THE new chief constable of Greater Manchester will be among 300 police officers joining in the party at the city's Pride festival this weekend.
Head of Cheshire police Peter Fahy, who will take over the top post with Greater Manchester's force later this year, will join the largest ever contingent of police officers to take part in a gay pride event when he helps celebrate the festival's 18th birthday on Saturday.
Officers and staff from 16 forces across the country will join the parade through Manchester city centre, leaving from the Museum of Science and Industry, in Castlefield, at 2pm.
GMP is one of the lead sponsors of this year's Pride celebrations.
The force's parade appearance has been organised by Police with Pride which consists of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender representatives from forces across the north west.
Sgt Julie Barnes-Frank, coordinator of GMP's Lesbian and Gay Staff Affiliation, said: "I am totally overwhelmed with the response we have had this year.
"It is fantastic that so many police officers and staff are taking part and it's a credit to them. Each year our presence gets bigger and bigger and this year it is true to say there's never been anything like it in the world."
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
L L Fontelroy (20/08/2008 at 14:38)
drew-peacock (20/08/2008 at 15:10)
Bean B4, manchester (20/08/2008 at 15:14)
the beer baron (20/08/2008 at 15:19)
Manchestaman, saddleworth (20/08/2008 at 15:51)
Once again (20/08/2008 at 15:57)
What lead sponsors and 300 officers to march, how do they justify this parade to celebrate someone sexuality, well sorry only one type of sexuality (I don't think there is a parade for being straight) when they say United cannot have a parade for actually acheiving something great. I just hate pollitical correctness. Their gay, so what, why do they always feel the need to let everyone know about it. Wouldn't mind as much if it wasn't at tax payers expense
Edna Of Hyde, Hyde (20/08/2008 at 16:06)
MPs gravy train, UK (20/08/2008 at 16:47)
I am neither gay or use the village but understand the real benefit that this area of Manchester brings to the city. Over the course of the year hundreds of thousands of gay people and their friends visit Manchester because if its village and reputation. They bring far more wealth and jobs to the bars, retaurants, shops and hotels than events such as the Labour Party conference that will cost us taxpayers millions to police.
Do we say "so what get over it" when Irish Catholics want to march through the city at taxpayers expense on St Patricks day? No of course not. Tolerance may just be acceptable in this day and age.
Felix, manchester uk (20/08/2008 at 17:30)
Helzibob (20/08/2008 at 17:55)
V P of Manchester, Manchester (20/08/2008 at 18:21)
It is great that so many officers and staff take part in the parade, which can I also point out is all in their own time, so at no point are us tax payers paying anything, and as said why do people moan on about this parade and yet do not mind the number of other parades that go on in this city.
Any costs by the council are recouped by the 30 million which is made from this weekend for many businesses in Manchester.
By the way well done to the new chief and all the senior staff who have supported colleagues from all backgrounds for many years.
Fran M (Permissum Populus Constituo) (20/08/2008 at 18:32)
What does grate is the constant lectures from on high and from the homosexual lobby about diversity, tolerance, equality and the rest. As for equality, I have been down to the so called 'gay village' many times and some of the behaviour I have seen would provoke arrest for public indecency if seen elsewhere in the city. Are the laws different in the gay village?
Gay pride? What does that mean? Proud of what? Seems to me that the homosexual 'community' wish to point up any differences there are and add to the idea of separateness. So you're homosexual! I don't care.
As a heterosexual, should I be proud of being such? That's what I am, so what? Should I get some mates together and have a parade and get GMP to use taxpayers money to sponsor it.
Perhaps we should have a parade for people with a foot fetish, or a rubber fetish, or whatever. We could set up a village for people with fetishes.
Sexuality should be a private matter and not something to be displayed as part of a public novelty.
J.Hall, Tameside (20/08/2008 at 18:53)
Whilst they protect the leather clad exhibitionists flaunting themselves vocally and bodily to promote their sick perversions,how many old folk will be getting a battering for their purses.
This society is the pits now,
and the public has been stopped from venting their opinions by legal restraints,and a threat of imprisonment.Somehow Hitler and Stalin left a legacy which is now copied regarding freedom of speech.
