About 500 bikers caused three lanes of the M62 and M60 to be closed to allow their convoy to crawl along at 15mph.
A series of police road blocks set up on slip roads along the route prevented commuters from getting onto the motorways until the convoy had passed.
Today police said some of the 20 trucks also involved in the protest had broken an agreement to stick to an agreed speed and could face possible prosecution.
But the bikers stuck to the deal and travelled from Birch Services to Salford Quays without incident.
Stewart Sager, organiser of the bikers' convoy said: "The turnout was very impressive. Everyone on it I spoke to said it was safe, legal, and ran smoothly.
"The M6 is a target for the campaign, and given time we would like to organise something else.
"We have had a very positive reaction from the public and this was organised in just three days. The government must reduce tax on all fuel and bring the cost of living down for the general public."
Frank O'Grady, a biker from Liverpool who joined the protest, said: "It was a peaceful demonstration and we just wanted to get the message across to the government that feelings are strong and not just us but truckers and taxi drivers too.
"I think demonstrations like this will grow and grow and spread to other cities - there is talk of a rally in London."
Surprise
Another biker said: "Converging on London from all over the country is the answer to make the government really sit up. The police in Manchester were helpful but had everything under control - there needs to be an element of surprise."
Greater Manchester Police said yesterday's protest, which had started at 8.30am and lasted about an hour, did cause some disruption, but it was minimized thanks to planning by the Highways Agency, Salford council, and GMP.
In a statement GMP said: "Unfortunately the small number of HGV drivers caused some added disruption after failing to comply with the agreement.
"Despite being briefed by police of what was expected of them, and what was agreed with organisers, a number of HGV drivers broke off from the group of demonstrators and drove at an unacceptably slow speed.
"They were stopped on the M602, given warnings and dispersed. GMP has gathered evidence and will consider any appropriate action in consultation with the relevant authorities.
Assistant Chief Constable Ian Hopkins said: "We worked with our partner agencies to make as many motorists, businesses and residents aware of this planned demonstration as possible.
"The vast majority of those taking part have expressed their views in a way that was agreed with police, that was safe for motorists and that caused minimum disruption.
"We are disappointed that a small number of other demonstrators let them down and acted in an unacceptable way, causing added disruption to some drivers."
Meanwhile the Road Haulage Association is pressing ahead with plans for a mass lobby of Parliament early in July.
This will be timed to coincide with the SNP amendment to the current Finance Bill seeking the introduction of a Fuel Duty Regulator designed to stabilise fuel prices.
RHA chief executive Roger King, said: "To have an impact we need to get directly involved with a parliamentary process that will confront government face to face so that they have to answer publicly as to what they propose to do. Fortunately this amendment promises to do just that".
The Fuel Duty Regulator would result in an automatic freeze on fuel duty increase if world oil prices rose above levels forecast by the Chancellor and a parallel reduction in fuel duty to match the extra revenue from VAT from higher pump prices.
What do you think? Have your say.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
460
275
0
false
Tweet





Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
only nickname left (06/06/2008 at 08:48)
Audenshaw Bob (06/06/2008 at 08:55)
All yesterday did was bring in more tax revenue to Gordon Brown due to all of the fuel used. I calculate the protest costed £50,000 in fuel.
Alan Kelly (06/06/2008 at 09:12)
Furthermore it looks like it was the police holding them up with a rolling road block.
(Dad's should know better!) paul teeque (06/06/2008 at 09:55)
The police fining HGV's for going too slow is DISGUSTING. We really are living in a police state when they tell us how to run our protests and threaten legal action if we don't abide, its a protest we make the rules!
Next time I would like to see roads gridlocked for HOURS, disruption, no violence from the police when they don't get their own way and most of all a sense of an angry mob which gordy brown will then HAVE to take notice of.
If everyone rioted in london tomorrow over current fuel prices something would be done, but were too soft as a nation and let the dictators tell us how it is. The french wouldn't stand for this!
JOB WELL DONE ANYHOW BIKERS LONDON NEXT!!!
(Dad's should know better!) paul teeque (06/06/2008 at 09:57)
I feel until the public do create a real "backlash" and "disruption" is caused on a large scale we won't be taken seriously.
Grief Tourist, Tameside (06/06/2008 at 10:05)
Voter (06/06/2008 at 10:11)
Pentest (06/06/2008 at 11:09)
Mick (06/06/2008 at 11:15)
Karney for head of GMPTA(formerly MC Spanner) (06/06/2008 at 11:24)
Paul Teeque - Something would be done. Police Batons Tear Gas broken bones?
What do you think they are going to do?
If they drop fuel duty by 20p and VAT by 2.5% to try and compensate for world prices, it's only going to be taxed somewhere else.
You've had your day in the news - maybe go back to living in the real world like the rest of us.
Rob (06/06/2008 at 11:30)
All yesterday did was bring in more tax revenue to Gordon Brown due to all of the fuel used. I calculate the protest costed £50,000 in fuel."
