JUST ten per cent of weekday motorists would pay a Greater Manchester congestion charge, a new study has claimed.
The figures have been published to reveal how the finances of the proposed scheme have been drawn up.
The controversial pay-as-you-drive scheme - on which the public of Greater Manchester will be polled in a referendum - involves two charging rings, where motorists would pay to cross.
One is just inside the M60 motorway and the other inner ring is around Manchester city centre.
Greater Manchester Future Transport has claimed its studies have shown that 80 per cent of peak-time drivers, who make up half Greater Manchester's daily traffic, would not pay a charge.
The figures show that just two per cent of peak-time drivers would pay the full charge of £5.
Five per cent of peak-time drivers would cross the two inbound charging rings, but not cross a ring heading out in the evening. Five per cent of peak-time drivers would either cross the M60 inbound only or cross the inner ring twice at peak times.
And eight per cent of peak-time drivers would cross one ring either the M60 heading out or the inner ring, either inbound or out bound
The body claimed that the average charge in 2013 will be less than £3.60.
Lord Peter Smith, leader of the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities, said he hoped that the study's findings would help dispel pricing rumours.
Unscrupulous critics
He said: "Unscrupulous critics have at various times suggested that congestion charging will be extended to the district towns and that a typical payment would be £8. I trust these figures will demonstrate how our plans have been put together assuming that the vast majority of drivers in Greater Manchester won't pay any charge at all and that, of those who do, the average charge will be less than £3 at current prices.
"There are obviously no plans to extend charging to the districts towns."
The study also claims that total revenues from the charging scheme in 2015 are estimated to be £174 million.
The government announced plans to introduce Britain's biggest congestion charge scheme in Manchester - in return for a wide range of public transport improvements worth up to £3bn.
It was confirmed last month that Greater Manchester will have a vote on the scheme in a referendum after a consultation period ends in October. Trafford, Bury and Stockport councils have already said they were opposed to the government deal. Manchester, Salford, Tameside, Wigan, Rochdale and Oldham support the plan and Bolton had pledged to hold a local referendum.
Tweet
C-charge: Only 10% will pay
August 11, 2008

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Simon B, No Taxation without Representation (11/08/2008 at 06:27)
Aka
MCC/AGMA/GMPTE/GMPTA CONgestion charge promoting organisation.
Gramsci (11/08/2008 at 08:23)
Trumpetman21 (11/08/2008 at 08:24)
No, empty words & hot air from the pro-toll trolls.
PW, Manchester (11/08/2008 at 08:27)
They are trying to make it look attractive - as if people like me can afford to pay their present claim of £3.60 a day! Prepare for all kinds of tactics. Vote No!
gulliblenotme, bury (11/08/2008 at 09:29)
Miliions have been spent on traffic restrictions to reduce the road space available causing congestion.
Don't be CONNED we will ALL pay,we are being told anything thay can think of to achieve the desired result and the amount of motorists paying appears to be falling all the time.I, FOR ONE, DON'T BELIEVE A WORD OF IT.When it comes to the referendum vote NO TO CONGESTION CHARGING
shayla (11/08/2008 at 09:31)
£2080 a year PAYCUT - NO THANKS - Paul Teeque (11/08/2008 at 09:32)
Just like there was obviously no plans to introduce a CON-Charge at all a couple of years ago by Leese.
PULL THE OTHER ONE SPINMASTERS! I don't believe ANY of this article. Its complete rubbish.
£2080 a year PAYCUT - NO THANKS - Paul Teeque (11/08/2008 at 09:34)
I think Graeme from cleanairnow has forgot his login and resigned up again LOL!
Mike S, Manchester (11/08/2008 at 09:36)
And if only 10% will pay the charge, would we ever manage to repay the loan?
Pentest 2, Hyde (11/08/2008 at 09:46)
I just noticed an advert on the back or a 'Privately owned bus this morning' Re: con charging, saying "would we like greener buses" on the route it was travelling.
Of course we would, but not at the expense of the local tax paying voters.
These are privately owned bus companies, and as such sould be purchasing new stock at their own expense.
A big 'NO' to any proposed 'CON' charge.
Fran M (Permissum Populus Constituo) (11/08/2008 at 09:48)
However, given the mendacity of the pro CON tax cabal at the head of this project it is difficult to give this assertion any credibility.
Stockport Dad (Tory public transport leader: oxymoron), Heaton Mersey (11/08/2008 at 09:49)
Finally - looking at these initial postings [Gramsci excepted] - the level of sheer hystreria is, well, hysterical. Have you guys ever thought what people must think of you the way that you rant & rave?
best wishes, the Daddy
pinpoint, withington (11/08/2008 at 10:00)
The people that are targeted are the same people that already have to endure increased rent costs, gangland violence and an army of car parking attendants. Not everyone in the city is rich. Now the council wants to charge me everytime i might actually want to go to and from home.
If this goes through i will have to make every attempt to move out of the city and work somewhere else. I cant afford to pay these charges. I work hard to make ends meet and this would finish me off.
Andy2, Manchester (11/08/2008 at 10:02)
£2080 a year PAYCUT - NO THANKS - Paul Teeque (11/08/2008 at 10:06)
Or are they going to be fed the "silver spoon" and given a 4x4 fully paid for by yourself to drive the roads of the rich and upperclass?
DISGUSTING have a word with yourself.
£2080 a year PAYCUT - NO THANKS - Paul Teeque (11/08/2008 at 10:08)
Spread the word to family, friends and work colleages NO TO CON CHARGE STEALTH TAX WAGE CUT.
Ronnie Silver (11/08/2008 at 10:10)
Alan Kelly (11/08/2008 at 10:20)
If the expectation that only 10% of all vehicles will pay the charge and they need this 10% to congest the roads in order to pay back the loan, where will the real reduction in traffic come from?
David Macaulay (11/08/2008 at 10:40)
Polky (11/08/2008 at 10:42)
"How many drivers will be affected?"
"50!", "40!", "30!", "20!", "10!"... I'm thinking of the stoning sketch from the Life of Brian... Either that or we're at some sort of reverse auction. :-)
It'll be 5% come November, you watch.
Don't believe a word of it... we'll all be paying this back for very little gain.
Frostee, Oldham (11/08/2008 at 10:44)
Perhaps if it's only 10% it's not worth the bother and cost of setting it up and maintaining the massive administration.
Sir Reginald Ringpull, A-u-L, Lancashire (11/08/2008 at 10:54)
"Only 10% will pay"
Those totally "scrutable pro-chargers" state that only 10% will pay, they also say that revenue will be £174,000,000 a year and the typical cost is £3(at todays prices (Lord Peter Smith figure)).
So! £174 million means that £3.3 million a week comes in to the coffers. 1.1 million vehicles aweek or just over 200,000 a day. If that is 10% of the daily traffic - where are the other 1.8 million cars, vans and trucks?
Graeme, Manchester (11/08/2008 at 11:03)
£2080 a year PAYCUT - NO THANKS - Paul Teeque (11/08/2008 at 11:03)
Monkeyboy i require answers!
Grief Tourist (11/08/2008 at 11:21)