New figures show there has been a fall in the number of flights through British airspace for the first time since the slump that followed the 9/11 terror attacks.
The number of passengers at Manchester Airport was down 112,852 in August compared with last year, a drop of 4.54 per cent, according to the figures from National Air Traffic Services.
And the number of take-offs and landings also fell by 2,178 last month compared to 2007, a drop of 10.15 per cent.
The stark figures emerged last night as British Airways boss Willie Walsh said the aviation industry was in the midst of its worst crisis since the age of mass air transport began more than 30 years ago.
He said: "Let no one be in any doubt. This industry is in crisis - a deeper, more protracted, more fundamental crisis than 9/11, the Gulf War or any of the previous shocks that have beset the industry since the age of mass air transport began in the 1970s."
News of the drop in flights and passenger numbers adds further gloom following the collapse of holiday firm XL Leisure, which left 85,000 holidaymakers stranded abroad.
The firm blamed `volatile' fuel prices and the economic downturn.
XL's collapse came hot on the heels of the failure of Zoom Airlines, which offered flights from Manchester to Canada, and the collapse of Macclesfield-based Seguro Holidays.
The drop in flights and passenger numbers appears to highlight concerns by BA boss Mr Walsh that the airline industry is being hit by a `devastating combination' of an economic downturn, declining consumer confidence and high oil prices.
Mr Walsh, in a speech to the London Chamber of Commerce, forecasted that more airlines would fail in the months ahead.
Crisis
He said: "The reasons for the crisis are now well known. Despite a recent and perhaps temporary fall, oil prices stand at extremely high levels and look likely to stay there.
"Meanwhile, the demand for travel has weakened because of the general economic downturn and a decline in consumer confidence. All in all, this is a devastating combination.
"Around the world, about 30 carriers have failed this year - and there will be more to come as we head towards the traditionally poorer returns of the winter travel season.
"The IATA, the airline trade association, has just forecast that losses for global aviation will reach £3b this year and £2.3b next year. So there is no doubt that the crisis is real."
The Manchester Airports Group, which operates Manchester, East Midlands, Bournemouth and Humberside airports, announced in July a 16.4 per cent rise in annual operating profits from £82.9m to £96.5m.
Passenger numbers across the group rose a modest two per cent from 28.6 million to 29.2 million, fuelled by strong performances at East Midlands and Bournemouth.
They fell by 200,000 at Manchester to 22 million.
And the new NATS figures also showed that flights across northern England, which are handled by air traffic controllers in Manchester, were 3,344 down in July on the previous year, a drop of 5.9 per cent. In August, they were down 4,474 on 2007, a drop of 7.9 per cent.
Chief executive Geoff Muirhead hailed an `excellent year' and said the group was in good shape to withstand turbulent times ahead.
He said yesterday: "We recognise that it is a tough market, but in the year so far the group is performing slightly ahead of our expectations and we are planning on this basis."
Aviation expert Chris Yates said: "A couple of carriers have gone from Manchester. Zoom collapsed in August and XL went to the wall last week.
"Travellers will vote with their feet. Given that we have a credit crunch, people are looking to holiday at home rather than go overseas. It will get worse before it gets better."
Ian Hall, director of operations at NATS said: "The aviation industry has always been a barometer of the wider economy, so it should not come as any surprise to see a slight slowdown, particularly since the airlines have signalled some cutbacks to services."
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
460
275
0
false
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Jonathan Curtis (17/09/2008 at 08:52)
Edina Clouds, GREAT Manchester (17/09/2008 at 10:06)
Passengers are treated badly as if we are all terrorists(there are way of doing this in a better manner)Air side is uncomfortable,crowded,and expensive.If there are alternative ways to travel I for one will take them.
In addition to this they have cut many routes and now unless you want to go to Europe there's very little on offer,every where else is usually through a London Hub.
Mark, South Manchester (17/09/2008 at 10:10)
Others might blame the poor service, dirty terminals, costly carparks and dreadful baggage delays at Manchester Airport - for the inevitable drift away of passengers.
(Some airports are still doing okay Mr Muirhead!!)