It was probably a 20 mile running that would have cost each biker max £3. £3 x 500 bikers = £1500.
Not sure where your figure of £50k comes from!
alvinlwh (06/06/2008 at 11:33)
jomov, Manchester (06/06/2008 at 11:36)
Iain Monks (06/06/2008 at 11:44)
The increase in VAT collected due to fuel price increases is a windfall for the government, if all they did was reduce the duty by a similar amount to stabalise fuel prices there would be no need to increase tax in other areas and everyone would benefit from the reduction in transport costs.
Leo B (06/06/2008 at 11:45)
Karney for head of GMPTA(formerly MC Spanner) (06/06/2008 at 11:47)
The OECD has slashed its growth forecast for the UK
The economy faces one of the sharpest slowdowns in the world, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) found.
In an unusually explicit rebuke, the report blamed the Government – and by implication Gordon Brown – for borrowing and spending too much in recent years.
This “excessively loose fiscal policy” left little, if any, room to cut taxes and save the economy from a deep decline, it stated.
Some 200,000 more people will lose their jobs over the next 18 months as unemployment rises to 5.8 per cent — the highest level in a decade;
The economic growth rate will slump to 1.4 per cent next year, the lowest since 1992, and far below the Treasury’s 2.5 per cent forecast.
To combat the decline, the OECD said the Bank of England needed to cut interest rates three times, bringing them down to 4.25 per cent — the lowest in more than four years.
However, it advised the Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), which takes its latest interest rate decision today, to wait until next year before a reduction, or risk losing control of inflation.
The OECD has warned repeatedly that by spending and borrowing so freely since the turn of the millennium the Government would leave Britain ill-equipped to deal with an economic slump. It said yesterday that this had come to pass.
Forecasting that unless the Government raises taxes or cuts spending it will break its borrowing rule, it said: “Much tighter fiscal policy [higher taxes or lower public spending] will be required in the future if the rule is still to be respected.
“While ongoing economic weakness in 2009 would argue against fiscal restraint, the Government’s options have been limited by excessively loose fiscal policy in past years when economic growth was strong.”
Whereas the United States has produced significant tax cuts to help home owners through economic troubles, the OECD said Mr Brown had little or nothing left to offer."
In other news a bunch of hairy bikers solved Britains economic problems but demanding a tax cut. Clearly they are not au fait with the OECD's opinion of tax cuts.
-Soothsayer+ (06/06/2008 at 11:50)
I notice because the protest wasn't conducted in London it wasn't high in priority on the news.
We want our HARD EARNED tax money spent on TAX PAYERS!!!
We should be paying less tax by clamping down hard on those that don't pay tax i.e tax evaders, criminals, drug dealers, bootleggers etc etc etc
Britain is a sea of crime.
I heard there are 3.6 million of benefits. Lets say they each get a hundred pound a week (although the figure is much higher with housing benefit etc).
Then that's £360,000,000 EVERY SINGLE WEEK
CRIKEY
Black Sabbath (06/06/2008 at 11:51)
Wrong, they can try to spend a little less - cut out the public sector non-jobs we ALL pay for!
Or perhaps pull the troops out of I-rak?
Drew_Peacock, stockport (06/06/2008 at 11:57)
This was an organised thing with agreed speeds and all the rest of it...Typically British. We should be more like the French and just do it!...direct action is required.
jomov, Manchester (06/06/2008 at 12:00)
Cheeky, lazy swines.
Audenshaw Bob (06/06/2008 at 12:03)
Some protesters travelled up from Devon, some from Dunfries. I based my calculations on hard facts.
Think of the pollution caused yesterday too. I have asthma.
Bikers are a menace on the roads as it is, weaving in and out of traffic, not indicating, always speeding etc.
Pay up like everyone else.
sparky9979, Sale (06/06/2008 at 12:26)
Alan Kelly (06/06/2008 at 12:34)
Your argument to be inaccurate. It is because the present budget set by the Government was done so with a reliance on fuel duty income commensurate with the price being in the region of £1 per litre. This meant that for every £1 spent on fuel some 65p would end up balancing the budget within the parameters set by the government.
Now that fuel is at £1.15 to £1.20 then the increase in revenue is going straight into government coffers. In effect is is pure profit. The government are now receiving 25 to 30 pence per litre over and above what they require to balance their figures.
Please do not continue with your argument and scaremongering because it is flawed. It would be easy for the government to set their income level as a figure rather than a percentage which would mean that the rise in petrol price would be significantly smaller than it has been but, hey, why shoot the cash cow?
jomov, Manchester (06/06/2008 at 12:39)
Fuel prices are too high and we have things that can be cut down to compensate...a good start would be our oh so generous benefit systems that is being abused....
Black Flag (06/06/2008 at 12:40)
There's a very simple way of doing that; increase fuel duty (whilst also removing the exceptions for red diesel) and reduce income tax. As fuel duty is much harder to evade than income tax, it would massively reduce the scope for tax evasion.