DAMAGED records of life during Manchester's industrial boom are to be deciphered using hi-tech forensic cameras.
The technology of crime scene investigations will be used to read the city's 1851 census - which was virtually destroyed by flood water from the Deansgate canal.
The manuscript contains details of more than 250,000 Manchester inhabitants, from novelist Elizabeth Gaskell to poisoner Ann Britland, the first woman hanged at Strangeways.
Also in the census are suffragette leader Lydia Becker and dialect poet Samuel Laycock.
The illegible records are preserved in their fragile state at the National Archives in Kew, but they will be brought out of storage to allow experts from website Ancestry.co.uk to examine them.
A forensic expert will search through thousands of permutations of light rays to find the combination that will reveal the currently invisible writing. The next step will be to digitally photograph the records and publish them online next year.
Simon Harper, managing director of Ancestry.co.uk, came up with the idea for the project, negotiated access to the records and secured funding.
He said: "For many people with ancestors living in Manchester at this time, the restoration means a significant missing piece of their family history can be solved.
"It's amazing that our technology now allows us to bring such records back to life.
"They will also shed light on the social make-up of the city, which was Britain's 19th century industrial hub. Large families living in crowded homes will contrast with industrial magnates living in splendour with servants and maids."
Also of interest to historians will be the recovered details of some of the city's better known sons and daughters.
Tweet
Shedding light on lost souls from 1851
September 23, 2008

Showing comments 1 to 10 and replies | View All
PW, Manchester (24/09/2008 at 08:28)
It was also tragic to see little Samuel or Mary aged 2, but they didn't appear in the next one 10 years later. That happened a lot because if you had a disease, you often kept it until it saw you off. We don't really know how fortunate we are. I hope this project is a success as it's the only way of remembering relatives otherwise long gone.
Mike, Manchester (24/09/2008 at 08:32)
Nick Narford, Manchester (24/09/2008 at 10:06)
I've been waiting for this for years as I'm missing a family link that i need to prove/disprove - they were living in Deansgate at the time I believe. Can't wait til these go online.
Saying that, I bet it's cost a fortune for Ancestry to do this - a bit of social responsibility shown which is nice from such a big company. They obviously feel like doing the people of Manchester a favour! Well done to them.
Nick
John Marsden (25/09/2008 at 17:31)
Sir Reginald Ringpull, A-u-L, Lancashire (25/09/2008 at 18:23)
Do a "Google" for: Family History Online. They also have the "unfilmed 1851 census". Some returns are so badly water damaged that they will never be transcribed though. (I have some of the 1851 CD's and street indexes but not Deansgate)
John Marsden (29/09/2008 at 09:08)
John Marsden
Pam Tunstall (29/09/2008 at 16:39)
marion mcmanus (29/09/2008 at 22:45)
These 1851 Census have been already been published by MLFHS with the help of many
HARD WORKING VOLUNTEERS.
I have some of these CD's
I would like to thank all the volunteers who gave up their spare time to Transcribe them.
What is Ancestry playing at???
Veronica Williams (01/10/2008 at 19:37)
I am amazed that this highjacking of material which has already been transcribed using the same sort of methods as has been announced both by MEN and the BBC. This work was undertaken about 10/14 years ago and completed by the MLFHS and who have had this data for sale on disks to the public for a very long time.
I cannot understand why some research was not done before publishing this article.
Perhaps in local people supported all the good work being done locally they would not have been surprised at this announcement.
As for Elizabeth Gaskells family that too was transcribed and nothing new.
As for the Deansgate canal I have never heard of it, but the photograph illustrating the "Deansgate Canal" appears to be of the Rochdale Canal.
Veronica
John Marsden (10/10/2008 at 10:25)
John Marsden