TEN Downing Street has snubbed a 2,600-signature petition demanding that all trains crossing Stockport's iconic viaduct should stop at the town's railway station as required by a 168-year-old Act of Parliament.
Arriva CrossCountry, which operates the franchise for trains running from Manchester to Birmingham, the south coast, south Wales and the Westcountry, will now axe 25 Stockport services from the onset of the new timetable on December 14.
The current 57 CrossCountry trains stopping at Stockport will be reduced by 13 southbound and 12 northbound as the Stockport-Birmingham link is cut back to just one an hour.
When the proposed cuts were revealed earlier this year, protest groups including Stockport council and Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce and posted a petition on Downing Street's website.
It noted that to "compensate" the people of Stockport, whose town centre is dominated by the viaduct - one of the largest brick structures in Europe - Parliament required all trains crossing it to stop to pick up or set down passengers at Edgeley station at the southern end of the 27-arch 111ft high bridge.
And the petition branded the Department of Transport's decision to let rail companies ignore the Act "unacceptable".
Downing Street's response, however, gave protesters the thumbs down.
The government claims that CrossCountry's franchise specification "strikes a balance" between responses from consultation, operational effectiveness, passenger and commercial demand.
The 2008 timetable was developed to "make room" for extra trains on Virgin's multi-billion pound West Coast main line upgrade, a CrossCountry spokesman said.
When the petition was launched, Stockport council's transport chief Coun David White complained: ""The last thing we need in terms of regenerating Stockport is less train services. And in my opinion any company that wishes to travel across the viaduct, which was campaigned for by the people of Stockport back in 1840 and is still maintained by the people of Stockport today, should uphold the law and have the decency to provide services to the people of Stockport."
Tweet
Downing St. snubs Stockport
November 03, 2008
Stockport viaduct

Showing comments 1 to 9 and replies | View All
Jay B, oldham (03/11/2008 at 09:32)
look at what the government thinks of the northwest!
all they care about is taking our money away in more tax.
not providing us with better public transport!
Albert Bino (03/11/2008 at 09:46)
Steve (03/11/2008 at 12:01)
Alan Tidman (03/11/2008 at 12:45)
mike beirne (04/11/2008 at 16:20)
This is done to reduce the cost of manning the trains with ticket inspectors and has nothing to do with improving the service. They are externalizing the costs by reducing the standard of service.
I could understand the decision if the trains were just passing through. This leaves passengers having to wait around, for upto half an hour, for a train that they are allowed to get on. In that time two or three other trains will stop at the station to let passengers off, but passengers are not allowed to get on them.
The service has deteriorated considerably by since the introduction of this strategy.
misters (04/11/2008 at 17:33)
The ticket collectors at Manchester Picadilly are some of the rudest and disagreeable oiks I have ever had the misfortune to interract with. If I were a Mancunian I would be embarrassed for that to be the first impression of my city that greets visitors.
Sack them, employ guards on these trains, then they can stop at Stockport and everyone's happy.
IanJ, Blackrod (04/11/2008 at 17:53)
This is exactly why the TIF bid cannot be allowed to go through.
If the government have no respect for an Act of Parliament, do you honestly think they will honour any of the false promises in the TIF bid?
Gringo The Mexican Mancunian (04/11/2008 at 17:56)
To be honest though, I think Downing St may have a point, have you been to Stockport recently its probably doing Joe Public a favour.
Carl Wainwright (13/12/2008 at 23:15)
theres no proof of it anywhere