EVERY car coming into Manchester is being snapped by a new network of police spy cameras.
Each day, 600,000 motorists' journeys are being captured, and the data will be stored for five years.
The cameras have been installed on the 12 major routes into the city, making it virtually impossible to travel into the middle of Manchester and not have your number plate recorded.
Manchester is the first city outside London to use Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras in this way.
Police will store details of the licence plate, colour of car and a time stamp on a central computer. They say it will help combat terrorism, crime and vehicle theft.
But civil rights campaigners fear the system means drivers are being subjected to `mass surveillance' as they go about their daily business.
The Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras have been set up around the city centre to capture vehicles travelling in and out on all major routes. The system records vehicle details and checks them with the Police National Computer, the DVLA database in Swansea and also local police intelligence databases.
Database
It can identify stolen vehicles, track cars used by terrorists, criminals and banned drivers and spot car tax and insurance dodgers.
James Welch, legal director of the civil rights group Liberty, said: "We have no problem with its use to locate vehicles whose owners police firmly suspect of having committed an offence.
"But it shouldn't be used for mass surveillance, or to target people the police have a hunch are up to no good." The fixed cameras began operating this month, with details - not photos - fed to the national database. They scan details of cars travelling at up to 100mph.
Greater Manchester Police also uses mobile ANPR systems in patrol cars and there are fixed cameras in other places, including the Trafford Centre.
Manchester is thought to be the first city outside London with a ring of cameras around the entire centre - and cameras in the capital are also used to enforce the congestion charge.
All major motorways are also covered.
Assistant Chief Constable Dave Thompson said the fixed cameras `will bring enormous benefits and aid us in protecting our communities'.
Sheila Ranger, of the RAC Foundation, said: "Our worry with the ANPR system is that it will encourage some people not to register their vehicles at all."
What do you think? Have your say.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Stretford Born Blue, Brooklands (19/05/2008 at 09:28)
chris.city, Manchester (19/05/2008 at 09:30)
Karney for head of GMPTA(formerly MC Spanner) (19/05/2008 at 09:37)
Anybody fancy a bet
1. There will be no TIF announcement before the by election in Crewe
2. Manchester will be the winner
It's almost as if they were getting ready but maybe I am being cynical.
GOD IS A BLUE, Failsworth (19/05/2008 at 09:47)
Ding Ding Ding !!!
wayneold, manc (19/05/2008 at 10:15)
Problem solved! you'd get a ton on the Mancunian way no problem, its not as if its chocker block!
Chris, Irlam (19/05/2008 at 10:37)
ace, manchester (19/05/2008 at 10:41)
Kurt Stephens, Sale (19/05/2008 at 10:43)
This will help reduce the costs of the infrastructure, if they are funded by an alternative source.
Think we'll be getting plenty of good news about the TIF bid over the next few weeks.
The sun is out, and I'm happy.
Black Flag (19/05/2008 at 10:44)
I've never been a fan of the idea before, but I think the time has come for each police force to be controlled by a directly elected chief, with a responsibility for setting the budget and controlling priorities.
Give the electorate a direct choice between endless spy cameras or more feet on the beat and see where public opinion lies.
jomov, Manchester (19/05/2008 at 10:56)
ace, manchester (19/05/2008 at 11:09)
Karney for head of GMPTA(formerly MC Spanner) (19/05/2008 at 11:12)
Black Flag - I thought you weren't in favour of referenda. I agree with you sentiments though.
Timberman, MANCHESTER (19/05/2008 at 11:18)
Get the number of good joiner.
game, set & match (19/05/2008 at 11:24)
Stretford Born Blue, Brooklands
19/05/2008 at 09:28
_____________________________________
On that basis you would be happy to have cameras in your living room checking if you are smoking in front of children (surely a law for the future), taking drugs, watching pirate DVDs, paying your TV licence, committing domestic violence?? Where do you draw the line? Saying 'Nowt to hide, nowt to worry about' is too simplistic.
Mr Angry, Bury (19/05/2008 at 11:28)
You are right in this assertion that the police are now a kind of government agency but it was not this lot who started it.
It was begun by my all time hate figure, Thatcher ( I used to get up early in the morning so I could hate her a bit longer) at the time of the miners strike
She wanted to crush the working classes and the trade unions and used the police as a kind of private army to impose her semi fascist ideology. They were bribed to do so by a pay increase but the penalty was that they were now to be used to impose whatever ideology the government of the day wanted to implement
New Labour are continuing this by using them to clamp down on petty infringements of by laws and to assist them in the implementation of their surveillance state
The police are no longer an impartial outfit which deals with questions of law and order and keeping the streets safe from scrotes
Come-On-City. Manchester, formerly of Brooklyn. (19/05/2008 at 11:34)
I do have something to hide - my privacy - to come and go as I please without the states knowledge and permission.
Ive really had enough of this nanny government!
Timberman, MANCHESTER (19/05/2008 at 11:42)
reason to complain.
Black Flag (19/05/2008 at 11:42)
Mr Angry, on this occasion, I’m in agreement with you.
Come-On-City. Manchester, formerly of Brooklyn. (19/05/2008 at 11:46)
robbie (19/05/2008 at 11:48)
i back this. i have no problem with them capturing my car (if i could drive). i dont mind them getting me in the street either. i would have no worry giving my DNA to be held, or carrying an id.
People will moan at anything these days..
perfectic.....
Kurt Stephens, Sale (19/05/2008 at 11:49)
Or is this not quite one of their pet issues, and as such not an issue that is 'deserving' of such treatment?
Steviepab, Manchester (19/05/2008 at 11:49)
Big Brother is watching.
Kurt Stephens, Sale (19/05/2008 at 11:51)
Oh well, there was me thinking that they wanted the views from anyone who could be bothered responding.
robbie (19/05/2008 at 11:56)
The police are no longer an impartial outfit which deals with questions of law and order and keeping the streets safe from scrotes
Mr Angry, Bury
19/05/2008 at 11:28
you dont half talk some rubbish...
an infringment of the law is an infringment.. no matter how big or small it should be punished.
Come-On-City. Manchester, formerly of Brooklyn. (19/05/2008 at 12:21)
If you're free this afternoon go down to your nearest police station and hand in your dna sample.
You clearly know nothing of history and the dangers of a surveillance state.