THE troubled B of the Bang sculpture is set to be pulled down – after the team that built it agreed to refund nearly £2m of taxpayers’ cash.
The 184ft structure, Britain’s biggest public artwork, has been plagued by safety problems since it was commissioned to mark Manchester’s Commonwealth Games triumph in 2002.
Nine of its 180 steel spikes have been removed after one fell off and the council has since spent an extra £300,000 making the artwork safe.
Now town hall chiefs are ready to give up on B of the Bang and consign it to the scrapheap, the M.E.N. can reveal.
Settlement
The decision comes after the designers – Thomas Heatherwick Studio Limited – and the subcontractors who built B of the Bang agreed to pay the city council £1.7m in an out-of-court settlement. Town hall chiefs were suing the consortium and the case was due to be heard later this month.
An official decision on the future of B of the Bang will be made in January.
But the M.E.N. understands the most likely outcome is that the sculpture will be pulled down early in the New Year.
Council leaders no longer believe it can ever be made safe, despite years of on-going tests.
Saga
The move will bring to a close a six-year saga that cast a shadow over one of Manchester’s greatest triumphs – the 2002 Games, which ranked as one of the city’s greatest successes.
Even before a single spike was welded, the price of tag for the project soared from £750,000 to £1.4m after it emerged installation costs had not been included in the original estimate.
The grand opening, originally due in scheduled for August 2003, did not take place until January 2005. Seven days before the unveiling ceremony, a 7ft spike fell off the sculpture – forcing engineers to fence it off from the public and fit vibration dampeners on the rest of the structure.
Firefighters were called out again in May to cut off part of another spike that which was hanging off and 12 months later – with the council still unable to say what was wrong with it – a further nine more spikes were removed.
The £1.7m being paid by Thomas Heatherwick Studio Limited and its partners will cover in full the costs of the sculpture, and of making it safe.
Ambitious
A spokesman for the studio, which is headed by ex-Manchester Polytechnic student Thomas Heatherwick, said: “The B of the Bang sculpture was an ambitious and ground-breaking design.
“It is a matter of considerable regret to all of us that the sculpture that was intended to symbolise the outstanding success of the Manchester Commonwealth Games has suffered the problems that have come to light.
“We are pleased that a settlement has been reached.”
Susan Orrell, the council’s city solicitor, said: “The settlement allows us to recover substantial damages and avoid further cost and the risks that are always associated with legal proceedings.
“I am pleased we have reached a settlement that is, in my view, in the best interests of the council. and now that this has been achieved, It means we can move on and consider the options for the future of the structure in conjunction with the project’s funders. A report will go to the council’s executive in the New Year.”
Talks
The money for B of the Bang came from a range of public bodies including the council itself (£120,000), the European Regional Development Fund (£700,000), the North West Development Agency (£500,000) and English Partnerships (£100,000).
The council is likely to hold talks with them to see about if they can agree a replacement for B of the Bang, probably on the same site.
Failing that, the £1.7m will be split and refunded.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Michael West, Manchester (18/11/2008 at 07:29)
Public art is an essential part of any town or city landscape and I know that people are likely to resent money being spent on art during the current economic period, I think investment in the arts is just what a depressed economy needs, for it shows that ambition and creativity are still very much alive.
It is a pity that it was been impossible to make safe and that no other suitable safe site is available for it.
Al Capone (18/11/2008 at 08:01)
John - sheikhing all over (18/11/2008 at 08:13)
however it's dirty rusty colour and it's dodgy spikes caused it's downfall.
better luck next time.
dessie, manchester (18/11/2008 at 08:17)
Bury Pensioner., Bury. (18/11/2008 at 08:25)
Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (18/11/2008 at 08:38)
gazz (18/11/2008 at 08:46)
Outside the sportcity stadium is a fantastic sculture of a sprinter setting of from the blocks. This would be an ideal replacement for the B of the Bang, it would be seen by far more people on the corner than hidden around the back at sportcity.
Bean B4, manchester (18/11/2008 at 08:50)
- pointless
- ill-conceived
- a waste of money
- of no merit
- of no value
- doomed to failure.
When will the council learn.
Jay B, oldham (18/11/2008 at 09:08)
first it was the big bang metrolink expansion promised by labour!
now the B of the bang is set for scrap.
it'll fetch a fair bit though in scrap value when its weighed in!!
Marc (18/11/2008 at 09:13)
umpire 2, Salford M7 4HT (18/11/2008 at 09:13)
The designer took the biscuit and ate it, and why shouldn't he at the time, it was just the work involved was rubbish.
The money should go to involving more children in sports, playing and extra money to sports development, parktastic and events like that.
Octavius Tinsworth Ace (18/11/2008 at 09:26)
I agree that it should be replaced with another piece of public art, though. Maybe not necessarily in the same place but somewhere more prominent as far as visitors to the city are concerned, and it ought to be a memorable, iconic design, not some anonymous statue that could be anywhere. (Either that or invest it in tree-planting or lighting in the city centre. Despite the progress that the city has made in the last twenty years, many areas of the city centre are still dark and forbidding at night.)
Albert J Beancounter, At Home (18/11/2008 at 09:56)
"£120,000 -- the amount of your money that the council "wasted""
Tha's forgeting that it cost £300,000 so it did not kill anyone. I know that few thousand quid a week is nowt to some - but it could and should have been better thought out. The use of stainless steel and harmonic balancers in the original design would have been cheaper in the long run. If the monument of "cutting egde design" was to have survived that is.
Miss M, Manchester (18/11/2008 at 10:23)
Maybe the £2m should go to re-housing the homeless, but i expect it will be swallowed up somewhere else!
Rodney Ward (18/11/2008 at 10:29)
Rodney Ward (18/11/2008 at 10:31)
Rod Ward
Ex Miners Son.
JJ against Leese's Tax! (18/11/2008 at 10:34)
Ace Shakespeare , manchester (18/11/2008 at 10:42)
Keith McRae's Ginger Nuts, Stockport (18/11/2008 at 10:42)
ebble, manchester (18/11/2008 at 10:57)
It'll be great to see the back of that horrible sculpture.
Ace Shakespeare , manchester (18/11/2008 at 10:59)
I fully agree i was all for a sculpture to remember the workshop of the world "Bradford"and east manchester and this included the pits that kept us all in work for so many yeqars and the industry that east manchester was built on .
R J Burgess (18/11/2008 at 11:02)
Vegas-blue, Stalyvegas (18/11/2008 at 11:07)
Good riddance to 'C of the Clang'!
Laura Norder, Didsbury (18/11/2008 at 11:10)
Marc (18/11/2008 at 11:18)
I believe Ace is generally referring to getting 'medieval' on people's 'bottoms' rather displaying any skills in retail. I could be wrong though. Ace, any chance of some clarification on this?