Council leaders will be asked tomorrow to use special powers to put `restrictive' ratings on films which could encourage youngsters to smoke. That could mean films rated PG in the rest of the country given a 15 or 18 certificate in Greater Manchester cinemas.
The long-term aim is to introduce a nationwide ban on anyone under 18 seeing a film - in the cinema, on video, or on TV - in which people smoke.
The region's 10 councils are also set to cut all funding to theatres that put on plays involving smoking, even though such performances are protected by law.
The proposals, branded `the worst kind of nannyism' by pro-smoking campaigners, are part of a new manifesto drawn up by the Greater Manchester Health Commission.
It will be discussed by the 10 council leaders at a meeting of the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities (AGMA).
The leaders will be asked to immediately sign up to three key proposals - cutting all council funding to theatres and sports grounds that allow smoking, using planning legislation to force stores to move cigarettes away from check-outs, and slapping higher certificates on films that show smoking.
Councils have the power to act as local censors and alter the official certification of a film by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC). Famously, a number of local authorities refused to show The Exorcist and Last Tango in Paris in the 1970s - despite both films being passed by the BBFC. More recently, in 2002, several councils allowed children under 12 to see Spider-Man despite its official rating of 12.
A report by the GMHC says the councils should for the first time `take into account smoking when giving a classification to film'.
"For example, if a local authority becomes aware that the tobacco industry has placed smoking in a film by paying for an actor/actress to smoke and that this looks as though the use of the role model could encourage children to smoke, then it would be reasonable to issue a more restrictive classification," it adds.
AGMA leaders will also be asked to 'strongly endorse' a submission to government arguing for:
*No smoking in cars with children present
*No smoking by drivers
*No smoking at outside tables in restaurants
*All films with smoking to be rated 18
*No smoking on TV
Challenging
GMHC bosses have described the manifesto is `challenging and audacious'.
But Neil Rafferty, spokesman for pro-smoking lobby group Forest, said: "This is really dangerous stuff.
"It is a deliberate attempt by anti-smoking extremists to control and limit freedom of speech. It is nannyism of the worst kind.
"There are much more shocking elements and potentially damaging things being shown in films."
Mr Rafferty also attacked plans to cut all funding to theatres that allow actors to smoke on stage. Currently, that is permitted everywhere in Britain except Scotland, provided `the artistic integrity of a performance makes it appropriate for a person to smoke'. That exemption was put in to protect plays where smoking is seen as an integral part of the drama.
Mr Rafferty said: "You will be hard-pushed to find any rational person who is seriously worried about the danger of passive smoking from someone standing on a stage some distance away."
Cliff Morris, leader of Bolton council, will introduce the paper at tomorrow's meeting.
He said: "The fact is that 60 per cent of smokers want to give up and it is our duty to help them. Smoking is the biggest determinant of ill health in Greater Manchester.
"If we can reduce smoking by just one per cent we can potentially save 200 lives a year."
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
460
275
0
false
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Voter (24/07/2008 at 07:01)
Simon B, No Taxation without Representation (24/07/2008 at 07:11)
I think its a disgusting habit.
But local censorship of a film where someone smokes, do not be silly.
This is the thin end of a very thin wedge.
Let them get away with this and they will move onto other stuff next.
MC Spanner (24/07/2008 at 07:11)
I await the day when we are sent a booklet on how to use a toilet and brush our teeth. It can't be long now.
Lawrence Glendinning (24/07/2008 at 07:32)
polkyb (24/07/2008 at 07:34)
AND It's not THAT far to travel to get outside Greater Manchester.
Jay B, oldham (24/07/2008 at 08:32)
Mr Angry, Bury (24/07/2008 at 08:40)
Tubby Scruff (24/07/2008 at 08:49)
All I can say to Cliff, is pick your lamppost, for the revolution is coming, the P.C. fightback is beginning.
EricH, Horwich (24/07/2008 at 09:06)
Absolute madness, (and I've never smoked in my life).
Anthony, Accrington,Lancashire (24/07/2008 at 09:11)
Councillor Allheart, in a black cab (24/07/2008 at 09:12)
I hope they are also going to censor films that show people eating salty fatty food and drinking alcohol or sugary drinks.
WhiteWolf01, Northumberland (24/07/2008 at 09:13)
So much for the loony left, but come on with this we are really drifting into the ridiculous.
What I really fail to understand though is why we continue to vote for these fanatics, smoking is still legal, although it is becoming more and more like you should wear a long mac ensuring your cigarettes are wrapped up in a brown bag when you buy them.
Despite the fact I don't like smoking though I will say this for all you who do!
......Pack up your troubles in your old kit bag and smile smile smile,
"While There's a lucifer to light your fag smile boys that's the style...
What's the use of worrying....
After all when all you have to do is kick this load of tripe out at the next election.
dessie, manchester (24/07/2008 at 09:18)
i think its gone well OTT now im a non smoker but enough's enough!!
Nu-Labour = Nu-Shambles, MADchester (24/07/2008 at 09:19)
Ps I don't smoke
alvinlwh (24/07/2008 at 09:51)
Uncle Buck, Burnage (24/07/2008 at 09:52)
I used to watch Cmdr Shaw smoke in Stingray. Didn't make me want to light up!
Come-On-City. Manchester, now Paris, France. (24/07/2008 at 09:56)
Films with sexual activity usually get an 18 certificate. I dont know why you single out homosexual activity as bad. Do you think hetrosexual activity carries no risk?
Come-On-City. Manchester, now Paris, France. (24/07/2008 at 09:56)
Goofy's Dietician (24/07/2008 at 10:17)
Nelly's Patch, Cheadle Hulme (24/07/2008 at 10:53)
JimC Crumpsall (24/07/2008 at 11:14)
Is this what our taxes pay for. Big wigs to sit and come up with the most obnoxious ideas to berate our lives.
I think this one will go up in smoke.
Pippa, Manchester (24/07/2008 at 12:21)
jomov, Manchester (24/07/2008 at 12:39)
WILL THESE PEOPLE STOP WASTING OUR MONEY ON THESE HAIR BRAIN PROJECTS PLEASE?
Princess_Pam, Crumpsall (24/07/2008 at 13:10)
They should stop their nannying of us, and again allow smoking commercials and advertisements and let people make their own minds up.
NoBanJan, Manchester (24/07/2008 at 13:12)