THE man in charge of Greater Manchester's congestion charge referendum is being paid up to £600 a day, the M.E.N. can reveal.
Sir Neil McIntosh, who will oversee the count and came up with the question people will be asked, will also get a flat fee of £10,000 after votes are counted on December 12.
The cash - the equivalent of an annual salary of £162,000 - is being paid jointly by the 10 councils of Greater Manchester.
A spokesman for Sir Neil, the official returning officer for the referendum, said the sum reflected the responsibility of the role and had been agreed after advice from the independent Electoral Commission.
Sir Neil, who also oversaw the referendum on Scottish devolution, has already come under fire from members of the 'no' campaign for the ballot pack he has designed.
Charge
The voting slip itself will contain a 'preamble' mentioning both the charge and the money that would be spent on trams, trains and buses if it goes ahead.
The question itself, printed below, will simply ask: "Do you agree with the proposals?"
Manchester Blackley MP Graham Stringer and others have claimed the question should have directly mentioned the charge, as a central part of the package. Sir Neil has described his question as 'fair, clear and balanced'.
A spokesman for the returning officer said: "Sir Neil's remuneration has been agreed, following advice from the Chair of the Electoral Commission, on a suitable level of payment for the responsibility involved in delivering the referendum across Greater Manchester.
"Sir Neil is to be paid a fee of £600 per day when he is attending to matters in person, whether in Manchester or attending meetings elsewhere in connection with the referendum. These fees, together with a one-off lump sum of £10,000, which recognises his overall accountability for the referendum, will be paid on completion of the process."
The ten councils are jointly bidding for more than £2.75bn of investment from the government's Transport Innovation Fund, including £318m to set up a peak-hour, weekday-only congestion charge. Of the total, £1.2bn would be in the form of a loan, paid back over 30 years out of profits from the charge.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Roadrunner, Irlam (20/11/2008 at 07:10)
The question should have read:
Do you want to pay a congestion charge 'Yes' or 'No' because that is what this referendum is all about...the charge.. Not the TiF.
Voter (20/11/2008 at 07:31)
Tidders, Rochdale (20/11/2008 at 07:52)
Sir Pentest 2, Newton Nr. Hyde. (20/11/2008 at 08:03)
'VOTE NO' Its the only sensible way.
johnnyboy, Ashton-u-Lyne, Lancashire (20/11/2008 at 08:15)
Trumpetman21 (20/11/2008 at 08:18)
And remember - he who pays the piper calls the tune....
Vote NO - you know it makes sense!
Lawrence Glendinning (20/11/2008 at 08:24)
Does Sir McIntosh get affected by the Toll Tax?
Polky (20/11/2008 at 08:26)
Rammylad (20/11/2008 at 08:39)
e.g. Guideline 2 says neither positive nor negative words must be used to pursuede or disuede a yes or no vote. Yet in this referendum question we have the word 'massive' used to describe the transport investment yet the word 'only' used to describe the con-charge.
The reality is that the con-charge is needed to repay a £1.2bn loan. The transport fund is ~£1.2bn - £1.5bn. Therefore both elements of the TIF bid are equally massive, therefore to use the word only in relation to repaying a £1.2bn loan is directing a yes vote which as I said goes directly against guideline 2. They also fail to follow guidelines 3 and 4. See website link below: -
www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/58594/QuestionAssesmentGuidelines.pdf
Given that the loan is £1.2bn and the trasport investment is ~£1.2bn - £1.5n then the loan should also be mentioned in the question as its impact on the voters and the community is effectively equivilent to the impact of the transport investment.
However we need to pinch ourselves here and remember this a labour council forcing through Gordons wishes and Sir Noodles is not likely to follow the commissions guidelines as that would not allow him to use positive wording to describe the transport investment and therefore draw a yes vote.
Have I heard back from them, you guessed it, no I have not.
Jay B, oldham (20/11/2008 at 08:40)
DaveB, Manchester (20/11/2008 at 08:40)
Stephen Morris, English Democrats Party, Bury (20/11/2008 at 08:44)
Albert J Beancounter, At Home (20/11/2008 at 08:58)
Audenshaw Bob (20/11/2008 at 09:01)
How much money has been spent already? It's an absolute disgrace and it is your hard earned that is being frittered away.
Trudy, Bolton (20/11/2008 at 09:02)
walksyo, droylsden (20/11/2008 at 09:04)
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead (20/11/2008 at 09:06)
Bigfoot (20/11/2008 at 09:06)
Wait till you get your first £80 fine for forgetting to pay the charge which will double to £160 if you don't pay within f14 days (As per London). Also when GMPTE increase the charge to £10 per day because the £5 charge has not reduced traffic to the extent they forecast. Wait till you have a complaint about the scheme or charge and can only speak to a computer recorded message.
These will be the everyday problems road commuters in Manchester will face should the scheme be approved.
Why give more power to the faceless bureaucrats and vested interests?
VOTE NO
Bean B4, manchester (20/11/2008 at 09:25)
VOTE NO FOR TRANSPORT PROGRESS!
Jay B, oldham (20/11/2008 at 09:47)
what a waste!
yet more money that could have gone on improvements has been wasted.
i wait for the yes lot to blame the anti's for calling for the vote!
Audenshaw Bob (20/11/2008 at 09:48)
Again they refused as there were ONLY three grounds for appeal - not your car, you weren't the driver and one other that I can't remember. Any other reason won't be considered.
I phoned and said that they only way for me not to have stopped was to have either hit the old bloke, swerved around him or edged right upto him.
They said I was stopped in a box junction (by two feet!) and that I now owed £320 and they were threatening to send in bailiffs to my employers (company car).
This is the type of thing that we will get in Manchester.
My parents don't want to pay £70 for a tag, can't be bothered to prepay and also don't want threatening letters delivered should they have not paid in advance i.e. your car was seen crossing the outer boundary. If you don not pay within 14 days we will begind court proceedings etc.
Easier to go to Chester as they have alreday started doing.
Mukarram Zahabi (20/11/2008 at 09:49)
Wat a wast of public money.
Personally the congestion chares are waste of time and public money. It will not bring any joy for businesses and the srevice compaies as they slowly and surely loosethe business.
The only way to succeed is to get rid of Car TAX for a start. Help to move the companies out of city, to a rurel area so that the town actually has no businesses left. And the local council hasto pay twice as much, in a day's revenue collected.
If this charges go a head, i am sueingthe local councils and the people involved, for allowing this to happen.
Thanks
M Zahabi
ruth davis, Salford (20/11/2008 at 09:55)
Jay B, oldham (20/11/2008 at 09:55)
so they wont get it.
the same will apply to manchester if it goes ahead.
Trumpetman21 (20/11/2008 at 10:07)
I actually think that should we be foolish enough to let this through the initial charges will be much higher than they are letting on....and it will be too late to do anything about it.
A superb reason to vote NO.