CYCLISTS are being urged to use leafy suburban routes as an alternative to main roads in a bid to cut Manchester's 'shocking' number of bike accidents.
We revealed the city's most dangerous cycle routes last month as new figures showed cyclists are involved in nearly five crashes a week.
Now Manchester council has highlighted sweeping changes after doubling its spending on cycle schemes since 2005 - from £300,000 to about £590,000 this year. The new signed `quiet routes' take cyclists through leafy residential streets, parks and across university land.
They offer safer and more scenic ways into the city, rather than cyclists competing for space on busy main roads.
The planned changes also include solar-powered ground lights, raised paths and contraflow routes.
Mark Stevenson, of the council cycling team, said: "Cyclists are less intimidated on quieter roads.
"Some people want a more pleasant and enjoyable experience, while others will want to take the quickest route. Now they have the choice.
"Cities like Manchester were built for the car, so a lot of routes developed as urban motorways. But in the last three years, there has been a significant increase in priorities for pedestrians and cyclists. Funding has gone up to reflect this."
Manchester got its first raised cycle path two years ago, segregated from traffic by a railing along a small stretch of Wilmslow Road. But the M.E.N. revealed the road still had the highest number of accidents in the city over the last three years.
Now raised paths will be extended along the road, reducing accidents and discouraging unthinking drivers from parking on them.
The council also plans to embed solar lights at 10-metre intervals on the road, from Fallowfield to Withington, as most accidents happen after dark.
Across Manchester, more segregated paths and improved road markings will make cars more aware of bikes and when to give way to cyclists.
Mr Stevenson said: "We want to reduce the conflicts between cars and bicycles, which a lot of people identify as the reason they don't want to cycle.
"If they aren't confident cyclists, they worry about taking on cars on main roads."
The new routes are under consultation. See manchester.gov.uk for consultation details or go to cyclegm.org to order route maps for your area.
A journey planner including the fastest, most scenic or least busy routes will be added to the site next year.
City's most dangerous cycle routes.
Tweet
Cyclists steered to the suburbs
November 01, 2008
M.E.N reporter fay Schlesinger with Cllr Emily Lomax.

Showing comments 1 to 15 and replies | View All
PW, Manchester (01/11/2008 at 06:41)
ebble, manchester (01/11/2008 at 09:39)
As for using sideroads and paths, that defeats the best advantage of cycle commuting - saving time.
Chapman (01/11/2008 at 10:18)
Ace Shakespeare , manchester (01/11/2008 at 10:35)
Why hasnt the cars funding gone up to fund better roads and better road surfaces ect? the roads over the last few years have damaged my car where is my help for damage to the shock obsorbers ect.If cyclists want more let them pay extra taxes "like a roadfund and a small insurance ect".The driver always gets hit with the cost.
citycentre, manchester (01/11/2008 at 12:27)
i knew the romans and latter the victorians were forward thinking, but that really is impressive
ace, many cyclists have insurance, however like that for cars it is with private companies and in no way contributes to the quality of roads
David /2 (01/11/2008 at 12:54)
Everybody will be a pedestrian or cyclist in the future as the world's oil runs out.
ebble, manchester (01/11/2008 at 16:22)
What is the point of cycle lanes that people are allowed to park on? Also most cycle lanes are painted in such thick, poorly applied paint that they are very bumpy. I never ride in them and therefore often ride further out into the road than if the cycle lane wasn't there.
And the government is so disorganised about cycling. It claims it wants to encourage it, but when I recently worked at a Civil Service office block in Chorlton there was no bike shed, no showers or any other facilites. There used to be a bike shed but it had been demolished in a recent refurbishment. And when I asked about the government's own Cycle To Work scheme I was told that the Department of Work and Pensions, the government department I worked for, was not an employer that had chosen to take part in the scheme!
Andy, Wythenshawe (01/11/2008 at 19:03)
Motorists (of which I am one) pay VED for the privilege of driving a motorised vehicle, if you don't want to pay ... get a bike , or a horse.
The 'raised' cycle lanes in Fallowfield are illegally parked on by law breaking motorists and taxi drivers, they are the same motorists that don't drive in the bus lanes when they are allowed to, they haven't got a clue or couldn't a proverbial.
Ace Shakespeare , manchester (02/11/2008 at 14:33)
Youve answered your own question "You pay VED to drive your car on the roads" But tell where it says "Your car and bike"? It dosnt mention bikes .So lets start to charge bikes for wearing out the roads and the cost that the cyclist cost the motorists.And we need to register cycles that use the roads and have number plates And insurance Etc.And while we are at it,lets have a simple road test for people who use the roads as well as cars.
Black Flag (02/11/2008 at 16:19)
Are you saying that some motorists are not paying their way too? Are you saying that those drivers should be paying more to use the roads?
Andy, Wythenshawe (02/11/2008 at 20:10)
The bigger and more polluting vehicle the more tax you pay.
Some cars don't pay VED, and because cycling is a desirable form of transport the government wishes to encourage they are also not taxed.
Lets tax pedestrians for wearing out the pavements as well eh!!!
BTW cyclists don’t WONT to cycle off the main roads, they are being forced by reckless motorists and the failings of Manchester council and the Police to control them.
chris (02/11/2008 at 22:25)
Haaaaaaaaaaa
muppet
citycentre, manchester (03/11/2008 at 09:15)
"lets start to charge bikes for wearing out the roads and the cost that the cyclist cost the motorists"
ok, how much wear do you think a bike causes to the roads?
by that thinking cyclists should be paid for not driving but using bikes instead, and saving damage to your road surface.
where do i claim my money?
PAH , Manchester (03/11/2008 at 09:41)
Ace Shakespeare , manchester (01/12/2008 at 16:37)