THE GOVERNMENT has given the green light to Greater Manchester's £3bn plan to revolutionise public transport - but only if a controversial congestion charge scheme is introduced.
Transport secretary Ruth Kelly is expected to announce on Monday that her department WILL fund a package of proposals that includes a massive extension of the tram network and huge investment in trains and buses.
In return, Greater Manchester would introduce a peak-hour charging system of up to £5 a day at current prices, based on inner and outer `rings' around the city centre.
The news brings to an end a year-long wait to hear if the government would provide the cash.
It will also spark a bitter political row between Greater Manchester's 10 councils, who will decide whether to accept the deal in a crunch vote before the end of the year.
Split
Businesses and the public also appear to be split down the middle on what is believed to be the biggest economic decision the region has ever faced.
The 10 councils will carry out a three-month public consultation before a crunch vote on whether to press forward.
Current voting rules mean at least seven of the 10 local authorities will have to say 'yes' for the charge - and investment - to go ahead.
Three councils - Trafford, Bury and Stockport - have already withdrawn their support, while Bolton has promised to hold a local referendum.
Greater Manchester's charging scheme would consist of an outer ring around the M60 and an inner ring nearer the city centre.
Vehicles would carry special tags that would register when a ring was crossed. Charges would apply towards the city centre during 7am-9.30am, and out of the city centre between 4pm and 6.30pm.
Scope
The overall charging zone would be 12 times bigger than London's when it was first set up.
The £3bn bid requested £1.2bn from the government's transport innovation fund (TIF), plus permission to borrow £1.8bn more.
That will be paid back over 30 years from the proceeds of the charge.
Sources in the Department for Transport (DfT) have made it clear TIF money would only be made available to areas prepared to bring in congestion-charging schemes.
Ten places expressed an interest - but only Greater Manchester and Cambridgeshire have submitted formal bids.
Greater Manchester intends to use the cash to complete the Metrolink "Big Bang", with lines running to the airport, Oldham and Rochdale town centres, and the Trafford Centre.
Infrastructure
There would also be major investment in buses and trains, as well as hundreds of new park-and-ride spaces and electronic tickets that can be used on all forms of public transport.
Transport chiefs have pledged the majority of the improvements would be in place before the charge was introduced - probably at the end of 2012.
Supporters of the bid claim growing congestion could put at risk 30,000 of the 210,000 new jobs due to be created in the region by 2021.
They say TIF is the only substantial cash available to British towns and cities for major investment in public transport.
Opponents say the charge will drive businesses out of Greater Manchester and into the hands of rivals like Liverpool, Leeds and Birmingham.
An exclusive MEN poll found 64 per cent of people were opposed to the idea of a congestion charge. But 59 per cent said it was `a price worth paying' for improvements to trams, trains and buses. Thirty nine per cent said a charge WOULD change the way they travelled.
A DfT spokesman declined to comment last night on when and if an announcement on the bid would be made.
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet
City gets the Green Light
June 07, 2008
GO AHEAD: Manchester to get the green light for £3bn of public transport improvements - but only if it introduces congestion charging

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Kurt Stephens, Sale (07/06/2008 at 07:51)
Very interesting times ahead.
Kurt Stephens, Sale (07/06/2008 at 08:01)
PW, Manchester (07/06/2008 at 08:27)
markyboy (07/06/2008 at 08:43)
after brown got a kicking at the local elections in his words he said' we need to listen more to the people of the country', well from where i am sitting this fool isnt listening and has NO intentions of listening.
for the record mr stephens i can assure you if trafford had changed to labour control at the local elections, they would have continued with the same stance as the tories, so now you know trafford will NOT change its decision cos they have listened to the public, unlike your beloved leader bottler brown.
jomov, Manchester (07/06/2008 at 09:11)
To a government who listens and understands its people!
David /2 (07/06/2008 at 09:20)
Also I notice there is NO money for cycle lanes where this region is years behind other cities.
Mark Spencer, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire. (07/06/2008 at 09:33)
"Greater Manchester's charging scheme would consist of an outer ring around the M60"
May I respectfully suggest that one gets a map of the area and then does check the inner M60 ring - It is a non starter - you cannot have someone going from Rochdale to Stockport via Oldham & Ashton or Wigan to Rochdale via Bolton free because they are outside the M60 - whilst Oldham to Manchester is £5 (at yesterdays prices).
The loan will never be paid off by a a few thousand who are forced travel into the centre in the rush hour - without extending the zone or the hours of charging.
A Bus Driver (07/06/2008 at 09:49)
Manchester Dale, Manchester (07/06/2008 at 09:50)
rammylad, ramsbottom (07/06/2008 at 09:52)
I have said it before, there will not be a Con Charge in Manchester regardless of Monday's decision. People power is more powerful than any party, we killed the poll tax with mass riots and we will kill the Con Charge.
