GREATER Manchester has secured a £1m bonus for cutting traffic levels while the congestion charge debate raged.
The region voted overwhelmingly in December to reject a government deal that would have seen nearly £3bn spent on public transport in return for a peak-hour charge of up to £5 a day.
At the time, senior politicians claimed increasing traffic levels could damage Greater Manchester's economy in the decade to come.
Now the ten boroughs have been awarded £978,356 by the government after official figures revealed the amount of people travelling on major roads had actually been going DOWN.
The number of people using the roads fell 8.6 per cent in the last quarter of 2008, while journey times were down by 1.6 per cent.
The cash comes from the government's Urban Congestion Performance Fund and must be invested in further reducing congestion.
A spokesman for the Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive claimed the figures reflected more people using public transport during the congestion-charge debate.
"There was an increased awareness of public transport over that period which may have led to more people considering alternatives to driving," said the spokesman. "The long-term view is that congestion is still increasing."
But former `No' campaigners said the figures proved money had been wasted on the campaign.
Sean Corker, of Manchester Against Road Tolls, said: "Tens of millions of pounds were spent on the congestion charge plans over a two-year campaign, and now we are told congestion is going down.
"Someone has not been telling the truth and it is time somebody resigned."
The Government warned last night that it should not be assumed congestion would continue to fall.
Indications
A Department for Transport spokesman told the MEN: "All the indications are that long-term congestion is on the increase, which is why we are working with local authorities, for instance with the Transport Innovation Fund.
"These figures cover a relatively short period of time. It is possible to minimise the impact in a short period but in the long-term there might have to be further measures.
"Congestion is expected to grow to the level where it harms economic growth."
The £60m Urban Congestion Performance Fund has been set up to help the country's ten largest urban areas identify and tackle the causes of congestion on major routes. More money will be made available if the city continues to progress.
Nationwide, congestion fell by around three per cent.
Transport Minister Paul Clark said he was `delighted' to award Greater Manchester the cash, claiming it would lead to `faster, safer and more reliable journeys'.
"Congestion has serious consequences for the economy and the environment and is a frustrating experience for all road users," he said. "Across England we have now provided nearly £23 million to the participating authorities to tackle urban congestion which is responsible for 80 per cent of all our congestion problems."
Tweet
£1m bonus as congestion falls
February 24, 2009

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
andanotherthing, Mcr (24/02/2009 at 06:10)
NS (24/02/2009 at 06:56)
Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (24/02/2009 at 07:06)
OR
A spokesman for the Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive claimed the figures reflected more people using public transport during the congestion-charge debate.
"There was an increased awareness of public transport over that period which may have led to more people considering alternatives to driving," said the spokesman.
Which is right? If it's to do with the campaign, why has it gone down nationally?
johnnyboy, Ashton-u-Lyne, Lancashire (24/02/2009 at 08:43)
Trudy, Bolton (24/02/2009 at 08:46)
enlightened (24/02/2009 at 08:58)
No mention is made that the road user numbers has decreased due to the shambolic state of the UK economy, just shows how blinkered they are.
Bean B4, manchester (24/02/2009 at 09:07)
Either we were being fed totoally incorrect information regarding traffic levels (quote: 'doing nothing is not an option')
or
The 'prize' is an underhand government contribution to the costs to be borne by we the tax payer.
I hope we will receive a full explanantion from someone.
Chris R, Irlam (24/02/2009 at 09:20)
Ask the people who actually use the roads instead of those with vested interests and you'll see the true picture.
The recession will only add to falling traffic levels - by the end of the year the roads will be even emptier than they are now. No Toll Tax is needed here!
Black Flag (24/02/2009 at 09:40)
Mr Paul Teeque - DEMOCRACY IS ALIVE IN MANCHESTER! WE WON!, Proud of his fellow mancs!!! (24/02/2009 at 09:42)
Who thinks this £1 million is a payoff to make us forget the waste of money that was the con charge, as we'll be the ones footing the mop up bill with increased council tax!
CongestionCol, Manchester (24/02/2009 at 10:29)
Angry Mike, Middleton (24/02/2009 at 10:31)
It is time for change in the leadership of this country, BROWN OUT
Jay B, oldham (24/02/2009 at 10:50)
and now they are trying to make out they where trying to win en extra £1million?
oh come on MEN even you cannot be fooled with this one!
Jay B, oldham (24/02/2009 at 10:52)
The people of manchester where right all along!
these two where not!
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw (24/02/2009 at 11:00)
Mike S, Manchester (24/02/2009 at 11:08)
Chris R, Irlam (24/02/2009 at 11:41)
You were saying that in the middle of last year when fuel prices were high (exactly what you blamed then). But the decline has continued.
What will you blame when the decline continues throughout this year Munkey Boy?
Jay B, oldham (24/02/2009 at 11:58)
they where wrong!
Black Flag (24/02/2009 at 12:00)
The massive recession that we are entering, obviously! When consumption falls, people tend to drive around a lot less.
Jay B, oldham (24/02/2009 at 12:23)
after all they have rewarded manchester with money for reducing congestion! when its really just down because of the slowing of the economy!
Black Flag (24/02/2009 at 12:28)
I don't think anybody needs me to point that out for them!
mole in a hole (24/02/2009 at 12:39)
Conjestion dropped in this period simply because people returned to the Metro after having had to resort to their cars because Metro was shut for the whole of the previous period!
More rubbish from the con-charge brigade!
PW, Manchester (24/02/2009 at 12:47)
Air quality and journey times are being made worse by those who pretend to be concerned about congestion and its effects.
nyb, ex manc (24/02/2009 at 12:47)
It's simple, make people redundant and put up the price of fuel, result...reduction in car journies, it's hardly rocket science.
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead (24/02/2009 at 13:21)