A MAJOR company involved in the battle to stop Manchester's planned congestion charge, has been accused of trying to tell its workers how to respond to an official public consultation.
Employees of cereal giant Kellogg's, which has a key site in Trafford Park, have been sent emails suggesting they can 'cut and paste' reasons to object to the controversial scheme from a anti-charge campaign website backed by the Greater Manchester Momentum Group - of which it is a leading member.
A spokesman for the rival pro-campaign said: "It is astonishing that a major multi national company like Kellogg's should tell their staff that the appropriate way to respond to an official consultation is to cut and paste their employer's opinions."
Chris Wermann, communications director for the US-owned company, who sent out the email to around 1,000 workers in Manchester denied any attempts to influence their views.
He said: "When so much is at stake, we believe we have a clear duty to keep our staff up to date about the planned charge, the implications, and the referendum which is coming up at the end of the year.
"Unite, the union which operates at our site has already made it clear that it is opposed to the charge, and is likewise giving out information to its members."
Campaign
Mr Wemann's email directs staff to the no campaign website and says: "If you would like to follow our position please go to www.stopthecharge.co.uk and you can cut and paste the reasons why you don't feel the scheme is right for Manchester."
He said: "I stand by the email I sent out. I made it quite clear that there is absolutely no pressure on staff to vote one way or the other. It is totally up to them what they do."
Kellogg's, one of the region's most famous companies, was one of the first big names to announce its opposition to the congestion charge early this year.
The company which employs 1,000 people at two Manchester sites, says the charge would make life too hard for its staff and too difficult to ship cereals from its Trafford Park plant.
Kellogg's says it welcomes proposals to invest £3bn in Greater Manchester's public transport system, but says it cannot support the charge which has to be approved to get the government cash.
Yes campaigners who launched their formal fight a month ago, are hoping to convince voters to back the move, arguing that the offer is an exceptional opportunity to revolutionise the region's public transport system.
The public will get the chance to vote on the plans, which include a £5 peak hour, weekday charge, in December.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Iain Monks (04/10/2008 at 12:21)
Wallace Anderson (04/10/2008 at 12:32)
Like I assume most people in Manchester I have recieved the information from Greater Manchester Future Transport.
I have given my response to them as they requested.
I do not need to be persuaded to vote yes by advertisements.
So if Kellogs can't do it then take down all the "yes2 advertising also
Pentest 2, Hyde (04/10/2008 at 12:35)
And at least they aren't putting a Rochdale pensioner on a advertising campaign, no doubt at the local tax payers expense.
Good on ya Kellog's, I for one supprt you wholeheartedly.
Frostee, Oldham (04/10/2008 at 12:51)
lizard (04/10/2008 at 13:09)
What arrogance! to declare the wrong in Kellogs reaction to the abuse of its people when the opposition does exactly that in its "in your face campaign" using images of "its people"... "scraping the barrel" here me thinks!.
It gives me an image of a group of infantile pro campaigners "squweeming and squweeming until they get what they want!...grow up!.
NS (04/10/2008 at 13:09)
Pennine NHS Trust polled their employees and they found that 25 to 1 were against the TIF plans and this was amongst people in Oldham and Rochdale which are supposedly two boroughs which are most strongly in favour of TIF!
Referendum here we come...
alvinlwh (04/10/2008 at 13:12)
Donna. Harpurhey (04/10/2008 at 13:36)
Cllr Ken Hulme, Delph (04/10/2008 at 13:53)
It seems Yes campaign supporters can't cope with any opposition to the bandwagon they are trying to get going. I'm sure Kellog employees are more than capable of listening to both sides and making up their own minds.
I'm undecided but I do think the Yes campaign are doing themselves no favours with their expensive & over the top PR campaign
lbc, Trafford Park Village (04/10/2008 at 14:02)
Many ordinary people are busy working and looking after their families and do not appreciate how easy it is to make their voices heard with their MPs and Councillors. All employers big and small should point the way, just like Kellog's, so that all of us use the voice and vote we have in a democratic society. It is no good saying "oh, the Council will go ahead and do what they want, regardless" -
because if we all stick together and vote "no", we can overcome the bullying tactics from both National & Local Government. Manchester deserves 1.2 Billion Pounds from the Treasury to help with investment in public transport, we should not be bullied into having to take out an additional loan of 1.5 Billion over 30 years that will be a millstone around all our necks.
Hope all the other companies in Greater Manchester are doing the same ! We too have informed all of our staff and associates about what they can do to register their opinion!!
Languages for Business Centre Ltd.
shayla (04/10/2008 at 15:08)
I don't know of any work colleague, customer, freind or associate who supports this charge.
I reckon 98% of people will vote NO.
But I also reckon they will find a way to manipulate the fugures to their advantage.
NO ! TO THE CON CHARGE - IT'S A TAX ON GETTING TO WORK!
Pippa, Manchester (04/10/2008 at 15:27)
PW, Manchester (04/10/2008 at 15:34)
Remember, our country waged an aggressive war because of "irrefutable" evidence that Iraq was threatening us with WMDs. If that regime can lie over a matter that killed hundreds of thousands of people, then they won't flinch at doing the same thing to pick your pockets.
Kelloggs are looking after their business and the interests of their staff. Vote no, and tell them to go to hell!
ebble, manchester (04/10/2008 at 18:17)
I'll change from my favourite Weetabix to Kellogs Corn Flakes for a week to celebrate Kellogs sensible attitude to this nasty, cynical, money grabbing tax.
Grief Tourist, Trumpton (04/10/2008 at 20:21)
alanp, chorlton (04/10/2008 at 20:36)
Buzza2008, Oldham (04/10/2008 at 22:00)
I have to agree with Cllr Hulme that they are doing themselves no favours. And considering the large amounts of money and expensive presentations promoting a very one sided and very biased campaign I think they are losing it. They have treated the public with utter contempt and the public are increasingly suspicious of a campaign that says just 10% will be paying the bill.
Why won’t they allow the anti-charge side equal access to public money so that we can have a fair open and democratic debate? Who knows TIF might be good for Manchester but there is a phalanx of question that remain unanswered and only a grown up and open debate is going to unlock those answers.
Rammylad (04/10/2008 at 22:13)
Shame on MEN for trying their best to race this down their list of stories. Exactly how many seconds did it spend as the number 1 story.
Ronnie Silver (05/10/2008 at 00:19)
Chess Piece Face, Manchester (05/10/2008 at 01:32)
A Bus Driver (05/10/2008 at 08:51)
£2250 a year PAYCUT - NO THANKS - Paul Teeque (05/10/2008 at 10:20)
££££££ is being spent on the YES message in local papers, billboards etc
No money for the other side of the story and when a company does the right thing such as kellogs they cry its unfair - DISGUSTING.
Mark,Radcliffe. (05/10/2008 at 12:38)
Ski, Stockport (05/10/2008 at 13:35)
I think Kellogg's have every right to inform there workers in what they think, it is there jobs after all that is in question.
Lawrence Glendinning (05/10/2008 at 14:14)
The best one I seen today (in Shaw) 'I wont be paying as Im driving the other way'
So therefore this perosn should not even get a vote.