Donna. Harpurhey (17/09/2008 at 11:05)
MPs gravy train, UK (17/09/2008 at 11:20)
Maybe there is something wrong with dirty terminals, congestion, long queues, poor service, difficult and expensive parking, loss of many schedule carriers etc etc that just puts some people off? Just a thought.
Buzz, Moston (17/09/2008 at 11:23)
I believe the landing fees are the second dearest in Europe
They are just greedy.
The fact you now have to pay to pick somebody up from the airport is also outrageous.
They give the excuse it is for security reasons.
So, any terrorist will not bomb the airport because they have to pay to park!!!- MMmmm!!!!
Bean B4, manchester (17/09/2008 at 12:06)
Alos agree with poster about C charge.
Shut the place down I say.
It wasn't me, Merseyside (17/09/2008 at 12:22)
Edina Clouds, GREAT Manchester (17/09/2008 at 12:54)
Manchester City Council own the airport and the services we receive there are no better than the ones we receive from the council.
Bean B4, manchester (17/09/2008 at 13:07)
It wasn't me, Merseyside (17/09/2008 at 13:51)
Sam Anderson (17/09/2008 at 14:23)
C.O. Jones (17/09/2008 at 14:47)
You sound like the sort of traveller who makes most UK Airports an absolute chore..
And of course, it was all someone else's fault....etc etc..
Sam Anderson (17/09/2008 at 15:28)
Bean B4, manchester (17/09/2008 at 15:57)
Without being racist, they could easily cust the searches down by just picking on the ones who look like terrorists.
Why do we all ghave to suffer for the sake of political correctness and to avoid accusations of racism.
It's what most people think so why not say it ...
bet this doesn't get posted :-)
Trumpetman21 (17/09/2008 at 16:07)
Good riddance too!
Sick of this Government, MADchester (17/09/2008 at 16:23)
C.O. Jones (17/09/2008 at 16:37)
I am in the aviation industry. The point i am trying to make is if travellers switched on more, carried suitcases/baggage that was more suitable to a vacation (rather than emigrating with all their wordly goods), and generally tried to work with the extremely difficult guidelines that aiports are obliged by law to implement, it would make the whole experience less of an ordeal for everybody involved. At Ringway the other week, there was a travelling group of 25 "Thickos", who insisted on being checked in together for their 2 hour flight to Benidorm, despite the pleadings of the check in staff concerned with the strain it was going to put on the system to the detriment of all the people behind them in the line. And all because they wanted to be together on the plane.........for 2 hours........Passport allpications should include an IQ test..
I agree with you regarding the toilets....Ringway is a khazi and has been going that way for years. Two expensive in every department and largely patronised by complete morons...
C.O. Jones (17/09/2008 at 16:40)
Sam Anderson (17/09/2008 at 16:42)
C.O. Jones (17/09/2008 at 16:43)
S., Manchester (17/09/2008 at 16:46)
Bean B4 do you not think that if anyone in this world knew exactly what a terrorist looked like that we would all live in a much safer world! Oh and of course a high number of people would be out of a job and claiming off our government!!!
Sick of this Government, MADchester (17/09/2008 at 17:20)
S., Manchester (17/09/2008 at 17:39)
citycentre, manchester (17/09/2008 at 18:08)
so check which the queue is before joining it?
"my suitcase was over the limit", why not check this before joining the baggabe check in line? do it right first time and save you, and everyone else the delay
"staff would not give me my boarding card till I came back with a receipt proving I had paid the excess"
good for them, while i am sure you are honest they have no way to tell this
"remove your coat/belt and shoes "
there are signs well before the security point saying wha needs to be removed, if people did so in good time delays could easily be reduced.
i am generally asked to remove shoes at whichever airport i use, have started making sure i have good socks on!
so we have people in the wrong queues, trying to take on more luggage than allowed but not bothering to make the payment at the right time, having to queue twice, not reading the security instructions, slowing everyone down.
no wonder everything is so slow and the staff get grumpy
i am flying myself tomorrow, hopefully i wont be delayed too much by other passengers who cant follow instructions