CHANCELLOR Alistair Darling has backed Manchester's pay-as-you-drive plan - but predicted it is unlikely to be extended nationally in the near future.
He told the M.E.N that Manchester, as a `vibrant city', was leading the way in improving public transport and tackling congestion.
But Mr Darling, who as transport secretary promised a national road pricing scheme within five years, now admits that idea is on the back burner.
Mr Darling's home city of Edinburgh has already rejected congestion charging in a referendum, and the Manchester plan is also controversial.
Trafford Council's Tory leader Susan Williams said congestion charges would be `political suicide' for Labour, but Sir Howard Bernstein, chief executive of Manchester Council, promised the scheme would `deliver economic growth'.
And Mr Darling says the £3bn allocated to public transport improvements in Greater Manchester, along with the congestion charge, will make a huge difference to the city in the long term.
Vibrant
He told the M.E.N: "I was struck by the huge amount of construction when I visited Manchester a few weeks ago, not just at Salford Docks where the new media facility is being built, but also the housing in east Manchester. You have a vibrant city.
"I know the authorities are looking to a congestion charge scheme but they have to decide on the best way of providing it, with a public transport system which is not undermined by people who continue to drive into the city."
Three years ago Mr Darling was pushing for a national road charging system using new satellite technology. At the time he said: "Future generations will curse us if we fail to deal with the problem."
He says he still supports moving to a system of charging by distance and based on how congested a road is, but admits it's a long way off.
He said: "Every country will wish to consider a national congestion scheme to solve a growing problem but, because the technology is not there, never mind the infrastructure, it is nowhere near being introduced.
"It's some time away. It's an ideal but it's in the long term."
Only last week the Commons Transport Committee said there was little appetite for pay-as-you-drive, saying adding that Manchester would not be a pilot for a national scheme.
The Chancellor said that the Greater Manchester plan was similar to that in London, with motorists paying to cross boundaries, and insists it is different to road pricing.
What do you think? Have your say.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Karney for head of GMPTA(formerly MC Spanner) (24/06/2008 at 06:53)
Support from a man who has u-turned on CGT,10%,Fuel Tax all in the space of a year.
The worst chancellor in History even admits his own National scheme is unworkable but he doesn't mind taxing the people of Greater Manchester a little bit more.
Roll on 2010
Timberman, MANCHESTER (24/06/2008 at 07:01)
Once again we see it, an MP who says one thing then a couple of years down the line changes his mind, and we are supposed to believe that this shower can plan for the future, no chance.
They are all strangers to the truth, I would like to put Darling and a few more of those Labour 'people' on the 'BACK BURNER'.
Pete (24/06/2008 at 07:30)
shayla (24/06/2008 at 07:32)
How much more damage will be done before we can vote you out.
How much worse can it get?
Audenshaw Bob (24/06/2008 at 07:38)
And yes Mr Darling we do have a vibrant city so why try and kill off this vibrancy by introducing this tax? Business are looking and will move out of the city centre. An office worker working 9 - 5 can't afford £1200 per annum just to get to work.
dessie, manchester (24/06/2008 at 08:30)
Chris, Irlam (24/06/2008 at 08:35)
What next from the MEN?
"Leese says paying c-charge will increase your life expectancy by 10 years and reduces body fat by 5%!"
"Brown says Labour doing a good job on the economy!"
Yawn.
Pentest (24/06/2008 at 08:51)
Its about time he was out on his heels with the rest of the NuLabour parasites.
Pentest (24/06/2008 at 08:58)
PW, Manchester (24/06/2008 at 09:13)
Manchester residents and businesses are now ready to fight this tax.
Mike S, Manchester (24/06/2008 at 09:26)
I note that Edinburgh got a referendum - and rejected it!
I also like how in touch Darling is with the North West "...Salford Docks where the new media facility is being built..." Don't you mean Salford Quays and Media City?! Hasn't got a clue.
Sean Corker MART, Manchester (24/06/2008 at 09:55)
After the last few days of releases it is becoming clearer that they will say just about anything to rail road this through.
