MPs are calling for a ban on child Thai boxing which pits children as young as five against each other in the ring.
Clubs have sprung up across the country, including Greater Manchester, despite martial arts experts expressing serious reservations about the `sport'.
A Channel 4 Cutting Edge documentary, to be screened on Thursday, went inside the world of Muay Thai boxing.
It features several children, including Wigan twins Miah and Kian Flanagan, who are aged just five. Both are said to be seasoned fighters.
In one extract, Miah is seen sobbing at the side of the boxing ring while another part of the film shows her twin brother Kian hit in the face by a sparring partner.
The twins began lessons seven months ago, encouraged by parents Darren and Lisa.
Quantity surveyor Mr Flanagan said the training will help his daughter defend herself when she is older and believes he could turn his son into a world champion.
Mr Flanagan insists he has told his daughter she can give up if she does not want to continue with the martial art. He said: "Every time she goes in that ring, there's always a worry she'll start crying."
The martial art is legal although parents have to sign a disclaimer.
Shadow Minister for Sport, Hugh Robertson, said: "This activity seems completely unsuitable for young children and should be stopped at once. It's clearly a child protection issue."
Tweet
Call to ban child Thai boxing
April 21, 2008

Showing comments 1 to 24 and replies | View All
Le Comte Bobelesque d'Ancoats, MANCHESTER (21/04/2008 at 13:20)
Haaaaa haaaaa ha ha. Don't make me laugh. They're only just into dry pyjamas at night. Seasoned fighters ... ha ha ha ha ha.
Jo (21/04/2008 at 14:09)
A couple of five year olds aren't old enough to decide whether they want to take up a martial art. And why would any parent WANT to see their five-year-old get hit in the face and burst into tears?
marc (21/04/2008 at 14:30)
The Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (21/04/2008 at 15:52)
Its certainly better than most five year olds who learn how to use a remote control/joyskick while their parents sit on their flabby backsides smoking drinking and swearing.
Careless Whisper (21/04/2008 at 16:00)
Le Comte de Bobelesque, Manchester, formerly Cracow (21/04/2008 at 16:05)
I must discuss schools with you too shortly. Had any thoughts? Harrow? Westminster?
the beer baron (21/04/2008 at 16:21)
marc (21/04/2008 at 16:26)
i was thinking of sending Marc Jnr to Ace's School Of 'Ard Knocks.
DOOBYDO (21/04/2008 at 19:59)
Appalled citizen, Swinton (22/04/2008 at 07:58)
The Rt Hon Dr Rev MC Spanner MP QC FCA FRICS JP OK (22/04/2008 at 09:20)
I don't give a monkey about dogs. Once again you are trying to change a sensible subject by throwing in a nonsense argument. Last time I looked Mauy Thai does not involve biting each other to death.
As the nice lady says - It teaches discipline as well as fighting skills. I bet the proportion of kids who do contact sports like this carrying knives to school is much lower. It provides exercise and has a social aspect.
Yet another wet liberal control freakery nanny state story.
Look at Mr Angry. I bet he never did Thai Boxing and now look at him
Le Comte de Bobelesque, Manchester, formerly Cracow (22/04/2008 at 09:34)
You can't spout the tale that the 'sport' is a self defence system. It is a visual entertainment, like wrestling, boxing, football etc.
Let's be frank, sending your kid to Thai boxing is just another way of trying to be different. Put them in the cubs, it'll do 'em more good.
Evangelist, Rochdale (22/04/2008 at 12:00)
Proud Mancunian (22/04/2008 at 13:07)
Some people just dont like fun.
Next they will try and ban monkey knife fights!
Geordie1 (22/04/2008 at 14:03)
This martial art has been around in the UK since 1977 so it isn’t a new craze sweeping the country, as some news articles have deemed it to be. It teaches fitness, self defence and discipline. Kids and Adults alike can not use Thai Boxing outside of the gym, unless under extreme provocation, as it is against the rules and regulations of their UK Muay Thai Licence.
Kids are never pushed into fighting and if they do decide to fight there is either no head contact without a head guard or very light contact with. If the doubters out there take a few minutes to watch a kids UK Thai Boxing fight they will notice that they are fully padded up and the ref will stop the fight if head contact or foul blows are made.
People need to be told that some gyms had been approached and filmed for several hours before being told that the footage just wasn’t what they are looking for. The media have been digging around looking for the exception rather than the norm, the pushy parents that will do anything to live their lives through their kids.
The parents who let their kids enjoy Thai and don’t put any pressure on them have not been approached. Because of these “pushy parents” being portrayed on the channel 4 documentary all parents who allow their kids to do Thai will be looked at as if they are abusing their kids…..this is not the case.
The kids that are abusing their Thai Boxing knowledge to bully and intimidate should be banned from their gyms. The parents who think it is appropriate to push their kids and make them fight when they are not ready should take a step back and ask themselves is this what my child wants or is this what I want.
MP’s are now talking about banning the martial art for kids… I think that, before making any decisions, they need to attend one of the many well run kids training sessions at a local Thai Boxing gym. The kids are training hard but are always smiling and having fun.
You do not hear any complaints about kids taking part in karate or any other martial art and in fact there are probably more injuries to kids playing football than in Thai.
Le Comte de Bobelesque, formerly a frog (22/04/2008 at 14:22)
marc (22/04/2008 at 14:33)
evangelist, i'm flabbergasted by the ignorance you display in this comment.
1) a contact sport is not a child protection issue, unless children are being forced to fight eachother in which case it would fall under the category of physical abuse and neglect.
2) how exactely are social services (actually, its called 'children's services' now but considering you seem to envisage the department in a blindly ignorant, 1970's way we'll stick with your terminology) stopping parents from disciplining their children? i want examples, hard facts and evidence. i have never once in all the time i've worked for social services seen a social worker stop a parent from disciplining a child. however, i've seen them protect children from paedophiles, murderers and junkie parents within the boundaries of legislation which quite often works against them rather than with them.
3) the reason social services have 'kept quiet' is because no one has made a referral. social services reacts to the concerns of the public and other professionals. therefore, NOBODY THINKS THIS IS A CHILD PROTECTION ISSUE. do you want me to spell that out for you?
okay, rant over.
alvinlwh (22/04/2008 at 14:57)
Odysseus, Stockport (22/04/2008 at 15:14)
If you watch the media footage, they have to concentrate on an over zealous father because when they cut back to the two boys fighting, in truth they are hardly laying a glove on each other. Which is true of most children’s fights. I have always been most impressed with the way the Kick/Thai Boxing community have impressed on young children the need for restraint and self control when fighting. It’s a great sport, I would encourage all to have a go.
DOOBYDO (22/04/2008 at 19:33)
kitty (23/04/2008 at 22:18)
s.smith (24/04/2008 at 21:51)
There are many other non agressive sports (if you can really call battering someone unconscious a sport) that kids can use to keep fit and build confidence in themselves without resolving to violent assault on another child,This "sport" sits squarely with the dog fighting,hare coursing and other obscene blood sports enjoyed primarily by low class,low morals and low intelligence people.As the channel 4 programme proved.
Quite plainly these people are using their children to try and boost their own egos.I wonder how long these children would continue fighting without constant pressure from their parents.
I'm sure if they found their child in the street fighting they wouldn't stand back and encourage them on.whats the difference ?
Why is it legal to encourage them to violently attack another child.
BAN IT NOW !!!
trish leighton (26/05/2008 at 22:02)
pooo hole (31/10/2008 at 08:41)