FUEL protesters staged a demonstration at the entrance of a Cheshire oil refinery last night.
Around 100 farmers and truckers, who were on foot, gathered at the entrance to Shell's Stanlow oil refinery at Ellesmere Port.
Tom Haughton, a spokesman for the group, said 50 fuel tankers were shut outside the plant.
He said: "There were over 100 hauliers and farmers who blocked the road on foot.
"I think 40 or 50 tankers were blocked out. There were 300 to come in, so they tell us."
A large police presence was at the site although the scene was peaceful and no arrests were understood to have been made. Police said the road was not blocked.
But one of the organisers, Merfyn Parry, said: "We blocked the road and were asking lorries not to go into the refinery and some of them agreed.
"We were then told that if we did not move we would be arrested.
"Our aim was to highlight the amount of tax on fuel which has gone through the roof.
"Fuel is a major expenditure for farmers and hauliers. It is crippling many of their businesses.
"Some of us have come from as afield as Anglesey and Oswestry to make our point and that's what we have done.
"We're not an organisation as such, we're just a group of people who are determined to fight this.
"One of the things the government can do is reduce the amount of revenue gained from fuel."
As they left, some of the protesters shouted that they would return tonight to continue their demonstration.
But Mr Parry said no firm plans had yet been set for further protests at Stanlow.
"We didn't purposefully arrange this to coincide with the local elections but I suppose it's good timing."
The Stanlow refinery was the centre of the fuel protests in 2000 which caused some garages to run out of petrol.
Tweet
Fuel protest at oil refinery
May 02, 2008
Stanlow oil refinery at Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, where fuel protesters were blocking the entrance to the Shell refinery

Showing comments 1 to 9 and replies | View All
Mr Angry, Bury (02/05/2008 at 09:57)
Leo B (02/05/2008 at 11:02)
point out
The Right to Reply (02/05/2008 at 11:08)
Black Flag (02/05/2008 at 11:50)
Given a choice between taxing people for working, through income tax and NI, or taxing people for burning fuel, with the pollution and resource depletion that goes along with it, fuel duty seems the more sensible option to me.
Grief Tourist, Tameside (02/05/2008 at 11:53)
Call me Dave, Manchester (02/05/2008 at 13:13)
The recent increase in the cost of a barrel of crude oil has meant that Greedy Gordon has made enough in extra taxation from oil companies to reduce the duty on diesel by the equivelent of 9p. That 9p could save a number of businesses from liquidation
But Gordon isn't listening!
kendomat, Salford (02/05/2008 at 13:22)
Taxing fuel to the point british hauliers are put out of business is not the answer either, as it will put them out of business on the rock and role and cost us more in state benefits.
Its ok for those luck few who do not need a car to throw their veiws around about tax of fuel, and people right to protest.
But the short fact of it is, our society runs on fuel. from transport of key goods, services (police, fire, ambulance) air ports for international business, cars to ge to work, as many live far away from place of work..
Next people will suggest we take a step back in time, and build houses next to places of employment (mines and mills), and live / work .for the rest of their livestheir that would save alot of fuel.
Roger Jones's P45 (formerly MC Spanner) (02/05/2008 at 13:52)
It's bad enough we are paying farmers through the nose for food. There haven't been many farmers recently bleating about not making a profit from farmimg.....
Maybe we should boycott farms until they reduce the price of eggs,milk,wheat, Fruit & Veg
BluePolarBear, ex of Stockport (02/05/2008 at 23:52)
The protesters do strike me as a generally right wing group.It would as one post suggested earlier,make sense to transport these loads by rail,and this would make environmental as well as ultimate economic sense.Hauliers do receive red diesel too,as do farmers (though I sympathise with farmers who have been ripped off and downtrodden by the big retailer's).If it was a truly free market,then they would receive no subsidies at all.They seem to favour a freemarket when it suits them,while taking state subsidies at the same time.Perhaps they should make their minds up.If they don't like the government taking duty,maybe they want to lose their subsidy too.?