TWO company directors are facing jail after admitting making thousands of pounds selling fake ID cards that helped youngsters buy alcohol.
Adrian Holmes, 32, and Lucy Sanders, 28, both of Lymm, Cheshire, also admitted selling fake driving licences from their online company www.uwantid.co.uk.
They pleaded guilty to one joint charge of conspiracy to supply cards for use in connection with fraud when they appeared at Cheshire Crown Court.
Holograms
The £20 identity cards - some with holograms and embedded computer chips - were sold to teenagers and adults across Britain and around the world, helping them flout alcohol and driving laws.
The firm made between £100,000 and £200,000 from the operation.
Prosecution
Cheshire Trading Standards brought the prosecution, the first in the country against a company specialising in fake identity documents, after an 18-month investigation.
Peter Moss, prosecuting, said: "The business was bought as a going concern by Adrian Holmes.
"For a short time it sold driving licences. This was later changed and a disclaimer was added to the website.
"It was later changed to driving `permits'."
Websites
Hundreds of websites on the internet offer fake ID cards to help underage teenagers buy alcohol and enter pubs and night clubs.
Many, including www.uwantid.co.uk, take advantage of a loophole in the law by publishing disclaimers on their websites, stating that the products are for `novelty' use.
Testimonials
But the Lymm firm also published testimonials from customers.
Holmes and Sanders are due to be sentenced on April 20.
They were charged under the Fraud Act 2000, and pleaded guilty to supplying the cards knowing they allowed customers to dishonestly misrepresent their age, identity or legal capacity.
Judge Stephen Clarke told them a custodial sentence was possible.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Princess_Pam, Crumpsall (04/03/2009 at 08:31)
jacko101 (04/03/2009 at 09:19)
MsD, Manchester (04/03/2009 at 09:25)
Lawrence Glendinning (04/03/2009 at 09:35)
Bean B4, manchester (04/03/2009 at 10:43)
Barney Gumball LLB Hons (04/03/2009 at 11:17)
Ace Shakespeare , manchester (04/03/2009 at 11:31)
jeffb, buxton (04/03/2009 at 11:47)
G0D, Everywhere (04/03/2009 at 12:52)
I didn't realise you had a phobia of fake ID's ace. But seriously, how is a fake ID in anyway related to terror? You've been sucked in by the whole "terrorists are gonna get us all" hype, open your eyes, if someone wants to blow themselves and a building up, they don't need a fake ID to do it.
curiousyellow, Rusholme (04/03/2009 at 13:22)
Gary SK13 (04/03/2009 at 13:24)
I do not have a problem with these being made compulsory as i have nothing to hide, and if it makes the country a safer place what is the problem.
Umm Bop, Stockport (04/03/2009 at 13:26)
dog hardy, manchester (04/03/2009 at 13:26)
Black Flag (04/03/2009 at 13:36)
Especially not the megalomania which makes you think that, because you have no problem with it, you have a right to force your decision on everyone else.
WAF (04/03/2009 at 13:48)
These people were providing a service to people. Even underage youngsters in this country, I'd prefer they used the ID to get into a pub rather than swig cider mixed with meths in the local park. They're going to drink anyway, so why not used ID to do it?
The law is a joke sometimes!
Esso Blue & Blue Firework The Arabian Blue Knight, , Never trust the human equivalent of a meerkat. Barred from all Meerkat den's (04/03/2009 at 14:08)
selfexiled (04/03/2009 at 15:17)
Batfink, Manchester (04/03/2009 at 15:43)
Black Flag (04/03/2009 at 15:59)
I don't even see that being successful. The majority of benefit fraud is achieved by people being dishonest about their circumstances, not their identity.
andanotherthing, Mcr (04/03/2009 at 16:40)
Snare Drum 54, Ashton-u-Lyne (04/03/2009 at 16:55)
Gary SK13 (04/03/2009 at 16:57)
Rob Lawrence (04/03/2009 at 17:09)
The thing they miss about the objective of ID cards is not about proving who you are, but catching fraudsters who claim to be someone they are not. ID Cards, as a proof of identity, are proven to be successful in contributing to catching identity thieves and detecting suspicious transactions, and successful if expediting customer due diligence procedures.
Black Flag (04/03/2009 at 18:38)
Clearly that was your intention when you said "I do not have a problem with these being made compulsory" rather than "I do not have a problem with having one." I don't mind carrying a nectar card, but I wouldn't want to force other people to have one; I suppose that's down to me having manners and respect for other people's choices.
"perhaps you have something to hide by your reaction."
Ah, the usual "guilty until proven innocent" approach. It's getting a bit old hat now, like "nothing to hide, nothing to fear," which has been shown to be complete nonsense by the government's continual loss of data.
Rob Lawrence, if you'd given a decent reason for having ID cards last time you were on here, I would have considered it, but you didn't; your potential to profit from an ID card scheme seemed to have clouded your judgement. If you've got a decent case to put forward this time, I'm all ears.
Gary SK13 (04/03/2009 at 20:24)