arthritis from the age of 23 and was paid Incapacity Benefit and Income support worth £39,000 for more than six years.
In fact he held down two jobs at the same time - as a cleaner working with his parents and as a window cleaner earning £60 a week.
Another son, Martin, 28, claimed Income Support, Jobseekers Allowance and a Carer's Allowance, supposedly for looking after his ill parents. He stole benefits worth £10,000 the court heard.
Fraudulent
Finally Compton McKenzie, 51, the brother of Lorraine Peters, also fraudulently claimed £10,000 in Incapacity Benefits.
In all, the family milked the system of around £130,000 over a period of between three and seven years, the court heard.
Lorraine Peters is now back on benefits, having re-applied and been granted - this time legitimately - incapacity benefit, disability living allowance and a mobility car.
Her husband also applied for benefits but was refused.
Garry Peters was working as a van driver, and in receipt of family tax credits, before he was sent to jail.
He offered to pay back the stolen funds at £80 a month - which would take more than 40 years to clear the debt.
The court heard the family simply gave false names and made up National Insurance numbers after Garry Peters first began working for the firm in 2004, before being joined by his relatives.
But they were all caught in January 2008 when the Department for Work and Pensions began investigating the firm.
All five eventually confessed to benefit fraud at a previous hearing.
The Peters' lawyer told the court the holiday snap was simply a three day trip to Spain, paid for by their daughter and they were not living a flash lifestyle at the taxpayers expense.
Judge Thomas, passing sentence, said it was wrong to say the family 'lived the life of Riley' by fleecing the benefits system - but said the system depended on people's honesty.
“The whole benefits system in this country is based upon the trust and honesty of those who claim,” he said.
“Those who are dishonest are dishonest towards legitimate workers and taxpayers who provide finance for this system.
“Quite clearly between the five of you a scheme had arisen that brought each of you to work for the same company while still claiming benefits.”
Lorraine Peters was sentenced to nine months imprisonment, suspended for two years.
Unemployed Martin Peters, paying off the £10,000 overpayment at £5 a week, was given a 12 month community order, a 160 hours unpaid work order and a six month supervision order.
Compton McKenzie was ordered to carry out 160 hours unpaid work, given a 12 month community order and a two month night-time curfew.
Mr Peters senior is appealing the DWP decision not to pay him benefits.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet




Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Ace Shakespeare , manchester (04/03/2009 at 16:21)
lizard (04/03/2009 at 16:24)
Jay B, oldham (04/03/2009 at 16:35)
toldyouso, salford (04/03/2009 at 16:41)
andanotherthing, Mcr (04/03/2009 at 17:06)
Terry, Manchester, Manchester (04/03/2009 at 17:10)
gladys rowbotham, Manchester (04/03/2009 at 17:20)
Ace Shakespeare , manchester (04/03/2009 at 17:26)
Is this a joke or what ? to give these theives yet even more of the taxpayers money after thieving off the system.BRITAINS BENEFIT SYSTEM IS A JOKE.Iam disabled and wish i was healthy enough to work? this woman has proved that shes capable of working so she should not be on disablement benefits.
Rob Wilson (04/03/2009 at 17:54)
Hows about sending some violent criminals there. Yeah, these people are freeloading scum, but there are rapists, child abusers and people on assault charges getting a lesser sentence! It doesn't add up.
I cant believe this family has again applied for benefits and she has been granted it, even though she proved she could work!!!
The firm should be made to pay back some money, as they obviously didn't check the national insurance numbers were legit.
As for the judges statement about the benefits system being run on trust. Gimme a break! If that is the case then it seriously does need scrapping and something put in its place. These people have helped highlight some of the many flaws.
Why was one guy given a night time curfew? Im confused!
They shouldnt be given another penny ever. They will soon be well enough to work. Low lifes exposing a flawed system thats makes us all mugs and allows people to continually abuse it, whilst taxes go up.
Taxpayers deserve answers and a strict overhaul. No excuses.
Mandata, Manchester (04/03/2009 at 17:55)
The lot of em......
If I was the judge I would order the case review officers in my court to explain why these toe rags weren't checked up on more regularly.
james duffy (04/03/2009 at 18:08)
Rick Jenks, Bury (04/03/2009 at 18:11)
andanotherthing, Mcr (04/03/2009 at 18:13)
Esso Blue & Blue Firework The Arabian Blue Knight, , Never trust the human equivalent of a meerkat. Barred from all Meerkat den's (04/03/2009 at 18:13)
Paddy Murphy.County Mayo , (04/03/2009 at 18:35)
Rob Wilson (04/03/2009 at 18:38)
Bean of the yard, stalybridge (04/03/2009 at 18:39)
Ferrari, Toulouse (04/03/2009 at 18:44)
lizard (04/03/2009 at 19:00)
"Today, Peters and his son Garry, were each jailed for nine months", As he (Peters) will be "kept" in prison how can it be justified that, "Mr Peters senior is appealing the DWP decision not to pay him benefits",?, Can prisoners claim benefits when/for the time they are incarcerated?, I don't understand?...help again please!.
Anipeel, higher openshaw (04/03/2009 at 19:24)
Frostee, Oldham (04/03/2009 at 19:28)
Oh dear, it's sad to see that British education, especially in regards to English, has missed its mark once again.
MsD, Manchester (04/03/2009 at 19:44)
In any event, I believe the lot of these trashy scrotes should have been jailed. They could have worked those lardy bellies off in the prison gym !
Jetstar, Manchest`oh ! (04/03/2009 at 19:51)
why should good behaviour get you a lighter sentence when good behaviour in the first place would assure you dont go to prison......is it me ?
Spero, Nr Oldham (04/03/2009 at 20:10)
Ms Piggy, Muppet land (04/03/2009 at 20:21)
As for females getting the better of males in this instance, I feel it could be the mothering nature calling. Does she have children to look after???
As for paying the cash back, the opinion is split there, can they afford it? or is the sentence retribution for the crime?
On the basis they all are lying, fraudulent cheating scum they deserve to be shot or hung, drawn and quartered or have their assets sold and declared bankrupt. Or all three.
Anyway scum always attract more scum and British society not knowing the difference between right and wrong will always go for the worse scumbag.
About time that the law abiding public (the minority in this country) demanded more prisons, longer sentences and severer punishments.
I am sick of working my guts out and getting the impression that it is easier being a criminal.