A CHICKEN plucked up the courage to cross the road to urge drivers to vote against Greater Manchester's transport referendum.
He cried 'fowl' at proposals for a congestion charge and strutted his stuff in Regent Road, Salford, wearing a sign that said Vote No to the Toll Tax.
Drivers looked baffled as the anti-charge protester, who gave his name as Colonel Kevin Peel Saunders, handed them leaflets dressed in a fancy dress chicken costume.
City centre insurance worker 'Kevin', 45, from Worsley, said: "I feel a bit cooped up in this outfit, but it's been worthwhile because the leaflets have just flown out of my hands.
"A lot of drivers have honked their horns. They know that, when the charge comes in, they'll be taxed for going to work. I'm just an average guy. It's one man against the system. But I do believe we can stop this."
He added: "I had the run of the road, but I wouldn't have to pay the charge anyway - because I'm a chicken. At least nobody told me to get stuffed."
The chicken stunt, daringly close to a fast-food chicken restaurant, was in support of protest group Manchester Against Road Tolls. Sean Corker, from the group, said: "We believe the Congestion Charge scheme is a turkey and nobody should support it in the run up to Christmas."
Protesters are campaigning for a 'no' vote in Greater Manchester's transport referendum. People will vote in a postal ballot in December on whether to accept the proposals. Voting papers are due to go out at the end of this month, with a voting deadline of December 11.
The bid would see more than £2.75bn ploughed into transport schemes, including £318m to set up a peak hour, weekday-only congestion charge. Some £1.2bn of the total would be in the form of a loan, paid back over 30 years out of profits from the charge.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Roger Petersen (14/11/2008 at 11:51)
Trumpetman21 (14/11/2008 at 12:07)
Haw haw!
NS (14/11/2008 at 12:18)
Classy sandwich board you've got there...
Audenshaw Bob (14/11/2008 at 12:22)
On Regent Road there are three sets of lights in quick succession. When the lights are on red you have to stop and if there is more than one car and it pulls up behind the first car then you have a queue. Or do you see the picture and see the cars and call this congestion?
In a tiny village in the Shetlands the same thing could happen. Two cars or more stop at lights. Should they introduce a congestion charge?
Queues are part of life. Maybe I'll go to Sainsbury's at 3am so as to avoid 'congestion' at the tills.
Or maybe we should all alleviate this by doing what the bus drivers do and ignore the lights.
rlfan, greater manchester (14/11/2008 at 12:32)
Henry Piggot-Smythe, Prestbury (14/11/2008 at 12:41)
chris.city, Manchester (14/11/2008 at 12:55)
Mad Welsh Scotsman, Cadishead (14/11/2008 at 13:04)
Roger Petersen,
Traffic Roger, not congestion. How do you know they weren't stopped at traffic lights?
AlexisV (14/11/2008 at 13:08)
No sign of the real Kevin Peel I see!!!
Tidders, Rochdale (14/11/2008 at 13:10)
Trudy, Bolton (14/11/2008 at 13:12)
citycentre, manchester (14/11/2008 at 13:26)
Trumpetman21
your view of pedestrians in the road seems to have changed since yesterday?
Bryan Neill (14/11/2008 at 13:29)
DO YOU WANT A CONGESTION CHARGE STEALTH TAX WAGE CUT? - vote AGAINST TIF. VOTE NO! (14/11/2008 at 13:38)
Love the message too very to the point!
VOTE AGAINST TIF!
Sean Corker MART (14/11/2008 at 14:37)
Kevin's our Con charge Chicken
Sean in the city, Manchester (14/11/2008 at 14:37)
Esso Blue, Manchester (14/11/2008 at 14:49)
d1v1s1onby0, Wigan (14/11/2008 at 14:51)
You need to realize that if you do, and there is no nominated authorized person to actually sign for them (As I suspect may be the case), then you risk your vote ( Be it OFR or AGAINST) simply sitting in a post office somewhere.
When you get your paper FOLLOW THE INSTUCTIONS EXACTLY as ANY DEVEATION could result in your vote not being counted
Trumpetman21 (14/11/2008 at 14:59)
What are you blathering on about now citycentre?
Pentest 2, Hyde (14/11/2008 at 15:01)
Take no notice of sean & Laura the borer, them and their lot are losing the plot.
Vote 'NO' for the 'CON' charge, you know it makes sense.
Jay B, oldham (14/11/2008 at 15:05)
he still accuses us of scaremoungering when we say that it'll get put on your council tax when the revenue has a shortfall!
and most other pro campaigners have agreed this could happen!
traffic is traffic!
congestion is caused bu reductions in road capacity!
or bottle necks created by your council to fool you into believing that its bad.
Albert J Beancounter, At Home (14/11/2008 at 15:08)
"What a stupid idiot! Telling people stuck in traffic to block plans to reduce traffic!"
Who told you that the plans are to reduce traffic? They will price some motorists out of the cars - thus hoping to reduce congestion. But did you see the vid? did you notice about the same number of vehicles on both sides of the road? Only one side will be charged and that is only if they have crossed a toll boundary. Great congestion system!!
Andy2, Manchester (14/11/2008 at 15:22)
Bigfoot (14/11/2008 at 15:44)
Mark,Radcliffe. (14/11/2008 at 15:59)