MANCHESTER'S tram system ground to a halt for four hours following a power failure which hit its key operations centre.
Some Metrolink commuters had to be helped by ladder from trams to ground level when they came to an abrupt standstill between stations.
Other angry passengers complained that they waited in vain at stations, not knowing that the trams had stopped.
One said: "Nobody had the faintest idea what was going on. You would have thought that Metrolink could have got staff out to tell people - or at the very least put up a poster at each station."
Trams on the entire system were immobilised around 10am yesterday and there was no service on the system until 2pm when it finally resumed.
Problems began on Sunday night with a power failure which hit the area around Queens Road, Cheetham Hill. United Utilities were able to restore connections - but not to the Metrolink nerve centre.
Power was available to overhead lines which supply trams but there was no power for services including vital signalling and communications systems.
The tram company said it was able to make use of a stand-by generator which it said got them through yesterday's commuter rush-hour period.
But then it began struggling to cope with demand before ceasing to work, bringing services on the entire system to a halt.
Metrolink was able to bring in a second, more powerful generator but it was around four hours before any kind of service was re-introduced.
A spokesman said: "We are unsure of the precise nature of the problem which led to the loss of power. United Utilities was informed and we did what we could to keep trams running.
"We managed to get through the peak morning rush-hour but the first generator was just not powerful enough to cope with demands on it, and eventually stopped. We didn't put out notices warning passengers of problems because up to that point we believed we could keep the system going.
"Once the generator failed, we had no means of operating signalling equipment on the network, communicating with our drivers, or operating passenger information systems at stations."
One traveller said: "We were stuck outside Cornbrook for up to two hours and in the end were brought down on ladders from the tram to the ground.
"Somebody's wheelchair had to be dismantled and carried down the ladders while the person who was in it was helped down."
A grandfather from Sale said: "I sat on the tram outside Stretford station for about an hour. It slowly moved into the station and we were allowed off.
"I ended up walking into Manchester and was more than two hours late for work."
United Utilities said it took a while to locate the source of the fault on a high voltage cable. Once that had been done engineers began immediate repair work.
A spokesman said: "We were prepared to work right into the night if necessary. We have been in constant touch with Metrolink to appraise them of developments."
Services are back to normal.
Were you affected by the power failure? Have your say.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Mr Manchester (19/05/2008 at 14:11)
Arrest that man!
Simon B, The North West. (19/05/2008 at 14:22)
your telling us they dont have a UPS or a backup generator already in place?
Thats well out of order.
Karney for head of GMPTA(formerly MC Spanner) (19/05/2008 at 14:24)
They are a rudderless bunch of fools mismanaged by a bigger fool who got his just desserts on 1 May.
Con Charge Bye Bye
Ex Bus Driver 118 118, Manchester (19/05/2008 at 14:37)
Thats my ten pence worth
Trevor Thomas (19/05/2008 at 14:46)
jomov, Manchester (19/05/2008 at 14:56)
Probably not!
Infact it is more likely that if people were to use PT it would not beable to deal with the numbers. You can barely get on it now nevermind get a seat!
Kurt Stephens, Sale (19/05/2008 at 15:00)
Since the inception back in the early 1990's the system as always been massively underfunded.
Hopefully with Phase 3a money, and potentially TIF money we can have a system that we can be truely proud off.
Surely those who want the system to be improved would argue for greater investment in the system, and in reality we all know that realistically there is only one way that will be achieved.
didarunna2spain, Tarragona Spain. (19/05/2008 at 15:03)
Audenshaw Bob (19/05/2008 at 15:06)
Fancy losing weight? Ditch you comfortable acr and use the Metrolink. Should there be a power cut on Scots on the line you can walk home instead.
Fancy a fight? No problem. Many fellow passengers will be more than willing to take you on, sometimes without you having to ask.
Like sitting in litter? You'll love the Metrolink.
Like standing up and being squashed? No problem.
Transport you can(t) rely on.
jomov, Manchester (19/05/2008 at 15:08)
Karney for head of GMPTA(formerly MC Spanner) (19/05/2008 at 15:15)
Yes - but more Tax is not the way to pay.
BigK (19/05/2008 at 15:53)
WALK INSTEAD!
Mark,Radcliffe. (19/05/2008 at 16:08)
Timberman, MANCHESTER (19/05/2008 at 16:25)
ace, manchester (19/05/2008 at 16:46)
kindofnew (19/05/2008 at 17:04)
surely this proves that metrolink needs more money to bring the service up to scratch and to improve redundancy? the current infrastructure is stretched so far that anything even slightly abnormal makes the whole system fall over.
metrolink was underfuned from the start.
raising money via a congestion charge to expand and improve the system are the only choice.
PW, Manchester (19/05/2008 at 17:24)
Pull the other one.
Karney for head of GMPTA(formerly MC Spanner) (19/05/2008 at 17:29)
Metrolink was not underfunded.
Raisng money by C-Charge is not the ONLY choice.
Amazing how many breakdowns there have been in the last few weeks...just before an announcement.
It would make the simpler amongst us believe that it is a good case for investement.
And Ace, I know you only have two phrases " Brich" and "Fat Cat" but this is GMPTE who are responsible for the lack of power
markyboy (19/05/2008 at 17:42)
why should joe public pay so they can make even bigger profits?.
gmpte is a joke, pity more members didnt suffer the same fate as jolly roger, or better still they should ALL be named and shamed in the MEN!!!.
Timberman, MANCHESTER (19/05/2008 at 17:53)
It's funny how a 150 year old national rail system is only now being upgraded. I don't use the Metro because it goes nowhere I want to go, so why should I pay a tax to line some fat cat's pockets.
Ed_Manchester, Manchester (19/05/2008 at 17:57)
sarahx, manchester (19/05/2008 at 18:52)
sarahx, manchester (19/05/2008 at 18:58)
kindofnew (19/05/2008 at 19:44)
we all pay tax for things that we dont use: i pay for the NHS to sort out over eaters and smokers. i pay council tax to send other peoples childern to school, and i pay tax to keep people who cant be bothered to get jobs. but i dont mind, cos its for the good of society.
a densly built up city centre like manchester can not support many more cars, fact. you cant build any more roads in a city.
the C charge, if it happens (which to be honest, i dont belive it will) has the potential to cut congestion, improve the quality of life for those living near roads and give manchester a decent public transport system. which will lead to more investment and a better city for everyone.
if it doesnt happen, expect the roads to get even more overcrowded, you just cant fit any more cars on them and manchesters creeking half arsed public transport infrastructure to get worse, as ironicly, an increase in cars will actualy encourage more people onto the inadequate public transport infrastructure.
in the long tearm, unless central government decided to just give the money - which as we know in this country does not happen.
by the way, i'm in no way a hippy, just someone who see's sense
rammylad, ramsbottom (19/05/2008 at 19:53)