ALL cabs will be exempt from Greater Manchester's planned congestion charge, it emerged today.
Controversial proposals drawn up by the region's transport chiefs would have seen pre-booked private-hire vehicles paying the peak-hour charge of up to £10 a day, while `flag down' black taxis did not.
Now they have had a change of heart - and decided private-hire taxis should be exempt, too. The u-turn was hailed by cabbies last night as `a victory for common sense'.
It emerged as the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities (AGMA), a coalition of the region's 10 councils, began 14 weeks of public consultation to decide whether to introduce the peak-hour congestion charge of up to £10 a day in return for £2.7bn of public transport improvements.
Brochures detailing the proposals have been sent out to all 1.2m homes in Greater Manchester.
AGMA are due to take a decision in October - although Sir Richard Leese, leader of Manchester council, is spearheading a move to give the people the final say in a binding region-wide referendum.
Eligible
A consultation document released by AGMA yesterday confirmed private-hire drivers would now be included in a list of those eligible for a 100 per cent discount should the charge to be introduced. Black cabs, emergency vehicles, motorcyclists and disabled drivers were already on the list.
The document said: "While there are legal differences between hackney carriages [black cabs] and private-hire vehicles, the consensus is that the latter also perform a valuable public service.
"It is therefore proposed that [a] 100 per cent discount should be provided for licensed hackney carriages and private hire vehicles that are registered with a Greater Manchester authority."
Paul Meek, of the Manchester Private Hire Owners and Drivers Association, said: "This is a victory for common sense.
"The U-turn has come about because it's finally been realised that we are an essential part of the public transport system."
Private-hire drivers had warned they would be forced to pass on the costs of the congestion charge - up to £10 a day - to their customers.
They had also threatened to take legal action against AGMA for what they claimed was discrimination.
Grant
The £2.7bn on offer to Greater Manchester in return for the charge is made up of £1.5bn in government grant and £1.2bn of loan.
It emerged last night that the loan would be paid back over 20 years from 2021 at an estimated rate of £56m a year.
The charge is expected to generate £174m a year and cost £31m to run.
Increased ticket sales on the expanded public transport network are predicted to be worth £69m a year - but that will be swallowed up by the £74m a year that will need to be reinvested to keep the system in good order.
And other schemes linked to the TIF bid - including better park-and-ride, upgrading interchanges, Oystercard-style tickets and real-time passenger information - are likely to cost a further £48m year.
The consultation documents say cash is only expected to become available for further public transport improvements `towards the end of the package lifespan'.
AGMA chiefs say the charge-for-cash deal is the only way of raising such a significant sum for Greater Manchester's trams, trains and buses.
They have calculated they would have to raise the average council tax bill by £215 a year, for 25 years, to achieve the same effect.
Lord Peter Smith, leader of AGMA, said: "We have looked at all the available options and the bottom line is that [this] is the only source of funding capable of delivering a world class transport system to Greater Manchester."
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Simon B, No Taxation without Representation (08/07/2008 at 06:43)
good news for cabbies
However, wont this leave a hole in their estimates for the CONcharge cash collected for paying off the debt.
rammylad, ramsbottom (08/07/2008 at 07:49)
Also if MCC now accept the charge will hit cabbies they also now know for a fact that it will hit all businesses. Yet they continue down this route. That is true incompetence.
dessie, manchester (08/07/2008 at 07:51)
THAT IS IF ITS IMPLEMENTED, THEY WAY THE MEN ARE GOING ON ITS ALREADY DONE AND DUSTED!!
WHAT ABOUT THIS REFERENDUM MANCHESTER FOLK SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON WHETHER WE WANT IT OR NOT!!!!
A. Coates, manchester (08/07/2008 at 07:55)
Goldengrrrl, Leeds (08/07/2008 at 08:04)
Had enough (08/07/2008 at 08:14)
BOBTILTD, URMSTON (08/07/2008 at 08:21)
£56m per year X 20 years = £1,120,000,000.
Is that a £80,000,000 shortfall (without interest) or have I missed something ?
Is the loan interest free now ?
Ministry of Truth Spokesman (formerly MC Spanner) (08/07/2008 at 08:45)
Spearheading - Sir Richard is the champion of the referendum. I always knew he would come good!!!!
By the way if Private Hire vehicles are exempt, should ordinary vehicles not be? They cause the same amount of congestion. Maybe boroughs like Bury should allow all drivers to be licensed as Private Hire and therefore those of us that live in Bury can be exempt.
It's only the same as in London where thousands of vehicles are registered as Private ambulances
Jay B, oldham (08/07/2008 at 08:58)
"hailed by cabbies last night as `a victory for common sense"
Wrong!
The victory for common sense will be when this stupid idea if finially scrapped!
Aunty Glo, Great Manchester (08/07/2008 at 08:59)
Can I turn my car into a taxi?
Audenshaw Bob (08/07/2008 at 09:01)
Ron Silver (08/07/2008 at 09:01)
Bigfish (08/07/2008 at 09:09)
Bobby, City Centre (08/07/2008 at 09:11)
(DAVE GODDARD FOR LEADER OF MANC) paul teeque (08/07/2008 at 09:28)
WOAH WOAH WOAH hold on nelly, why should ANYTHING have to go up? we should be given this money at no cost to the public like London has been with the £Billions for network rail, stadium, airport, dome etc etc
Sir Reg Ringpull, A-u-L, Lancashire. (08/07/2008 at 09:30)
"It emerged last night that the loan would be paid back over 20 years from 2021 at an estimated rate of £56m a year.
So 20 times £56 million equalls £1.12 billion. So is it is an interest free loan? No! better than that - £80 million discount and we dont start to pay back the money till after 8 years of charges.
A £1.2 billion loan at 5% interest has repayments of £96 million a year for 20 years
poc (08/07/2008 at 09:39)
Bigfish (08/07/2008 at 10:00)
D.F.Macaulay, Romiley (08/07/2008 at 10:24)
You can bet the poor private motorist who might still find it impossible to use the "improved" public transport system effectively when and where he wants will be bottom of the list.
(DAVE GODDARD FOR LEADER OF MANC) paul teeque (08/07/2008 at 10:25)
" So there you go this con-charge is aimed at the people who have no choice but to use their car just to go to work, in other words it is a money making scam, let the fight begin.......
Had enough"
Very valid point raised there.
Seems the government would rather I take a cab to work than my car. MORE congestion caused by the cab driving to mine, then driving to next fair after dropping me off. MORE pollution. MORE cost.
Kiwi-blue, Christchurch NZ (08/07/2008 at 10:26)
There are some people linking myself and Laura Norder with the Town Hall. Sorry but you are literally miles out!
ace, manchester (08/07/2008 at 10:36)
Manchester Dale, Manchester (08/07/2008 at 10:41)
Another wrong decision that will again encourage the tax payers to vote No. The bureaucrats prove yet again why they can't be trusted to deliver anything sensibly
Big Bad Bob, Worsley., Walkden (08/07/2008 at 10:58)
If you are actually in NZ then you are miles out!
Must be very boring watching sheep if you have to continually post comments on here on something that does not concern you.
Big Bad Bob, Worsley., Walkden (08/07/2008 at 11:00)
Not the Town Hall, how about the MEN.