MOTORISTS have been driven off Greater Manchester roads by soaring fuel prices.
Figures reveal there has been a marked decline in traffic levels in recent days - although today bad weather brought gridlock back to some roads.
Despite today's queues, experts say the high cost of fuel could have a long term effect on congestion and the way we travel in the region.
The reduction in the number of vehicles was clear on Deansgate last night where the M.E.N. pictured the almost deserted scene at what would normally have been rush-hour.
M.E.N. photographers also went to a notorious stretch of the M60 at the Irwell Valley near Swinton, where cars are normally nose-to-tail, and found traffic flowing freely as commuters headed home last night.
Traffic analysts confirmed there has been a dramatic fall in the number of cars on the region's roads as the price of unleaded petrol heads towards £1.20 a litre.
Mary Vingoe, of Altrincham-based traffic information service keepmoving.co.uk, said: "In the Manchester area traffic started to get quieter a couple of weeks ago when the schools went on their half-term break, but traffic levels do not appear to have increased again."
Data by the company shows the average speed of traffic on the M60 at the Trafford Centre has increased by around 5mph compared with the same period in May. This suggests that there is less traffic on the roads.
Prof Garel Rhys, of Cardiff University, said: "There's been a slight reduction in traffic but that reduction has had a dramatic effect on the flow of traffic. It's probably down to the very rapid rise in the cost of petrol.
"A number of people will actually give up the car and use public transport."
He suggested bosses behind Manchester's congestion charge plan should wait before implementing it to ensure fuel prices came down.
He said: "The price of fuel has actually reduced the amount of congestion for you."
Richard Critchley, of Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce, said: "There's growing evidence that people are cutting down on non-essential trips.
"We're going to see more and more evidence of people looking at alternative forms of transport like walking or cycling."
A Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive spokesman said it was too early to say whether rising fuel prices has resulted in an increase in the use of public transport such as the Metrolink. But commuters at Altrincham tram station reported a huge rise in the number of people trying to catch the Metrolink into the city yesterday. Graham Smith, data manager for Trafficmaster, said there has been a gradual decline in levels of traffic in the region over the last year.
"It is actually down every month for the last 12 months, compared with the same month the year before, by between one and five per cent." Matthew Woodhouse, of Harry Hall's Cycles in Manchester, said: "There are definitely more pedal cycles on the roads. There are two more big cycle shops in Manchester where we used to be the only one."
An RAC spokesman said: "I've spoken to one of our patrolmen in Greater Manchester and he said traffic is noticeably lighter, especially in the last few days. He's also noticed that people are driving slower than usual."
What do you think? Have your say.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet


Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Simon B, The North West. (18/06/2008 at 06:53)
Does anyone else get the feeling the guy in the video was going to say more?
Karney for head of GMPTA(formerly MC Spanner) (18/06/2008 at 06:57)
Who is going to support a congestion charge when there isn't any?
Rugbygirl, Urmston (18/06/2008 at 07:31)
DAVID, CHEETWOOD (18/06/2008 at 07:32)
Sean Corker MART, Manchester (18/06/2008 at 08:05)
If high oil prices are here to stay, as claimed by the pro tolls then we do not need a congestion charge.
dessie, manchester (18/06/2008 at 08:31)
WE WANT A REFERENDUM!!!
shayla (18/06/2008 at 08:33)
No one can afford to drive as it is, don't be trying to squeeze more money out of people and stop hiding behind enviromental issues.
You are just grabbing tax to make up for bad management of our money.
Mike (18/06/2008 at 08:38)
Black Flag (18/06/2008 at 08:41)
Manchester Dale, Manchester (18/06/2008 at 08:53)
If the economy and feel good factor picked up we would probably pay £1.40 a litre. But if some people are switching to public transport, what a great time to incentivise them to stay there with special tickets etc. Oh joined up thinking from our PTE - don't be daft.
smittyh, Blackley, Manchester (18/06/2008 at 08:57)
Trudy, Bolton (18/06/2008 at 09:03)
Chris, Irlam (18/06/2008 at 09:05)
If high oil prices are here to stay, as claimed by the pro tolls then we do not need a congestion charge."
I'll second that, this is terrible news for the pro-toll trolls.
Any comments boys?
On another note, another MEN poll where 80% are against the Toll Tax....when will the trolls accept the truth?
muj7860, manchester (18/06/2008 at 09:08)
Rick D'alaglio (18/06/2008 at 09:08)
PW, Manchester (18/06/2008 at 09:14)
But as this charge is the start of their national scheme, I don't think anything will shake their determination to bring it in. So the public have to employ their determination to make sure they don't. Don't listen to some actor with a script on the telly! All he knows is he'll be getting a nice cheque.
citycentre, manchester (18/06/2008 at 09:17)
Deansgate was solid traffic from the station at least as far as the new RBS buildings at 7:15 last night
Bigfish (18/06/2008 at 09:18)
The Congestion Charge can work!
Come-On-City. Manchester, formerly of Brooklyn. (18/06/2008 at 09:28)
Seems like a highly selective picture by the MEN.
Prpbably taken when a green light for pedestrians was on. Look at the top left, is that cars I see waiting at a red light?
Or just seems like a lull in traffic, rather than as a direct result of fuel prices.
chris (18/06/2008 at 09:28)
All those that regularly moan about cyclist....laugh it up suckers, you'll be joining me soon enough. you never know, you may enjoy it and loose some weight. trouble is the only people left on the roads will be wagons and those "look'at'me" types that are the most dangerous. the next few years are going to be interesting.
Black Flag (18/06/2008 at 09:29)
That would be a good point, but from the fact that higher fuel prices leave the government worse off, not awash with extra tax.
Ronky, Bowker Vale (18/06/2008 at 09:37)
I guess they'll just have to increase the charge, expand the zone and expand the hours it applies, or will they be doing that anyway?
Chris, Irlam (18/06/2008 at 09:44)
Remember back 10 years ago - congestion wasn't even on the agenda, it was all pollution so the government were happy to use that as a stick to beat road users with.
However, with cars getting cleaner all the time & zero-emission cars not far away the government have to prepare for a time when fuel duty will no longer bring them the billions of pounds of revenue they rely on.
What they have chosen is a pay-per-mile road charge but they deperately need to generate a 'new' problem they can use as a reason to bring in these eventual replacements for fuel duty - so congestion was recently labelled as the new bogeyman of modern Britain.
This has resulted in various attempts to throttle the free-flow of traffic as this free-flow is public enemy number one of those who are behind this new taxation - so we see a proliferation of bus lanes, speed humps, lower speed limits & other measures all aimed at slowing traffic down.
So when we are all buzzing about in our electrically-powered cars in 2020 pumping precisely zero pollution into the atmosphere and are STILL paying through the nose for the privilege we will know who to blame - those helping to force this Toll Tax through right now.
Make sure you have your say - write to your MP, your councillors & the local papers demanding a referendum. Don't put up with the sham consultation AGMA & the rest will offer.
Grief Tourist, Tameside (18/06/2008 at 09:51)
Jay B, oldham (18/06/2008 at 09:58)