The traditional sign on the door of the Gents has been temporarily replaced with one that says 'toilets with urinals'.
And the sign on the Ladies now simply says 'toilets' in a move to make the lavatories more inclusive for trans-gender students.
The signs on the toilets in the basement of Manchester University students' union were changed after a meeting of the union's executive in the summer.
It is thought the temporary ones will be replaced with permanent new signs in the near future.
Jennie Killip, women's officer at the students' union, put forward the idea of installing the new signs after receiving complaints from trans-gender students about the facilities.
She said: "The idea is that trans-gender people feel more comfortable using their student union.
"Trans-gender people can face violence and abuse when they go into toilets and we wanted to provide a place where they can feel comfortable.
"I have had complaints from people who said we didn't have any facilities for them."
The toilets are outside a club in the basement of the Steve Biko student union building, on Oxford Road.
Gender-neutral
Minutes from the union's executive meeting in July said: "The women's officer asked if any action could be taken following the directive from the council to look into gender-neutral toilets in the union.
"After discussion, the women's officer felt the solution would be to change the signs on one set of toilets in the building to `with urinals' and `without urinals' with explanatory signage.
"She felt the basement would be the most appropriate area to trial this. This was agreed."
Thousands of first-year students have been starting their university careers in the past few days as Freshers' Week got into full swing.
Second-year literature and linguistics student Jane McConnell, 19, is a news editor on the Student Direct student newspaper.
She said: "While these signs might be appropriate for people with different sexualities in the community of the University of Manchester, I also think that many people from different religious and ethnic groups are going to feel uncomfortable using these facilities.
"I think they might believe the university union aren't reflecting their beliefs and choices and that they are going to feel very uncomfortable using these toilets.
"Even though they're just two signs, at the end of the day, toilets should be for women and for men specifically, not for both."
Another student, who did not want to be named, said: "This is ridiculous.
"It is just too much political correctness.
"I can not believe they are changing the signs - everybody knows the traditional male and female toilet signs.
"It could lead to some confusion."
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
460
275
0
false
Tweet


Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
PW, Manchester (27/09/2008 at 08:06)
coolhead, Copenhagen (27/09/2008 at 09:24)
Steve Bilko Building..., transgender toilet signs. One could hardly make it up ! Or is it RAG week already ?
Halfway in, I fully expected Dave Spart to be quoted as the Union spokesman (or spokescomrade).
Thanks. Cheered me up no end !
Frostee, Oldham (27/09/2008 at 09:52)
Felix, manchester uk (27/09/2008 at 09:52)
neil sk6 (27/09/2008 at 09:53)
Mark,Radcliffe. (27/09/2008 at 09:54)
The Seeker, Eccles (27/09/2008 at 10:19)
seth robinson (27/09/2008 at 12:17)
thaitanium (27/09/2008 at 12:40)
Could he be related to the Sgt Ernie Bilko I loved so much years ago in black and white (is it OK to say black and white?) on the TV as in television not "transgendered" whatever that is
The Original BLUE Donut, Manchester (27/09/2008 at 13:31)
The Original BLUE Donut, Manchester (27/09/2008 at 13:47)
acky, stockport (27/09/2008 at 13:53)
Mike, Manchester (27/09/2008 at 15:55)
ebble, manchester (27/09/2008 at 16:46)
They might as well be prepared in some small way for the lunacies of political correctness.
Joseph Razavi (27/09/2008 at 17:30)
My problem would actually be that, for people who care about how toilets are labelled, this solution isn't PC enough. I admit I don't know much about it (I had to wiki "heteronormative"), but isn't any two-group gender separation system going to mislabel or upset someone?
Ultimately, this is useful because real requests for such a labelling have been voiced, I'd just be concerned that it would marginalise some hypothetical smaller, quieter, minority.
The best solution of course would come from a complete reanalysis of the problem. It then becomes obvious that we need three kinds of toilet: "exhibitionist" and "voyeur", (separated from eachother by a one-way mirror), and then "others".
;P
dave pickup (27/09/2008 at 17:35)
Stop it Dave,I don't know if I am a man/woman/thing any more!!
Get a life you lot.
Octavius Tinsworth Ace (27/09/2008 at 17:48)
I have to say, of all the examples of political correctness and tokenism, this is possibly the most ludicrous and futile I've seen.
The Seeker, Eccles (27/09/2008 at 18:14)
Andrew Jameson (27/09/2008 at 18:50)
Im sure many women would not feel very comfortable and possibly vunerable with sharing a toilet with a members of the opposite sex.
Although I understand that trans-gender people may feel uncomfortable with having to choose which toilets to use, Im sure more people will be offended by the changes than the good it is meant to make.
David,North M/C (27/09/2008 at 21:40)
Rachel, Bolton (27/09/2008 at 22:19)
Joe C (27/09/2008 at 22:51)
This isn't about anything more than a simple relabelling for the benefit - yes, benefit! - of those who don't identify as male or female, or those who are uncomfortable with the gender binary. And trust me, there are a lot more than the 'it's all political correctness gone mad' brigade would have you believe!
This is a matter of putting a new sign on a single toilet facility, so that those who don't wish to use the male/female facilities in the rest of the building can use their students' union without fear of abuse.
The "many people from different religious and ethnic groups" who are referred to in this article and in this week's Student Direct editorial don't seem to have voiced any opinion themselves - so who are they? Do they even exist? Sounds like desperate fishing around for excuses to me. In any case, if they don't want to use them, there are plenty of other facilities available throughout the building.
Why not embrace diversity and freedom of sexuality for once?
Sparky was the best ever (27/09/2008 at 22:57)
Let's be honest; If you're a woman and a man dressed like a woman has free reign to walk into your public bathrooms, you're likely to be concerned, even if they don't do it
It's more BS, catering for people that don't necessarily ask for it, at the expense of the majority, who have to degrade their standard of living to accommodate the change they never wanted.
umpire 2, Salford M7 4HT (27/09/2008 at 23:02)
Let us get our lives back
Sparky was the best ever (27/09/2008 at 23:09)
Don't you mean 6 toilets: 1 for men. 1 for women, 1 for transexual men who don't want to be in a mixed gender toilet with transexual women who don't want to be in a mixed gender toilet and a toilet for homosexual men, so heterosexual men won't be uncomfortable and one for homosexual women, so heterosexual women won't be uncomfortable.
If a chicken tied on a fake beak, jumped in a pond and tried to swim like a duck, it is it's own fault it looks stupid and drowns, because it's still a freakin chicken.
The gender you're born with is the gender you die with, no matter what fake body parts you have. It's simple enough to have 2 toilets, 1 for each gender and let the others choose between looking different in their real genders toilet, or breaking the law in the other.
It was their choice to begin with; Live with it.