EIGHT hundred and fifty council workers are facing the axe today after details of a financial crisis were announced.
Town hall bosses in Oldham stunned staff last night when a shock email was sent out detailing their cost-cutting plans.
Officials from the controlling Liberal Democrat party say that the town's finances are in a mess.
In a bid to turn things round they have opened a 90-day consultation period and called in leading accountancy firm KPMG.
Leading figures from the council met trade union representatives to inform them that almost a fifth of the council's workforce of nearly 5,000 could lose their jobs.
Workers have slammed the council and unions have pledged to support their members.
They have begun a legal process setting out the reasons behind their actions and have opened negotiations.
Council leader Howard Sykes admitted the figure was 'significant' and would concern staff.
But he added that the potential cuts were part of 'a package of options'.
He said: "The key word is potential and that is precisely what it is at this early stage of the budget planning process. The fact is that the council has to find £17.3 million of savings to balance next year's budget. Staffing costs, like those of a lot of other councils up and down the country, are a big part of our overall budget, so it is inevitable that we should explore the potential for savings in this area.
"They are part of a package of options where we are also looking to reduce the amount of accommodation. We are also looking to find other major efficiency savings to bridge the gap. The proposed savings are critical in our efforts to provide our residents with the value for money services they quite rightly expect. They will enable us to go forward with the important regeneration and renewal work of our borough".
Finance boss Lynne Thompson added: "Everything possible will be done to minimise the need for compulsory redundancies. We will be looking at voluntary options, redeployment, retraining and other measures to ease this impact. "Our staff are being kept informed of the council's proposals, including the advice support they can access."
The move has already come under fire. One furious worker, who did not wish to be named, made reference to a recent £100,000 re-branding exercise taken on by the council.
"They spend £100,000 on coming up with a new symbol that looks like a Polo mint and then hit us with this," she said.
"It's absolutely diabolical. Some of these bosses should look at their own salaries before going for anyone else's."
Phil Woolas, Labour MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth said: "I find this staggering considering Oldham council is given one of the best settlements from central government of anywhere in the country. I would urge them to look at other options such as improving their energy efficiency before resorting to such drastic measures.
"Hopefully this can be avoided but if not it's one hell of a whack for Oldham."
Mr Woolas said he was due to meet Mr Sykes and would be raising his concerns.
Leader of the opposition Labour group Jim McMahon said: "I don't see how the Liberal Democrats think they can cut 850 jobs from the town's biggest employer without thinking it will impact on the local economy. I would urge them to think about their social and moral duty to the people of Oldham."
Frank Hont, regional secretary for Unison, also slammed the plans. He said: "It's not exactly the best timing. We'll be in there making sure that we do what we can."
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 15 and replies | View All
Jason G Robinson, Mottram St Andrew (18/09/2008 at 20:48)
gladys rowbotham, Manchester (18/09/2008 at 21:05)
He said: "I recognise the salaries are high and higher than my original recommendation, but can we afford not to recruit the best?
"There is a big job to do, but they are going to make an enormous difference."
Mike Chambers, currently chief executive of Hyndburn council, has been appointed deputy chief executive. He will earn around '100,000 a year.
John Bird, 56, will leave his post as assistant director for development and planning at Birmingham to fill a new position as executive director for regeneration.
Tom Flanagan is the new executive director of environmental services. He is currently assistant executive director of regeneration services with Liverpool council.
Veronica Jackson has been appointed to the new role of executive director for social services and health. She is currently assistant executive director of supported living at Liverpool city council.
Mr Bird, Mr Flanagan and Mrs Jackson are each expected to earn in about '80,000 a year.
gladys rowbotham, Manchester (18/09/2008 at 21:08)
Where is he now?
-Soothsayer+ (18/09/2008 at 22:13)
Here's some free advice: Collect unpaid council tax resolutely. I'm sick of paying inflated taxes to make up for lacklustre, lax, dithering, wimpish "decisions" from our "public servants".
thaitanium (19/09/2008 at 01:50)
If they are anything like Manchster council employees they will have had plenty of practice in sitting down, doing nothing and highly qualified in tea making.
Welcome to the real world.
dessie, manchester (19/09/2008 at 07:41)
not many i reckon and these are on the highest earnings, its always the workers who have to face the push!!!
Bean B4, manchester (19/09/2008 at 09:22)
Truth is that a lot of these council types running big budgets have no real experience in the real world.
Donna. Harpurhey (19/09/2008 at 10:32)
Ace Shakepseare, manchester (19/09/2008 at 12:15)
Tink, Manchester (19/09/2008 at 12:43)
Oh and some of us don't just sit on our ass all day! And we do have families to support and mortgages/bills to pay!
Jay B, oldham (19/09/2008 at 14:44)
Oldham council has to be one of the worst in greater manchester. having to live there and witness other towns in the area getting things right can be so depressing.
problem is oldham is a liberal run council and they're about as much use a chocolate teapot.
they'll waste thousands of pounds on cultural and diversity projects.
then spend nothing on other areas which are falling in ruin.
just look at the old town hall. thats not far off being demolished because they've neglected it.
they let us down with the con charge too. oldham has the metrolink coming already and will gain hardly nothing from it. yet the council supports it. why?
they answered that in the paper yesterday. because it frees up the section of land south of oldham where the railway was. which they can then sell off and line their pockets like they always seem to do.
maybe they will sell it for another new tesco in the area. we only have 3 with another 2 on the way.
Black Flag (19/09/2008 at 15:11)
So, the lib dems became the largest party in May and as they've been the largest party for four and a half months they are automatically the source of all the problems?
You are one of the best arguments against democracy I've ever encountered.
Jay B, oldham (19/09/2008 at 15:31)
im against dictatorships when its disguised as democracy like we currently have. thats all
Tink, Manchester (19/09/2008 at 16:38)
You tell em Jay!
Black Flag (19/09/2008 at 16:52)
Labour had control of Oldham council from 2003 until May this year.
Throughout the history of Oldham Council, Labour have held a majority for 26 years, compared to the Lib-Dems and Tories with 2 years each.
And your opinion is that the problems are down to the Lib-Dems?