Melandra (24/06/2008 at 10:01)
Laura Norder, Didsbury (24/06/2008 at 10:33)
It's a (small) group of disaffected tories, fib-dems and insignificant also-rans, like the UKIP, that are using the opportunity to vent their spleen against the government - own up.
Get some proper policies (and leaders, for that matter) - not based on a single-issue argument - and fight a future election... but that wouldn't suit, would it? Much easier to snipe when not in power, eh?
The two (?) main opposition parties - should the electorate ever go mad and vote either/any of them into control - would not reverse this current council's congestion solution, so why pretend a change of government would make any difference?
The C-charge is the only practical answer to Manchester's growing overcrowded and congested roads. And you know it.
Mark,Radcliffe. (24/06/2008 at 10:54)
tram vet (24/06/2008 at 10:58)
Cuckoo!!
we deserve better (24/06/2008 at 11:13)
I wouldn’t be surprised if 99% of us would be in favour of all the intended improvements and the benefits they would bring if it wasn’t for this CON charge.
Just a thought but were we ever given an explanation as to why the Government wouldn’t provide the full £3billion or whatever is, to fund all these transport improvements? Nationally, how much were they prepared to commit to a central fund, surely they were expecting more than just two cities to bid? So where has the rest of the central fund gone? Once it became obvious there weren’t going to be any more takers, why wasn’t a revised bid made for more money?
It looks as though Cambridge, the only other city to make a bid may now go off the idea, so will that mean there’s more funding available? If they no longer need it, why can’t we utilise these funds so we ‘don’t need’ a CON charge?
MANCHESTER, THE ONLY CITY IN THE COUNTRY TO APPLY FOR FUNDING AND WE STILL HAVE TO PUT UP HALF THE MONEY!!
You cannot get a stronger bargaining position. There’s a chance we might just follow Cambridge. If the Government want it so much, instead of allowing them to just dump this 30 year financial burden on Greater Manchester, RE-NEGOTIATE, it could save us £1.5 billion and 30 years of misery.
The intent is to successfully combat congestion. In order to do so, does it matter whether it’s funded completely by central government to which we have already made countless and ever increasing contributions to already, or from your wages for the next thirty years?
I know which I prefer!
Jay B, oldham (24/06/2008 at 11:19)
again is this another one who you cant trust?
they will tell you what you want to hear so they can get you on their side. but it'll all change when they get it passed.
irlgeo (24/06/2008 at 11:30)
Sean Corker MART, Manchester (24/06/2008 at 11:30)
Mark
Darling and the Gov will actualy make a massive profit (around £2 billion+ )once the loan is paid off
Aunty Glo, Great Manchester (24/06/2008 at 11:41)
Jay B, oldham (24/06/2008 at 11:49)
has anyone actually thought. if we pay the congestion charge but dont see a massive difference in the amount of congestion. can we claim our money back? seeing as it isn't doing its job.
or is there a human right law out there that states if the roads are already paid for by the public in road duty and fuel. then they cannot impose another charge as its a public highway and we have the human right to go where ever we want?
Sir Reg Ringpull, A-u-L, Lancashire. (24/06/2008 at 11:55)
Taken from Mortgages for Business:
Congestion charge ''to benefit city living'' - buy to let mortgages
Published: 23.6.2008
The proposals to establish a congestion charging system in return for major public transport investment in Manchester will benefit those living in the heart of the city, it has been suggested.
Stuart Law, chief executive of property portal Assetz, has explained in a blog reproduced on propertyinvesting.net that those living in the centre of the city and commuting to satellite centres such as Stockport - as half of his office''s staff do - will not be charged under the plans, making this lifestyle cost-effective.
So the vibrant City Slickers commutes to downtown Stockport for nowt - whilst Stockports finest cop a three quid tax on the reciprocal route.
Pushkin (24/06/2008 at 11:58)
Nelly's Patch, Cheadle Hulme (24/06/2008 at 12:08)