Brian Rawsthorne, 50, took part in the Bupa Great Manchester run in May 2007 and crossed the finishing line after two hours and eight minutes.
He even appeared in the Manchester Evening News boasting how he had lost two-and-a-half stone as he trained for the race.
But at the same time he was receiving Disability Living Allowance and was paid £12,300 between November 2004 and September 2007.
He denied failing to notify the Department for Work and Pensions of a change in circumstances but was found guilty by a district judge after Manchester Magistrates' Court was shown M.E.N. articles about him taking part in the run.
The court was also shown a documentary by our sister TV company, Channel M, which showed him setting off on the big race.
Rawsthorne, a father-of-two, could be seen clapping his arms in the air in a warm-up session before running off.
Paul Darnborough, prosecuting for the DWP, said: "The department would say that his ability to cope with his disability is a change in circumstances.
"His health is improving, his fitness is improving and his diet is improving - meaning he could take part in sporting activities."
Explosion
The court was told the former miner, of William Lister Close, Newton Heath, had been the sole survivor of a horrific explosion that killed 10 men at Golborne Colliery, near Wigan, in 1979.
It left him with severe burns and damaged lungs.
He began claiming Disability Living Allowance in 1997 - insisting he sometimes had to walk on crutches, climb the stairs on his bottom and could not walk about in hot weather.
Officials at the DWP began an investigation after they received an anonymous tip-off that he was refereeing football matches and umpiring cricket games.
Investigator Steven Orwin told the court Rawsthorne admitted this in interview. He claimed he 'rarely left the centre circle' while refereeing five-a-side and 11-a-side football matches.
Rawsthorne added: "On hindsight, on reflection, I've been dishonest. But, I've not done it deceitfully. I've not done it maliciously."
He told the court that taking part in the race had been 'absolute agony' and had left him unable to walk for five weeks.
Deputy district judge Duncan Birrell suggested to Rawsthorne, who raised £1000 in the race, he had done a 'fair old stretch' in a 'reasonable time' and asked if this meant there had been a change in his circumstances.
But Rawsthorne replied: "I understand what you're saying, but there's been no change at all. I cannot walk 20 yards without being in pain."
"When I filled those forms in, hand on heart, that's the way I was. If I was to fill it in again, I wouldn't change it very much. My worse days are worse now than in 1997."
He said he had wanted to take part in the race because he wanted to take his wife abroad for their 25th wedding anniversary and did not want 'two seats on the plane'.
Rawsthorne said he had walked the entire race, apart from a 'jog' at the beginning, and had stopped several times before being in tears at the end.
His wife Jane, a registered nurse, said he had difficulty getting out of the bath and was unable to peel vegetables.
Neil Grunfeld, defending, said: "I don't think you can look at an isolated incident and say that, because he did that walk, his condition had changed."
Deputy district judge Birrell, sentenced Rawsthorne to a six month conditional discharge. There was no application for costs.
He accepted that he had not set out to be 'deliberately dishonest' and said he could feel `proud' having overcoming his pain to complete the race. But he added: "Your physical improvement was manifested by the fact that, in 2007, you could complete that 10k walk, which was something you should have properly notified to the DWP."
Roy Paul, North West Fraud Manager at the DWP, said after the hearing that the department would be seeking full repayment of the money.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
460
275
99NgShBTdSo
false
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Voice of Sanity (16/12/2008 at 08:26)
Viewer of Life, Stockport (16/12/2008 at 08:40)
So going from not being able to walk 20 yards, to completing a 10k, but we should not take it that that his condition changed!!, so what was it a temporary “miracle”
“Deputy district judge Birrell, sentenced Rawsthorne to a six month conditional discharge. There was no application for costs”. So basically he got off scot free.
umpire 2, Salford M7 4HT (16/12/2008 at 11:01)
I think the DoWP should look at their own staff, who do not complete their jobs correctly.
I have a close friend who is unemployed and his printer ran out of Ink for his job search record, they have stopped his money because they think he was not telling the truth.
He asked for an email address so that he could send it in, that was refused, he asked for a fax number that was refused, now when he was due to be paid, the person had not requested payment to him, therefore no money for food, electric, gas and they want them to do and find work.
I think the DoWP need to look at their own staff first of all and make sure they are all singing from the same song sheet as some of them think they more powers than soft Mick in the bookies shop.
S P In exile, Tameside (16/12/2008 at 12:48)
gillykins, urmston (16/12/2008 at 12:50)
Mr Manchester (16/12/2008 at 12:52)
He could do a charity 3 legged race next year, shackled to one of HMPs finest.
angry harry, sale (16/12/2008 at 13:05)
JJ against Leese's Tax! (16/12/2008 at 14:58)
now for the rest......
Esso Blue., Planet Blueto (16/12/2008 at 15:04)
My argument is are the DWP going to make him work now knowing he is in pain. Forced to work in pain.
Are you entitled to claim if you are in pain. I think he should be entitled to claim again with just a few alterations to his claim, otherwise it is forced labour.
JAIR, Snowdonia (16/12/2008 at 15:40)
NWmancCUB (16/12/2008 at 16:31)
I couldn't give a monkeys whether it was for charity or not. This man broke the Law, plain and simple.
trainman (16/12/2008 at 16:32)
Mr Manchester (16/12/2008 at 16:32)
Esso Blue., Planet Blueto (16/12/2008 at 17:07)
d1v1s1onby0, Wigan (16/12/2008 at 18:49)
BUT
The fact that it took him 2 hours and 10 mins to complete 10k means it was a very slow and clearly difficult accomplishment.
Take a look at the picture, everyone has gone home and there is no-one behind him.
trainman (16/12/2008 at 19:16)
b.kennerley, manchester (16/12/2008 at 20:15)
Esso Blue., Planet Blueto (16/12/2008 at 20:36)
10.000yrds sounds a lot, so does 30.000feet. but it was only about 6.6 miles
The 10K running record is 26 min :17secs
the world Walk record is 37 min :53secs
williams DWP clutching at straws walk 180 minimum
Billy Banjo Adams, Burnage (16/12/2008 at 22:12)
joedaplumba (16/12/2008 at 23:14)
*no* issue, radcliffe (17/12/2008 at 00:18)
How can you say he has committed a fraud?
He stated when he first started to claim "he SOMETIMES had to walk on crutches, climb the stairs on his bottom and could not walk about in hot whether; did he say everyday was the same? Everyday and every week is different for some people who suffer with pain.
They really need to catch the lazy bas*****s who stay in bed most days and the ones who are in the pub all day and night pretending they have an illness. ‹(•¿•)›
Bean B4, manchester (17/12/2008 at 09:14)
Viewer of Life, Stockport (17/12/2008 at 10:36)
GeoffWearmouth, Durham (17/12/2008 at 11:31)
ab1, manchester (17/12/2008 at 11:43)
should be made pay the money back with interest