Swiftly forgotten 'til next year (07/06/2008 at 09:53)
Laura Norder, Didsbury (07/06/2008 at 09:56)
I'm disappointed that Didsbury doesn't look like it will be getting the Metrolink - yet; but I'm optimistic that a solution can be found in the not too disatant future.
In the meantime, it looks like I'll have to stick with the car.
ace, manchester (07/06/2008 at 10:23)
Mark,Radcliffe. (07/06/2008 at 10:36)
Come-On-City. Manchester, formerly of Brooklyn. (07/06/2008 at 11:00)
Fran M, Stockport (07/06/2008 at 11:14)
Tonya786, Saddleworth (07/06/2008 at 11:18)
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (07/06/2008 at 11:18)
Mark Spencer: "May I respectfully suggest that one gets a map of the area and then does check the inner M60 ring - It is a non starter - you cannot have someone going from Rochdale to Stockport via Oldham & Ashton or Wigan to Rochdale via Bolton free because they are outside the M60 - whilst Oldham to Manchester is £5 (at yesterdays prices).May I respectfully suggest that one gets a map of the area and then does check the inner M60 ring - It is a non starter - you cannot have someone going from Rochdale to Stockport via Oldham & Ashton or Wigan to Rochdale via Bolton free because they are outside the M60 - whilst Oldham to Manchester is £5 (at yesterdays prices)."
I don't understand your point? Why should a journey from Rochdale to Stockport be charged? Such a route takes you along the M60 - a road designed for high volumes of traffic and such journeys. It's the trips into Manchester that travel on the too congested radial routes that would benefit most from a little less traffic. Plus the trip from Oldham to Manchester could easily be done on the tram.
Laura Norder: "I'm disappointed that Didsbury doesn't look like it will be getting the Metrolink - yet; but I'm optimistic that a solution can be found in the not too disatant future."
I'm pretty sure the Didsbury Metrolink line was advertised as part of the £3bn package...
Pentest (07/06/2008 at 11:33)
Sean Corker MART, Manchester (07/06/2008 at 12:06)
The Pro Toll side have spent the last year denying that an extension to the outer towns was part of the plans. Now these plans that never officially existed have been 'cancelled'. If the Manchester Charge is put in place it will be virtually impossible to stop any expansion, just look at London.
Grief Tourist, Tameside (07/06/2008 at 12:09)
-Soothsayer+ (07/06/2008 at 12:12)
Does this mean if you cross both rings you pay £10 a day?
They're living in their cocoon in Westminster being chauffeured around everywhere that they forgot about the terrible British weather, funny how this comes out in the summer.
They've also forgot that millions of people are tied to finance deals on their cars and have no choice but to drive, if we're taxed of the road then we're going to be stuck with cars no one wants and we'll lose money.
What's going to happen to millions of useless cars?
It won't happen, because ditching your car isn't an option.
Chris, Irlam (07/06/2008 at 12:33)
Liverpool, Warrington, Leeds et al will be p*ssing themselves quite frankly at our willingness to handicap ourselves in this way.
Is there a chance this will be quashed at the consultation stage some may ask? Not a chance, it will be a sham consultation exactly as the last one was.
Put it to the TRUE test of public & business support - Referendum now!
Mark Spencer, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire. (07/06/2008 at 12:47)
Where you an I differ (IMHO) is that you think that moneys raised are for Traffic Improvement - and to cut down on congestion - where I know that it is a way of trying to get more money off me to fund Private Business, whilst making us the Pattsies to see if it works or not.
Wigan is about 16 miles from the M60 - Why the **** would they want a Congestion Charge. Bolton is about 6 miles away from the M60. The major congestion is on routes in and out of the centre of the City of Manchester - thats why the charges only apply if you are going in the Am and leaving in the PM (subject to the proposal being completely different to what the "leaks" have been.
So if they cop the motorist at the M60 ring road very few will pay the TAX.
Most of the outlying districts will not be affected - so why do 9 other council want something which should not effect them greatly? Even you will have to leg it to Droylsden to get the Metro till Ashton gets it - but hold on! (Most of) Ashton is not in the M60 zone - why should they have the Metro while not paying the TAX.
If Ruth Kelly gets up to deliver her resignation speach next week - we will know. But I reckon my vision of the future sees the charge not stopping at the M60 and only about a billion spent on transport improvements the rest on the setting up and running the scheme, with the Metro costing about three hundred percent more than it should.
ace, manchester (07/06/2008 at 12:54)
Trafford centre,manchesters ring road. were all put in place pre to the anouncement of the charge,so it was designed that way to con us all...politicians are scum.