TWO former police officers have joined forces with celebrity lawyer Nick Freeman - nicknamed Mr Loophole - to try to help drivers escape convictions.
Mr Freeman, the scourge of traffic police, has recruited husband-and-wife team Dawn and Chris Sweetman to bolster his Manchester law firm.
They left Greater Manchester Police to forge careers as lawyers before joining Freeman and Co.
Mr Freeman, 51, from Mere, Knutsford, has successfully represented a roll call of famous names in motoring cases, including Manchester United boss Sir Alex Ferguson and footballer David Beckham. The £10,000-a-day solicitor was nicknamed Mr Loophole for helping drivers escape conviction.
Delighted
Mr Freeman said: "I'm delighted to have recruited this dynamic team. I'm confident they will prove a real asset and help us maintain our position as one of the country's most successful law firms."
Chris Sweetman trained as a solicitor with a Rochdale firm before joining GMP as a Pc in 1993, meeting Dawn two years later. He left in 1997 and joined Burton Copeland solicitors, going on to be called the Bar in 2004.
He has been involved in a number of high-profile cases, including the Full Sutton prison riots in 1999, the Sharon Beshenivsky murder case and the case of Sally Clarke, the Cheshire solicitor wrongly convicted of murdering her two babies.
Dawn Sweetman joined GMP in 1991 and left in 1997 to work in civil law, switching to criminal law the following year.
She qualified as a solicitor in 2005, heading the Crown Court department of Rochdale-based Healy Connor Mulcahy. For the past two years, she was with a large city practice.
Mr Freeman, who has trademarked his `Mr Loophole' nickname, has represented famous clients including the TV presenter Jeremy Clarkson and EastEnders' actor Steve McFadden and sporting figures including golfer Colin Montgomerie, footballer Wayne Rooney and snooker player Ronnie O'Sullivan.
Tweet
Former cops join Mr Loophole
August 11, 2008
Nick Freeman with Chris and Dawn Sweetman

Showing comments 1 to 13 and replies | View All
Eveningstar, Withington Manchester (11/08/2008 at 10:48)
Sir Reginald Ringpull, A-u-L, Lancashire (11/08/2008 at 11:18)
Eveningstar wrote:
"It is about time the so called loop holes were closed once and for all."
They are not loop-holes. The people that get off have not been charged correctly. If you were charged with doing 100MPH on the M60 last Saturday and they summon you for 100MPH on Sunday - thats not a loop-hole, it's bad "workmanship" by the authorities.
The Seeker, Eccles (11/08/2008 at 11:21)
JayTilzey, m29 (11/08/2008 at 12:33)
If a summons is issued saying Sunday instead of Saturday, then we should be able to start again and say "OK, it was a mistake. It has nothing to do with the facts of the case, so let's just issue a new summons."
Good luck to people who make a career, and a lot of money, from helping drunk drivers keep their licences, but I prefer being able to look at myself in the mirror.
Once again (11/08/2008 at 14:40)
Graham, City Centre (11/08/2008 at 14:52)
I think that the police should pay for a few days of Nick Freeman's time to teach them what they're doing wrong. What Nick Freeman does is perfectly legal, making the most of the procedural mistakes that police officers seem to routinely make.
Donna. Harpurhey (11/08/2008 at 15:11)
Ace Shakepseare, manchester (11/08/2008 at 16:17)
Careless Whisper (11/08/2008 at 17:18)
Tezza, Tyldesley (12/08/2008 at 07:09)
“The fact remains that people who have committed serious offences are not facing justice because of trivial matters.
Well as Nick Freeman always says they have not been found guilty so they legally they have not committed any offence.
If it was not for the incompetence of the police then they would not be able to get away with it.
So if someone in your family was charged with murder but the arresting officer got some vital piece of evidence wrong you feel that it is ok to “say well that’s wrong so let’s just change it” I don’t think so
But my main concern with this case would be “” how does that bloke get such a good looking wife when he’s no oil painting””
Pandora (12/08/2008 at 14:01)
A - A good start.
JTC Formerley JimC (12/08/2008 at 16:00)
Three. One to climb the ladder, one to shake the ladder and one to sue the ladder company.
S P In exile, Tameside (12/08/2008 at 17:14)