Campaigners from Friend's of the Earth are fighting a ban on taking bikes on to the Metrolink.
They want the next generation of trams, being built as part of the massive investment in the region's transport system, to feature cycle storage bays.
The Love Your Bike campaign coincided with the news Metrolink's `Little Bang' - the extension to Rochdale, Droylsden, Chorlton and Oldham - should be complete by spring 2011 after engineers M Pact Thales were appointed to create and maintain the new line.
But cyclists say the new trams will be a wasted opportunity unless cycles are allowed on board.
Campaigners want Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive and Greater Manchester councils to do a U-turn on the ban.
David Coleman, of Manchester Friends of the Earth, said: "We want to show that it is possible to get a bike on a tram by taking on cardboard life-size cut outs of cycles.
"It's illogical that prams, push chairs and wheelchairs are allowed onboard when bikes aren't - unless they are folded up."
Robbie Gillet, a Friends of the Earth campaigner said: "We need trams to accommodate as many cycles as possible, otherwise people will tend to use cars."
GMPTE's Metrolink director Philip Purdy said: "We are currently reviewing the policy that people can't take bikes on the trams by asking the public for their opinions and by investigating the impact allowing bikes on trams would have on all our passengers.
"We will put forward a recommendation to Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority once this review is complete."
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
460
275
0
false
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Audenshaw Bob (19/06/2008 at 07:05)
At Peak Times there is hardly room for humans never mind bikes. If you've got a bike, ride it.
I used to work with someone who claimed to have cycled in to town every day from Hazel Grove and was always telling us tales of what happened on the A6 and how he was also saving the planet. What he actually did was get on a train at Hazel Grove, get off at Piccadilly and then cycle to Balloon Street. He was soon found out and never lived it down.
Too many cyclists are self serving bio anarchists that think they have a right to trains, roads and trams.
dessie, manchester (19/06/2008 at 08:45)
Vicky M (19/06/2008 at 08:56)
Pete (19/06/2008 at 09:03)
only nickname left (19/06/2008 at 09:10)
The Didsbury One (19/06/2008 at 09:13)
a level head (19/06/2008 at 09:14)
I say tag an extra carriage on the rear, strip out the seats and use it for cyclists. Failing that - ban hoodies and people who ticket dodge and there will be plenty of room..
chris (19/06/2008 at 09:26)
JimC (19/06/2008 at 09:44)
Anthony, Accrington,Lancashire (19/06/2008 at 09:48)
Funky Tuna (19/06/2008 at 10:00)
I enjoy riding my bike too. However, I do feel those on public transport should not be restricted because I want to drag my bike on there!
In Holland, there are huge bike parks at every station and major tram stop. They have included personal cycles as part of an integrated transport plan.
Saying that, if we had bike parks, the bikes would only get 'robbed' in Manchester I suppose!
Jay B, oldham (19/06/2008 at 10:00)
if this is the case then oldhams metrolink expansion is flawed before it begins. at the moment you can take a bike on the train but if these get replaced by trams then you wont be able to.
so all this metrolink expansion hits cyclists who are at least doing something for the ease in congestion before anyone else.
joaquin wonov, manchester (19/06/2008 at 10:14)
sine
only nickname left (19/06/2008 at 10:21)
Pete (19/06/2008 at 10:21)
Black Flag (19/06/2008 at 10:38)
That’s a spurious argument. Trains manage the situation perfectly well by carrying bikes subject to space being available. I don’t see any reason why Metrolink couldn’t carry bikes under the same conditions.
jomov, Manchester (19/06/2008 at 10:43)
Abit like the Euro car parks?
I don't think it's fair to all the other Metrolink users that bikes are crammed on the carriages with them....maybe a separate compartment is possible, or a section of one...
City Of Crime [AKA Scrotnig], Gorton (19/06/2008 at 10:53)
I didn't realise they were banned no matter what. What nonsense.
Seriously, I had no idea about this. I have never such a load of rubbish in all my life. Who thinks these rules up?
a level head (19/06/2008 at 11:48)
Anyway the anti cyclist metrolink entity (ACME)argument is flat. Do you also want to ban the part car/part tram commuters as they must be another nuisance to the 'you must walk to/on/and from the tram' brigade. Pure green you are and beggar anyone who has a wheelchair, pushchair, guide dog etc. They all just get in the way.
Community spirit and a service that represent the 'need' of the commuters.
Pete (19/06/2008 at 11:50)
only nickname left (19/06/2008 at 11:52)
BF - What happens when you turn up with your bike to get on the met and their is no space, you will then have the choice of leaving your bike, waiting for the next one (no garentee there will be space on that one either), or then have to ride your journey either way be very late. Lets just keep them off the met.
jomov, Manchester (19/06/2008 at 12:13)
It is probably therefore more appropriate to have the option of storing your cycle at the tram stop, similar system to park and ride. Especially at peak times.
Pete (19/06/2008 at 12:16)
1) Part car part tram users do not expect to take their mode of transport onto the the tram with them.
2) Wheelchair, Guide Dogs and pushchair users are a separate case and are those most likely to be disadvantaged if cycles are allowed onto trams.
Who takes their bike on the bus? Why is the tram any different?
Black Flag (19/06/2008 at 12:29)
Pete, you want to know how it would be policed; exactly the same way it is on the trains. If there is room for a bike when you get on, then you are on. If there are routes where the rush hour causes trains to be filled to capacity, then the carriage of bikes (and prams for that matter) can be restricted between those hours.
There is no logical reason that somebody should be prevented from getting on a near empty tram with a bike on a Sunday morning, but that's what the rules say.
Your argument is spurious Pete and also very petty.
a level head (19/06/2008 at 12:29)
If you asked me to get off because the tram was full I'd say.."Oh Pete - Nooooo! My right to travel on this tram with my bike has been provided by GMPTE policy makers. That policy makes no mention of having to alight said vehicle if Pete asks me to. Therefore, I would rebuff your request and ring my bell whilst diasapprovingly frowning at your petulent, cheeky mug.