A MAJOR airline is pulling all its transatlantic flights from Manchester Airport and cutting around 140 jobs.
Bmi, which is Britain's second biggest carrier, will stop its services to Chicago, Las Vegas and the Caribbean from January and April next year respectively.
The news comes as a blow to the airport just a week after the final British Airways transatlantic flight to New York took off. In a letter to staff, bmi chief executive Nigel Turner said Manchester 'cannot deliver the levels of premium business that are available from the London market'.
He said passengers flying from Manchester were 'buying purely on price' leading to disappointing revenues for the airline's 'best-in-class product'.
The two Airbus A330 planes which are used on the routes will now operate on flights to Cairo and Amman from Heathrow. Mr Turner said: "To meet the clear demand for existing and future growth from London, we will transfer our two Manchester-based Airbus A330 wide-bodied aircraft to London, Heathrow. Consequently services from Manchester to Chicago will terminate on January 14, and services to Las Vegas, Barbados and Antigua will terminate after Easter 2009.
Job cuts
"We have been operating long haul services from Manchester since 2001, primarily as a result of our inability at that time to serve the USA from our main base at Heathrow.
"However, long haul services from Manchester has never performed to the levels that we had hoped and we see little prospect of change or improvements in their performance."
Up to 140 Manchester Airport-based jobs will be cut, mostly cabin crew, onboard chefs, supervisors and cabin service managers, as well as ground crew. Many will be offered positions at Heathrow.
Staff are being informed today, with managers flying to its US bases to explain the decision. German airline Lufthansa took control of bmi (formerly British Midland) last week, adding to its 30 per cent stake by buying bmi chairman Sir Michael Bishop's 50 per cent stake in the airline for around £318 million.
Bmi has 4,300 employees and last year had a turnover of £1,023m. The long haul services from Manchester began in 2001. They operate daily to Chicago, three times a week to Las Vegas, twice a week to Barbados and once a week to Antigua.
A spokesman from Manchester Airports Group, said: "We are obviously disappointed with the news from bmi but as we are all aware, the aviation market is shrinking as a result of the global economic climate and Manchester Airport is not immune.
Anticipated
"We fully anticipated today's announcement. We do, however, need to put this in context. The destinations affected by bmi's decision are already served by other airlines at Manchester Airport so passengers wanting to travel to those are still able to do so with the exception of Antigua, that is a once-a-week additional leg on from Barbados.
"Manchester Airport still serves 52 long-haul destinations and 218 destinations worldwide. We've also had some good news this week with the arrival of a new airline, Air Sylhet, at Manchester Airport, operating services to Dubai and an additional four new destinations in India through Brussels Airlines."
The final BA Manchester to New York flight took off on October 25. It was the firm's last remaining direct international service from an airport outside London. The only flights BA now offers from regional British airports are shuttle services to Heathrow and Gatwick. A BA spokesman said the 44-year-old service to JFK Airport had been axed due to falling passenger numbers as a result of increased competition from other transatlantic carriers. US airlines Delta and Continental still operate transatlantic services from Manchester.

Showing comments 1 to 22 and replies | View All
kendomat, Salford (05/11/2008 at 13:36)
Blip, Manchester (05/11/2008 at 13:43)
Viewer of Life, Stockport (05/11/2008 at 14:05)
Trumpetman21 (05/11/2008 at 14:25)
Exactly how Big Brother wants it - easier to keep an eye on the proletariat that way.
Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (05/11/2008 at 14:36)
Manchester is an excellent Regional City and it should never forget that, whist busy trying to blow billions on imitating London's infrastructure.
If the demand is there, the flights would not be scrapped.
Geolives, manchester (05/11/2008 at 14:44)
North - Thrifty - turn right.
Result; flights from Manchester make no money, even though they are 85 per cent full. Flights from south often leave half empty in cattle class with a full premium cabin, result; big profit. Its simple economics but economy passengers actually cost airlines money, so who can blame them!
Pravda (05/11/2008 at 14:54)
2 days it took me to get there and blatant lies from his staff also who never re-contacted myself to say when the flight had been re-scheduled for. Good riddance.
john murray (05/11/2008 at 15:09)
Mad Angela, St George's, Hulme , (05/11/2008 at 15:34)
Viewer of Life, Stockport (05/11/2008 at 15:59)
“Far be it from me to say that Manchester is not a "World Class" City, but if it was, do you think these people would have left”. - So how come the Germans can run a major airport from Frankfurt and Munich. Italians have Rome, and Milan(2). The US can run airports in Houston, Philadelphia, New York, LA, Atlanta, Chicago, Boston, San Francisco et al. I could go on.
Geolives, Manchester
You are partially right, but BA could make Manchester a full regional hub, removing the flights from London, which they will not do. For example if they cut flights to the US from London and went via Manchester (right direction) how would that be??
For you both. The CBI/Government report recently said London’s airport capacity is seriously inhibiting London’s ability to be a world-class city and should reduce flights by 15%.
Scott F (05/11/2008 at 16:01)
Quite simply the small numbers of high yield travellers in Manchester either are so wealthy they use private jets or are too few and far between to make it worthwhile.
Quite simply Manchester is a low cost market with people who can't afford to pay or aren't interested in paying for quality air travel. Under those conditions, it is being left to the US carriers who specialise in doing it all cheap and nasty. If people don't care about the seats they sit on or the service they get, only price, they get what they pay for.
Bean B4, manchester (05/11/2008 at 16:22)
"Manchester is an excellent Regional City and it should never forget that, whist busy trying to blow billions on imitating London's infrastructure."
That includes the introduction of the silly congestion charge and a pathetic attempot an integrated transport system.
Viewer of Life, Stockport (05/11/2008 at 17:53)
Recently I had to fly to two major European cities (Rome and Madrid), I could fly to neither from Manchester direct.
We need someone to start campaigning on behalf the airport to re-distribute flights to Man.
philten (05/11/2008 at 19:45)
that's where all the money
alway's goe's.forget
the congestion charge it's
just another stealth.Philten
mike , usa (06/11/2008 at 01:59)
Suz Ackerman (06/11/2008 at 13:13)
The new business class seats suffered so many defects that on both occasions when I flew in June (6 months after they were introduced) 3 seats were not working and couldn't be used and the seats only had 3 positions.
Might these have had something to do with people not using BMI?
Having said that, the end of these services further loses us credibility as the second city and coupled with the Manchester airport changes look like a cheap and nasty provincial town.
An American, Manchester (06/11/2008 at 23:47)
Audenshaw Bob (07/11/2008 at 06:08)
Benedict, Cheshire (07/11/2008 at 07:06)
I used to think it was an excellent airport but the lounges are like cheap shopping centres or amusement arcades. I always have to wait ages for my baggage, invariably there is a plane already at the gate so the plane can't get in.
angry_harry, sale (09/11/2008 at 15:25)
Anthony Ashworth (23/11/2008 at 10:07)
Chocolate, Manchester. (24/11/2008 at 07:41)
Audenshaw Bob,
So Manchester are forcing the congestion charge in order to be greener.
Great, instead of Manchester being a world class city, the council are actually ruining it.
Soon there will be nothing in Manchester.
We need to expand up north or we will lose out big time.