Tom Maguire, director of congestion mitigation in America's biggest city, was speaking during a visit to Manchester yesterday.
His comments followed an announcement by transport secretary Ruth Kelly that Manchester's tram, bus and rail network would receive £3bn of improvements - provided a peak-hour congestion charge of up to £5 a day was introduced.
Mr Maguire, who played a key role in shaping similar plans in New York, said the combination of investment and the charge could be the key to its success.
"This plan is a real opportunity for Manchester to be a leader in transport planning," he told the MEN. "I do not want to be too quick to pass judgment on cities which I don't know too well, but I think this plan could work here.
"What makes it special is the fact it is a comprehensive package, with all aspects of public transport considered."
Mr Maguire was in Manchester to speak at the tmap - traffic management and parking - conference 2008, and exchange ideas with transport experts from Greater Manchester.
The region is about to start 12 weeks of consultation on the proposals from government before deciding whether to accept the charge-plus-investment package.
Mr Maguire has faced his own battles in New York, where plans for a congestion charge were recently vetoed. The scheme was approved by New York City leaders, but overturned at state level.
"There are eight million people living in New York, but only five per cent of them drive into the city," said Mr Maguire. "I believe it was those drivers who were listened to by the state over and above anyone else."
Mr Maguire said a congestion charge for New York was not yet dead in the water, and said he would continue to push for state approval.
Traffic
"All the problems of congestion are still there," he said. "Traffic keeps getting worse, and that will happen in other cities including Manchester."
Mr Maguire later spoke to around 350 transport and parking experts, who gathered at the Bridgewater Hall to discuss and share transport practices.
Key themes were changing people's attitudes to car usage, improving bus route coverage and making use of existing road networks with schemes such as car sharing lanes.
Mr Maguire's message focused not just on congestion charging, but on improving and properly linking a variety of transport options such as cycle networks, bus services and on-site parking.
Sir Howard Bernstein, chief executive of Manchester council , opened proceedings with a clear meassage that Manchester's economy could only grow with the introduction of a pay-to-drive policy.
He said: "As our economy grows and grows, we need a step change.
"Monday's announcement means we can now promote a serious debate - it has significance for the country as a whole and even internationally. We are being radical, but I know we are doing the right thing."
What do you think? Have your say.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
460
275
0
false
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
BOBTILTD, URMSTON (12/06/2008 at 07:51)
£175 for Public sector delegates
£945 for private sector delegates
Delegates will be drawn from the following industries:
Central Government
Congestion Charging Operations
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
Department for Transport
Development Agencies
Engineering Sector
Executive Agencies Highways Agency
Integrated Transport Sector
Local Authorities
Motorway and Toll Operations
Non-Departmental Public Bodies
Parking Sector - Private and Public
Road Pricing Sector Road Sector - Private and Public
Technology Providers
Traffic Authorities
Transport and Engineering Consultancies
Transport Authorities
Transport Groups
With the following job functions:
Chief Executives
Congestion and Toll Charging Directors
Director of Traffic Management
Director of Highways
Environmental Managers
Finance Directors Head of Parking/Parking Managers
Head of Planning
Infrastructure Managers
ITS Directors
Policy Directors
Road Pricing Directors Traffic Commissioners
Traffic Directors
Traffic Managers
Transport Directors / Managers
Transport Planners
Was there anyone present representing the views of ordinary motorists or the general public as a whole ?
Looks like a talking shop on how they can get this tax in place.
shayla (12/06/2008 at 08:08)
I would like to know if British tax payers funded this gentleman's trip?
felix, Liverpool (12/06/2008 at 08:15)
People who have no understanding of the local and regional economy shouldn't be interfering in the debate, or important issues won't be dealt with. Cities like Manchester are not like cities like London/New York and the issues are not comparable, going far beyond simply how long it takes to drive into the city centre.
The entire region depends on Manchester, and many people travel into Manchester from surrounding cities (that currently won't be getting any improvements). It's important that we're able to sort this out practically, not just listen to fluffy speeches about why we should tackle congestion. We do know that, actually!
PW, Manchester (12/06/2008 at 08:38)
The people that matter or keep them in their jobs weren't represented.
Laura Norder, Didsbury (12/06/2008 at 09:30)
You should be living in hamlets (with 'kissing cousins') in Cloud-Cuckoo Land; far away from the real world of congestion and pollution; where the summers last forever and no one pays anyone for anything, but...
Wake up - this is the real world!
Everything comes at a price and, if you moaners that don't want Manchester to take its rightful place as a vibrant, go-ahead city, not constricted by gridlock and stationery traffic, please leave - we don't need you.
