DAVID Cameron has urged Labour rebels to vote with his party to stop the 10p income tax rate being scrapped.
The Conservative leader - speaking exclusively to the Manchester Evening News last night - said there was a mood of "depression" on the Labour back-benches over the issue.
And he said he wanted to "work together" with rebels to see Gordon Brown defeated in a crunch vote next week.
"This is a very serious moment for this government," said Mr Cameron. "It will hit 5.3 million of the lowest-paid people in the country.
"It is hitting them with a tax rise at a time when grocery bills are going up and mortgages will be going up. They are finding it difficult to make ends meet anyway.
"This is a really serious problem and we are asking [the government] to stop and think again.
"We have put forward an amendment and we want to find some way of stopping this.
"The mood is very depressed on the Labour side because they think, `Did we go into politics to hit the working poor with big tax bills?'
"I hope we can work together with Labour rebels to stop this."
Mr Cameron was speaking to the MEN as Mr Brown met with his MPs to outline ways his government could help those hit by the scrapping of the 10p rate.
The prime minister addressed a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party after it emerged more than 70 rebels had signed a motion expressing "concern" about the move.
The House of Commons Treasury Committee has claimed single people with no children earning under £18,500 will lose up to £232 a year.
Mr Brown was coming under fire on a second front last night over the Bank of England's £50bn plan to allow banks to swap risky mortgage debts for government bonds.
Credit crisis
Chancellor Alistair Darling said the move was necessary to prevent the credit crisis causing further damage to Britain's banking system.
One of the country's biggest mortgage lenders, Abbey, cut rates on some of their deals last night in response.
Mr Cameron said his party backed the Bank of England's decision. He denied the move was a "bail-out" and said his party had held long talks with Bank officials before offering their support.
But he said it was clear there had been government "failings" that had caused the move to become necessary.
"This is not a bail-out," he said. "It is a Bank of England package. This is the right thing to do because it is in everybody's interests to get the money markets moving again.
"It is clear, though, that there have been failings in terms of allowing the credit boom to run out of control."
Mervyn King, the Bank of England governor, said lenders taking advantage of the scheme - which will be worth an initial £50bn over three years - would have to provide assets of "significantly greater" value than the Treasury bills they receive to avoid the taxpayer taking on the risk of potential losses.
"[This is] not part of this scheme to take us back to the excessive lending of a year or more ago," he said. "There does need to be some adjustment of the types of loans that were made in the mortgage market.
"It is to return the banking system... back to a state of normality. It is not part of the scheme to prevent desirable adjustments in the mortgage market from taking place."
Mr Cameron was speaking to the MEN after visiting Bury and Salford ahead of the local elections on May 1.
In Tory-run Bury, he attacked government plans for huge "polyclinics", saying they would force up to 1,700 GPs surgeries across the country - one in five - to close.
The polyclinics would house up to 25 GPs, open from 8am to 8pm, and have facilities for minor operations.
But Mr Cameron said: "It's a fad. It's going to be a huge waste of money."
Read David Ottewell's blog by clicking here.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
shayla (22/04/2008 at 08:17)
Mr Cameron listens to people, he is balanced in his views, he seems to want to do what's right, without the ego and power obsessed attitude.
Mr Angry, Bury (22/04/2008 at 09:02)
This opportunist, sound bite merchant will say anything to get votes
Raindazed (22/04/2008 at 09:44)
Tony Blair is not back is he?
Big Dave has finally given us a clue of what his party can do for us. Labour is a mess. The future is blue.
The Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (22/04/2008 at 10:26)
A. Get rid of the 10% tax band
B. Increase the tax free band to compensate.
He is being a little bit mischievious here although who wouldn't given the mess Gordon has made
lebist, Blackley (22/04/2008 at 10:58)
ace, manchester (22/04/2008 at 11:46)
Black Flag (22/04/2008 at 12:04)
Your comment "never mind worrying about tax protect the voters," is a bit of a u-turn, considering that you spoke out against my suggestions for prisons because they would cost money.
alvinlwh (22/04/2008 at 12:10)
ace, manchester (22/04/2008 at 12:12)
JohnB, Manchester (22/04/2008 at 12:16)
mylifeinthemafia (22/04/2008 at 12:19)
ace, manchester (22/04/2008 at 12:22)
David,North M/C (22/04/2008 at 13:04)
Mr Angry, Bury (22/04/2008 at 13:16)
The death penalty will not be reintroduced because the liberal elite mafia who control the country (and the EU, our masters) do not want it. They all live in nice parts of the country so crime does'nt affect them
If there was a referendum on it I am convinced the majority would vote for it to be brought back so there will not be.
Politicians do not listen to public opinion, they serve themselves, not the electorate
The Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (22/04/2008 at 13:27)
Have you check ed the Conservatives Website. That would be a good start becuase chances are you have missed something.
I think that whilst the death penalty is from a dark age, so is terrorism and the random murderous intent that is on our street. If it saves the life of a decent person, then it should be brought back, subject to a strong burden of proof.
jomov, Manchester (22/04/2008 at 13:33)
Statistics were kept for the 5 years that capital punishment was suspended in Britain (1965-1969) and these showed a 125% rise in murders that would have attracted a death sentence. Whilst statistically all this is true, it does not tell one how society has changed over nearly 40 years. It may well be that the murder rate would be the same today if we had retained and continued to use the death penalty. It is impossible to say that only this one factor affects the murder rate. Easier divorce has greatly reduced the number of domestic murders, unavailability of poisons has seen poisoning become almost extinct whilst tight gun control had begun to reduce the number of shootings, however, drug related gun crime is on the increase and there have been a spate of child murders recently. Stabbings have increased dramatically as have the kicking and beating to death of people who have done something as minor as arguing with someone or jostling them in a crowd, i.e. vicious and virtually motiveless killings. As in most Western countries, greatly improved medical techniques have saved many victims who would have previously died from their injuries (e.g. Josie Russell). Careful analysis of the situation in Britain between 1900 and the outbreak of the second World War in 1939 seems to point to the death penalty being a strong deterrent to what one might call criminal murders, i.e. those committed in the furtherance of theft, but a very poor deterrent to domestic murders, i.e. those committed in the heat of the moment. A very large proportion of the victims of those hanged during this period were wives and girlfriends, with a small number of husbands and boyfriends. So where a crime was thought about in advance the criminal had time to consider the consequences of their action and plan differently. For instance they may decide to rob a bank at the weekend to avoid coming into contact with the staff and to do so without carrying firearms.
jomov, Manchester (22/04/2008 at 13:33)
jomov, Manchester (22/04/2008 at 13:39)
Black Flag (22/04/2008 at 13:50)
Mr Angry, Bury (22/04/2008 at 14:32)
The Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (22/04/2008 at 14:51)
I think you are wrong. It would be a big vote winner. Every survey in modern times that I have seen seems to back it.
It is only a vote loser when there has been a miscarriage of justice.
Black Flag (22/04/2008 at 14:52)
In contrast, most people I know who oppose the death penalty feel strongly enough that they would not vote for a party that supported it.
So, supporting the death penalty would probably cost a party more votes than it gained them. I think most politicians are aware of that and stay clear.
Come-On-City. Manchester, formerly of Brooklyn. (22/04/2008 at 15:00)
Why does every debate on this site end up shouting about the death penalty or the birch???
jomov, Manchester (22/04/2008 at 15:11)
Victor Meldrew's Codpiece (22/04/2008 at 15:32)