A BID to ease the recession for families across Greater Manchester by scrapping a 10p bus-fare rise for schoolchildren has failed.
Labour transport bosses attempted to halt plans to increase concessionary fares to 80p from April 1.
But they were defeated by a Tory and Lib-Dem coalition.
Over 60s travel free on all off-peak buses, trains, and trams in Greater Manchester and will only pay the new fares if they travel before 9.30am.
But councillors behind the Labour revolt say they are concerned about families with schoolchildren.
Greater Manchester's 10 council leaders ordered Greater Manchester Integrated Transport Authority to raise the concessionary fare to help balance the budget.
David Jones, former Oldham council leader, proposed that the money should be found from reserves.
He said: "This increase, during the present economic situation, would make things very difficult for a number of families who have seen their incomes reducing.
"People are having to take pay cuts and there are large-scale redundancies. It is wrong to think about increasing the burden on them.
"Figures show that for every 10p increase, we get a million fewer bus journeys. That would mean a serious effect on the social mobility of young people."
Stockport councillor Peter Scott said: "Many families have more than one child at school. This is going to make things extremely expensive."
The ITA has to clear its budget with council leaders at the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities. It is then collected as a levy through council taxes.
The authority also subsidises unprofitable bus routes.
The cost of subsidies has gone up by more than 12 per cent because of fuel costs.
Conservative chairman Matt Colledge said: "Two years ago we talked about increasing the fare to 80p. We decided not to but now we have deferred it as long as possible.
"This is not something which any of us wants to do but our hands are tied."
Tweet
Snub over kids' bus fares
February 09, 2009

Showing comments 1 to 11 and replies | View All
MancunianTiger, Radcliffe (09/02/2009 at 11:08)
MancunianTiger, Radcliffe (09/02/2009 at 11:15)
Charles Town, Ashton under Lyne, Lancs. (09/02/2009 at 13:05)
"Labour transport bosses attempted to halt plans to increase concessionary fares to 80p from April 1"
These are the same Labour people that said fares would be capped if we had a congestion charge - they knew it was wrong then - and now we have proof that they are powerless.
Phil L, Denton (09/02/2009 at 14:11)
In addition, there is the problem of overloading, especially in the late afternoons, exacerbated by kids taking up three seats each (one for their backside, and one for each dirty trainer) at the back of the bus.
The Free fares policy was introduced in London a few years ago, and TfL concede there has been a "proportionate" rise in crime on buses. Two big differences; TfL have a £60 million budget to tackle Crime and security, and their bus services are protected by contracts. Gtr. Manchester has NO law enforcement on/around buses, and the majority of services are commercial. If full fare paying, law abiding adults are forced off buses by yet more yobs, then the services will make a loss, and under the 1985 Transport Act, will have to be cut or completely withdrawn.
Oh! And who subsidises the free/reduced fares for kids?
LittleMancMinx, Ashton Under Lyne (09/02/2009 at 14:26)
Peter M, Mcr (10/02/2009 at 09:21)
Cllr Mike Amesbury (10/02/2009 at 09:59)
Phil L, Denton (10/02/2009 at 11:35)
citycentre, manchester (10/02/2009 at 13:51)
"These are the same Labour people that said fares would be capped if we had a congestion charge - they knew it was wrong then - and now we have proof that they are powerless. "
yes, the same labour people who attempted to introduce powers to control bus fares; which we voted down, so they dont have the powers they need
Charles Town, Ashton under Lyne, Lancs. (10/02/2009 at 15:12)
The mantra was "We will cap bus fares", not we wil TRY to get buses regulated like wat they waz!
citycentre, manchester (10/02/2009 at 19:31)
included in the TIF bid was the use of quality contracts, which would have allowed for a mch greater level of bus regulation, had we chosen to go down that route