A MOTHER and daughter who kept 50 cats in 'horrendous conditions' and left two dead kittens rotting in a kitchen cupboard have admitted causing unnecessary suffering.
RSPCA officers found the cats living in the small terrace in Midlothian Street, Clayton, last March.
Piles of excrement and dirt covering almost every surface, floor and wall and one officer described it as 'the worst case' she had seen in seven years.
One of the animals, who had a tumour on its mouth and a respiratory infection, had to be put down immediately.
Four others have since been put down.
Joan Adams, 67, pleaded guilty to two counts of causing unnecessary suffering to animals when she appeared before Manchester magistrates.
Her solicitor, Stuart Kaufman, also entered guilty pleas on behalf of her daughter Anne Adams, 43, who did not turn up at court.
Anna McDonald, prosecuting, said RSPCA officers had been alerted to the condition of the house by police, who attended after a burst water pipe flooded the property.
Suffered
Miss McDonald said: "Inspectors found a large number of cats. The hallways, bath room, kitchen, including the sink and bath, and bedrooms were extremely dirty and covered in faeces.
"A vet agreed the animals should be removed on welfare grounds.
"The vet who examined the cats the next day said they were all in a poor condition, with ear mites, and would have suffered as a result."
Magistrates were shown photos and a video of the house. One photo showed the corpses of two kittens on a shelf in a kitchen cupboard, next to bowls, mugs and breakfast foods.
Joan Adams, who was taken to hospital after the flood and now lives in a bungalow, said: "I thought the cat had a blister on its mouth and I washed it with hot water, but I agree with you now.
"It was terrible the house, I know.
"I should have cleaned it up, I tried but I didn't do enough."
Mr Kaufman, who told magistrates Joan Adams was quite a 'confused' lady, said: "There were two months between the flood and the photos being taken.
"Miss Adams said the water was about 4ft deep, and the flood will have caused some of what you see.
Smell
"No one was living there for two months and things must have got progressively worse."
The case was adjourned until early February for probation reports, with both women facing a maximum of six months in prison and a fine up to £20,000.
The RSPCA has also applied for an order to ban them from keeping animals for life.
RSPCA chief inspector Cathy Hyde said: "It is a sight no-one ever wants to see, a house completely covered in cat excrement. There was not a single clean surface and the smell was overpowering.
"There were two dead kittens, probably about eight weeks old found in a cupboard.
"They're not specific to our proceedings because we're not able to prove how they died because they were decomposing, but that was very distressing to some of the officers involved in the investigation.
"In terms of how dirty the house was inside, this is the worst case I've had to deal with in seven years with the RSPCA."
Both defendants were given unconditional bail. The surviving cats will be re-homed if scans show they are free of disease.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet


Showing comments 1 to 7 and replies | View All
Pippa, Manchester (21/01/2009 at 19:03)
andanotherthing, Mcr (21/01/2009 at 19:58)
If you had ever had the misfortune to report a case of animal abuse to the R.S.P.C.A you would be truly shocked at their (lack) of response. The aim of that organisation is purely focused on prosecution.
a big story generates more money. Even politicians, lawyers, and child welfare groups are criticizing them strongly.
You report evident and obvious abuse or neglect to them, but they will not intervene until the animal is so badly distressed. Because they want the prosecution. They are no longer interested the welfare of the animal.
What I am saying is the neighbours may well have reported this long before it got to this situation. But this is the situation the R.S.P.C.A allow to happen, just to get that coviction.
JKW, Stockport (21/01/2009 at 20:44)
I completely agree with a lifetime ban but also have sympathy for those concerned, after all, who in their right minds would choose to live in those conditions, sounds like there is a lot more to this story.
Marc (21/01/2009 at 22:18)
i totally agree with this comment. i have a friend who works as a care manager for the elderly and, whenever this person discovers a case of animal abuse, they take it upon themselves to re-home the animals rather than rely on the RSPCA.
my own experience of the RSPCA has been 100% negative.
in this particular case i can only hope that the poor cats are re-homed successfully. if i didn't have a newborn baby in the house i'd be willing to take on a couple of them myself.
alvinlwh (21/01/2009 at 23:00)
LogicalLion (21/01/2009 at 23:33)
Like most charitable organisations the RSPCA have a tough job to do , with limited funding. I called them several years ago about a rather disturbing pet shop I had visited, I recieved no response until several other people had voiced concerns. Three months later, the shop closed. Yet when I had an injured pigeon on my doorstep a few months ago they turned up in less than two hours & were great about it.
It's quite possible that nobody complained if the only person getting close enough to smell the house were the people living there & the postman.
LittleMancMinx, Ashton Under Lyne (22/01/2009 at 12:59)
Think your comment is wrong cats are living feeling creatures at the end of theday and shouldnt of beem treated like that