CABINET minister James Purnell has apologised after leaving confidential papers from a Manchester MP on a train.
Mr Purnell - who is MP for Stalybridge and Hyde - lost the documents from his 'red box' during a journey from Macclesfield to London Euston.
They included a letter from Gorton MP Gerald Kaufman about one of his constituents, plus correspondence relating to the case.
The documents were returned three days later after being picked up by a fellow passenger. Mr Purnell, the work and pensions secretary, has apologised for the 'mistake'.
The loss was one of three data-loss episodes to hit the government in recent days.
It emerged yesterday that a computer memory stick, carrying the details of user names and passwords for a key government computer system, had been left in a pub car park.
Last week, a civil servant was fined £2,500 for leaving papers on a train. In that case Richard Jackson admitted negligence and was fined for a breach of the Official Secrets Act after he left classified documents relating to al-Qaeda and Iraq on a train.
Gordon Brown said he was 'concerned' by recent incidents with important data.
The prime minister added that Mr Purnell would be "as concerned as me that rules for the future ensure that these things cannot happen."
The Information Commissioner, Richard Thomas, reported last week that there had been 277 information breaches in the last year. Eighty related to the private sector, 75 to the NHS and other health bodies, 28 involved central government, 26 local councils, and 47 concerned the rest of the public sector.
A spokeswoman for Mr Purnell said: "This was one letter from an MP with the attached correspondence and was returned safely within three days. Obviously, James is very sorry for the mistake."
Tweet
MP apologises over 'lost' letter
November 02, 2008
James Purnell MP

Showing comments 1 to 8 and replies | View All
Mad Angela, St George's, Hulme , (02/11/2008 at 18:02)
Buzz, Moston (02/11/2008 at 21:14)
The Royal Mail handle millions of letters every year and they lose an extremely small percentage.
He was entrusted with this data and actually lost 100% of it.
J.Hall, Tameside (02/11/2008 at 22:26)
You dropped the first comment from a reader,you would not include my comment,and it all smacks of deliberate media bias which is not the role of a Greater Manchester Newspaper whose task is to be objective and allow all sides of the spectrum to comment.
Your reporters are obviously well harnessed along with MEN
editors.
S P In exile, Tameside (03/11/2008 at 08:10)
Chris Green, Chorlton-cum-Hardy (03/11/2008 at 09:58)
dave pickup (03/11/2008 at 16:45)
markyboy, manchester (04/11/2008 at 19:23)
last nite i tried to post another message about this story, but that too was canned.
obviously the MEN dont like free speech?. in my first and second postings there was nothing offensive or inappropriate,except the MEN editor is having his strings pulled and doesnt like critiscism from readers.
LogicalLion (05/11/2008 at 00:26)