MrPaul, Manchester (20/08/2008 at 20:07)
And as for the blatent homophobic, degrading and downright insulting comments relating to this coming weekend, all i can say is it proves we still have something to march for!
Joe King, Manchester (20/08/2008 at 20:40)
V P of Manchester, Manchester (21/08/2008 at 00:41)
I am proud to be a born and bred Mancunian and very proud that my Police force are always at the top of poles for supporting people from minority groups, and promote working for GMP to all sections of our society and not just during Pride.
Instead of constantly moaning about the Police, why do we not try and make this city a better place and actually support them and help them.
So in conclusion until minorities stop being attacked and killed, then all these groups will need a voice and I am sure that GMP and the new chief will be there to bring law and order to our great city.
Mr Angry, Bury (21/08/2008 at 08:47)
If you are homosexual that is your own business, keep it to yourself.
If they are discreet about it I dont have a problem with it. I only object when it is flaunted in an "in your face" manner as appears to be the case with this.
Sexuality is a private thing, after all if you had a fetish, such as being tied up or whatever, you would'nt want to parade that in public, or would you?
Sorry, dont approve of this parade and think it should be stopped
Once again (21/08/2008 at 08:55)
Funny this because everybody was saying completely the opposite when Rangers came down. Everybody said the £25 million would just go into private buisnesses coffers and the council/taxpayer wouldn't see the money benefits. How is it now different?
Yes some people may have been beaten up for being gay, but people just like recently have been beaten up for not having a cigarette, but I don't plan to have a parade due to this.
TracyR, Manchester (21/08/2008 at 13:59)
I'm not gay, but I will be down there this weekend having fun and supporting the right of those who are gay to openly be who they are.
This is supposed to be fun with a serious underlying message, but considering the majority of comments here, I may well have slipped back im time to the late seventies...
Mike S, Manchester (21/08/2008 at 14:07)
Joe King - "normal heterosexual like God intended"
Comments like this and some others below in themselves justify the need for the Pride Weekend.
As for the MEN - I'm all for free speech, but interesting that you're being far more relaxed on the censorship front for this and most other gay-related stories.
It's self-funding (although admittedly a rip-off with little money going to charity, hence why I'm avoiding it this year) and the officers are all off duty. Further, the majority of us gays are far less of a burden on the tax payer than straight people. No kids to drain public resources, child benefit, family credits and the like. If we were all straight the welfare system would be bust!
Bean B4, manchester (21/08/2008 at 14:17)
PW, Manchester (21/08/2008 at 14:18)
But I don't like those who have a bee in their bonnet about it. Just like the parody (Only gay in the village) in Little Britain, which I think is a very clever observation by an actor who is also gay.
Mr Angry, Bury (21/08/2008 at 15:10)
Anyone who is less than 100% supportive of this parade is accused immediately of being homophobic and bigoted.
If you take the trouble to properly read and digest the posts you will see that none of us actually want to repeal the Sexual Offences Act of 1967 and recriminalise hoomosexuality, we are of broadly the same opinion, if you are gay, so what? keep it to yourself and dont flaunt it in front of everyone
What is wrong with that?
I have worked with a man who was gay in our office, he was OK, I got on well with him, he did'nt make a big issue out of it, that is the way to acceptance, not flaunting it in front of everyone.
as a previous poster said, why not have a parade for everyone with a fetish then if that is the case.
One final point, Tracy whatever, if you are arranging a trip back to the late 70s, count me in, 1976 and 77 were the two best and happiest years of my life, I was 16/17 then, before I became Angry....
Bean B4, manchester (21/08/2008 at 15:16)
Ha ha, Mr A you're a comic. In those days, like now, we had the tail end (politely put) of a labour government bereft of ideas.
You were happy because you were a kid.
Thank goodness along came the Blessed Margaret and solved all our problems.
So don't be Angrrrry - cheer up. David Cameron is just around the corner to make it all ok again.
Hoorah!
L L Fontelroy (21/08/2008 at 15:32)