MANCHESTER Airport has seen a dramatic fall in passengers and airlines with 2,500 fewer flights per month.
More than 500 international services have been withdrawn as airlines struggle in the current economic climate, including around 200 long-haul flights.
And last month, almost 200,000 fewer passengers passed through the airport than in October 2007.
Bmi became the latest firm to axe its long-haul flights yesterday .
Its daily service to Chicago will take off for the last time in January. Las Vegas and Caribbean services will be cut after Easter - placing 140 jobs under threat.
British Airways' last long-haul flight from Manchester left for New York last weekend.
Both firms transferred their planes to Heathrow, blaming falling passenger numbers and increased competition from other operators.
It follows the collapse of XL airways and budget British long-haul carrier Zoo, which both operated transatlantic flights from Manchester.
Nigel Turner, bmi chief executive, said: "Our Manchester long haul services are unsustainable.
"They've never performed to the levels we had hoped. Chicago has been at best a moderate success up to this year.
"However, a combination of higher fuel prices, increased competition and the impact of open skies at Heathrow has had a serious negative impact on its viability."
He told staff Manchester `cannot deliver the levels of premium business that are available from the London market' and Manchester passengers were `buying purely on price'.
Its two Airbus A330 planes will now operate to Cairo and Amman from Heathrow.
Overall there were 2,454 fewer flights in October 2008 than the same month the previous year and some 194,578 passengers. Domestic, charter and private services have also been cut.
The number of long-haul aircraft movements fell from 2,003 to 1,850 in a comparison between the same months - before bmi axed 48 and BA 28.
But international scheduled flight passenger numbers actually increased by 6,530.
Tourism bosses have rejected fears the cuts will reduce visitor numbers.
Andrew Stokes, chief executive of Marketing Manchester, said: "North America is one of our primary markets.
"While this is undeniably disappointing news, Manchester's long-haul route network to the US is still very impressive.
"US visitors, who are the fourth most important in terms of numbers for Greater Manchester, will still find we're accessible.
"All airlines are finding it tough at the moment so it was inevitable that where there's competition on a route there is going to be an issue.
"This decision will strengthen the position of the other transatlantic operators."
Seven airlines - Continental, US Airways, Delta, American Airlines, Virgin, PIA and Thomas Cook - still operate direct flights to the US from Manchester, a total of 50 a week.
Bmi, owned by Lufthansa, has started a 90-day consultation period with all union and staff. Many will be offered jobs at Heathrow.
Manchester Airport, owned by Greater Manchester's ten local authorities, now serves 51 long haul destinations and 218 destinations worldwide.
A Manchester Airport Group spokesman said: "We are obviously disappointed.
"But the aviation market is shrinking due to the global economic climate and Manchester Airport is not immune.
"The destinations affected by bmi's decision are already served by Manchester Airport, with the exception of Antigua."
Customers with post-April bookings will be offered alternative flights.
Other Bmi services are unaffected.
Brian Simpson MEP, Labour's transport spokesman for the European Parliament, said: "I find it very disappointing that no British airline now flies full scheduled services across the Atlantic from Manchester.
"This leaves the market open to the Americans and also forces passengers from the north to use the unsatisfactory airport that is Heathrow."
Tweet
Airport flights plummet
November 06, 2008

Showing comments 1 to 17 and replies | View All
Trumpetman21 (06/11/2008 at 08:14)
But at least the 'greens' will be pleased.
Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (06/11/2008 at 09:00)
Doesn't merit the Metrolink extension then. That'll save a bit of money!!!!
abbott71, bolton (06/11/2008 at 10:00)
?Me and my family have not flown for nearly 3 yrs now because of that..yet we still travel abroad 2/3 times a yr!!!!!!less hassle and more enjoyable
...if we do fly..we use the eurostar and getter cheaper flights abroad,from other capitals without hte hassle of security checks!
Frequent Flyer, Altrincham (06/11/2008 at 10:04)
Octavius Tinsworth Ace (06/11/2008 at 10:10)
The cutting of services to the U.S. is more worrying. How on earth can Manchester be expected to attract American business when there aren't any scheduled flights? I would like to see more regulation of flights to and from all regional cities, possibly with incentives for airlines to maintain scheduled services to particular destinations. If a city is accessible, it's more likely to attract investment and ultimately pay for itself, surely?
Lizzie Tickles Little Lad, A-u-L, Lancashire (06/11/2008 at 10:37)
" Manchester Airport Group spokesman said: "We are obviously disappointed."
I bet it would have been a bad time to ask him: In view of the fact that BAA (who run Heathrow) are giving £230 million to improve transport links, How much is Manchester giving to improve them here?
Edina Clouds, GREAT Manchester (06/11/2008 at 11:19)
chris (06/11/2008 at 11:50)
we came through the other week and they were 3 guys trying to deal with over 300 people....its not as if we all surprised them, then know when the planes are landing and how many people will be on them.
apparently its always like that, how the airport management cant plan for that is beyond me. muppets.
Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (06/11/2008 at 12:20)
They will be attracted by the lack of congestion and the shiny new trams to Wythenshawe and Oldham Town Centre.
Maybe they could run the airport like a proper airport. Whenever I can I go via Liverpool as it is a much nicer airport. Easier to park. Less hassle. Smaller Queues.
Betty's Hotpot, Cheadle (06/11/2008 at 12:34)
Priscilla Queen of the Desert, Central Manchester (06/11/2008 at 15:31)
Edina Clouds, GREAT Manchester
6/11/2008 at 11:19
Well clearly you didn’t read the article very well. There are tons of long haul destinations served directly from Manchester. The removal of these BMI services does not reduce the choice of destinations offered by Manchester Airport (with the exception of Antigua) because other airlines already fly to those destinations anyway.
Directdestinations from Manchester include:
New York JFK
New York Newark
Philadelphia
Chicago
Atlanta
Las Vegas
Durham/Raleigh, North Carolina
Toronto
Vancouver
Calgary
Hamilton, Ontario
Barbados
Sharm-El-Sheik
Dubai
Abu Dhabi
Doha
Jeddah
Riyadh
Islamabad
Karachi
Lahore
Singapore
Tell me, are all these in Europe?
Rob Holmes (06/11/2008 at 18:01)
The long term strategy of the airport is in tatters. Over the last two decades the airport has lost direct flights to Australia, India, South Africa, The Seychelles, Mauritius, and Moscow to name but a few. Flights have been cut to many European cities including capitals all of which have daily flights from Liverpool or the East Midlands. Flights to the USA have been decimated. The management were trying to get BMI to take over the BA New York Flights. The resulting vote of confidence is the removal of all US flights. American Airlines used to have 2 or 3 flights a day from Manchester. This winter they will have 5 a week. The daily Air Canada flight was absent this summer. Singapore Airlones are reducing their service from daily to 5 a week. The list goes on.
It is about time the MAG board began to act in the interests of its shareholders. We used to have the worlds best airport on our doorstep. Sadly this is no longer nowhere near so.
Paul (06/11/2008 at 23:00)
licandven (08/11/2008 at 21:30)
Bury Pensioner., Bury. (08/11/2008 at 23:01)
angry_harry, sale (09/11/2008 at 15:48)
self_loading_frieght, sale (09/11/2008 at 15:53)