(Not missing you already.)
polkyb (12/06/2008 at 10:02)
You get fed false and misleading information by an organisation with no power (AGMA) backed by a government in financial crisis and you take it all in... Congestion, grid lock, stationary traffic, must do something before the world ends... Whereas the actual facts are that Greater Manchester has very little congestion, is FAR from being gridlocked, has stationary traffic at all traffic lights and on the motorways when there are accidents, etc.
Gullible or what?
PS. Doing nothing IS an option, especially as fuel prices are currently on the up again. Birmingham did nothing and got a handout, as did Edinburgh.
Chris, Irlam (12/06/2008 at 10:18)
Again, have you any FACTS to back up this assertion or are your arguments & opinions as lightweight as the other pro-toll trolls musings are?
I think we all know the answer to that don't we?
PW, Manchester (12/06/2008 at 10:19)
Big Bad Bob, Worsley., Walkden (12/06/2008 at 10:22)
you come out with the same drivel time and again, change the record please!
Nelly's Patch, Cheadle Hulme (12/06/2008 at 10:43)
Big Bad Bob, Worsley., Walkden (12/06/2008 at 10:44)
Dave (12/06/2008 at 10:53)
It will be these very people who will benefit most from the public transport benefits brought in by the Charge.
polkyb (12/06/2008 at 10:59)
I wonder what will happen then?
Simon B, The North West. (12/06/2008 at 11:18)
"Good point Dave. As fuel increases in price, car usage will naturally drop to a point where there aren't enough cars left on the roads of Manchester to be able to cover the repayment on the mortgage.
I wonder what will happen then?"
Increase the times charged and the amount.
And cover whats short after that by puting it on Council Tax.
Laura Norder, Didsbury (12/06/2008 at 11:32)
That is rich coming from the ranks of the 'same old; same old' anti-s.
The C-charge is coming - and will remain, even in the unlikely event of the Tories scraping into power saometime in the future - rejoice! (Now, where have I heard that before?)
Laura Norder, Didsbury (12/06/2008 at 11:35)
"It will be these very people who will benefit most from the public transport benefits brought in by the Charge." - Dave
That will obviously be the fault of this naughty Manchester City Council, working in cahoots with OPEC.
Shame on them.
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (12/06/2008 at 11:38)
So did Manchester. We got £600m last month for Metrolink 3a. That's nothing to do with the next £3bn though.
I B Happy, Seven Dwarfs Mansion (12/06/2008 at 11:42)
The "improvements" in public transport my well not help those in peril of falling off the roads due to increased fuel costs.
Consider the cost and time implications of a family with a couple of kids. Parents to work - kids to school - weekly shoping, then what about outings & entertainment, trips to the seaside, Alton Towers, Hospital, Doctors appointments, visiting gran, taking the dog to the vets etc. A single person would probably have no probs - but multiply the cost of public transport or taxi fares by 3 or four and the cost of a car maybe still worth it. An additional benefit is not having to sit next to me on the bus!
polkyb (12/06/2008 at 11:46)
£3bn... You mean £1.5bn (only three times more) to spend on PT and £1.3bn to set up the congestion charge, totaling £2.8bn?
felix, Liverpool (12/06/2008 at 11:54)
I think these issues, and ideas how to solve them, are more valuable in being discussed than posting after posting from people whose motivations may not be entirely apparent to the casual reader. One way or another - C-Charge or not - the north-west has a challenge ahead of it and if we don't deal with it ourselves, no-one else will.
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (12/06/2008 at 12:07)
Have you just made that up? I don't think they've ever announced the cost of the charging scheme. Evidence please!
polkyb (12/06/2008 at 12:13)
I'm fed up of doing your homework for you.
Big Bad Bob, Worsley., Walkden (12/06/2008 at 12:15)
Laura if you were a turkey you would vote for christmas!
BOBTILTD, URMSTON (12/06/2008 at 12:17)
Well said
I oppose the charge ( I make no apologies for that), but I as your post suggests, the issue should be debated openly and fairly with possible other alternative proposals explored.
But the ordinary citizens of Manchester should be allowed a full voice in the matter and ultimately given a referendum and not have this single option of a congestion charge or nothing forced upon them.
Simon B, The North West. (12/06/2008 at 12:23)
What if this was not about a Congestion charge, but say a massive road improvement scheme.
Say turn the M602, A57 Regent Road, Mancunian way, A635 Ashton old road into just one full size motorway through Manchester to give massive improvements road capacity.
What would be the opinion of the pro congestion charge people on here?