MILLIONS of pounds are being paid to people who have tripped and injured themselves on pavements in Greater Manchester.
Compensation claims cost Manchester council tax payers £5 million in just eight years.
And in the last year alone Salford council has had to pay out £1.7m in so-called `trip-and-slip' claims.
Graham Stringer, MP for Manchester Blackley, attacked `a growing compensation culture'.
He said: "I have absolutely no doubt that Manchester, like any major city, faces a number of claims that are simply fraudulent. Manchester is not unique in facing these problems.
"It is part of a growing compensation culture. There is something offensive about the way some companies tout for business."
Other councils have seen reductions in recent times.
Rochdale spent £1.4m on slip-and-trip compensation in 2003/04, but only £207,866 in 2006/07 due to a zero tolerance policy on quick settlements.
Since January 2000, Manchester council has made 1,473 payouts for such claims, at an average of £3,290 apiece.
Documents seen by the M.E.N. show one resident who fractured an ankle in a fall on Cotefield Road, Benchill, Wythenshawe, in 2002 claimed £30,000 when the case was settled four years later.
Payment
That is nearly three times as much as the standard government compensation payment of £11,000 to the husband or wife of someone killed as the result of a violent crime.
Other bumper payouts include:
£23,000 for a trip-and-slip incident in Clee Avenue, Longsight, in 2005, that resulted in a fractured arm,
£20,125 for a `non-fracture' leg injury in Clayton in 2001,
£19,550 for a similar ankle injury sustained in Heaton Park in 2002 and settled earlier this year.
The information is contained in a sheet listing all public liability personal injury claims dealt with by the town hall's legal department since 2000.
The vast majority are trip-and-slip claims - where someone has sustained an injury they say is the result of the council failing to maintain its roads and pavements. Recipients can get a lump sum and money to cover loss of earnings.
Of these, 1,473 have resulted in payouts - either negotiated, or imposed by the courts - while 9,156 have not been paid.
The trip-slip payouts help make up a total compensation bill of £12.3m for Manchester council since 2000.
There were several claims for accidents in the workplace, incling a member of staff at a council depot in Bessemer Street, Gorton, who was hurt lifting an object in 2003 and received £13,900 for leg injuries.
More than £250,000 was paid out for industrial injuries, including £120,000 for a single case which involved respiratory problems.
A Manchester council spokeswoman said: "We take a robust approach to dealing with compensation claims."
The rest of the £12.3m compensation bill includes £2.18m paid out in relation to sexual and physical abuse at children's homes. The claims - most dating back to the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s - were brought by claimants who had spent time at Rosehill, Northenden, and Broome House, Didsbury.
What do you think? Have your say.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Cllr Shelmerdine Hulme. (04/04/2008 at 08:35)
GOD IS A BLUE, Failsworth (04/04/2008 at 09:00)
wkdboy1, Woodley (04/04/2008 at 09:08)
Maybe it is a protest over the proposed congestion charge, or naked swimming.
Voter (04/04/2008 at 09:11)
Big Stu, Salford (04/04/2008 at 09:23)
drew peacock, stockport (04/04/2008 at 09:27)
It isn't just this either is it...we are becoming a society of spongers and crooks. Much like the MP's who are supposed to represent us. Show us your expenses Mr Stringer....or are you one of them that is using public money to defend your "right" to not disclose how you squander our cash on your John Lewis items.
bluetony (04/04/2008 at 09:33)
sallyg, Lancs (04/04/2008 at 10:14)
polkyb (04/04/2008 at 10:54)
You'll probably find that most of the people who claimed were drunk or just not paying attention to where they were putting their feet... and the ambulance chasing solicitors should be outlawed by removing "no win - no fee" deals.
ace, manchester (04/04/2008 at 11:28)
Leo B (04/04/2008 at 11:43)
(It is arguable that the "compensation culture" has in large part been created by the Courts, who will rarely send any claimant away empty-handed, even in the face of the facts or grossly inflated damages schedules. Of course, it's only the insurers who are paying, with their bottomless pockets, isn't? Where do the judiciary think their money comes from?)
Mark Spencer, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire. (04/04/2008 at 11:59)
"£23,000 for a trip-and-slip incident in Clee Avenue, Longsight, in 2005, that resulted in a fractured arm."
Question for Mr Stringer - Would you let me fracture your arm if I paid you £23,000? You would not get the money straight away - you would have to see solicitors, medical people etc and then wait months or years for the money.
Grief Tourist, Tameside (04/04/2008 at 12:00)
jomov, Manchester (04/04/2008 at 12:01)
M C Spanner (04/04/2008 at 12:11)
An MP trying to sound in touch with the common people and their concerns.
Shame that our concerns are about having decent roads and pavements rather than the compo claim.
Still as a comment he won't top Gerry Sutcliffe MP who said after criticizing the increase in alcohol duty and being battered by Gordon Brown
"my comments do not reflect my views"
I wonder if that is true here and there is a bit of public concern before the council elections where Labour will get kicked out in Bury & Bolton
M C Spanner (04/04/2008 at 12:11)
Rugbygirl, Urmston (04/04/2008 at 12:14)
Charlie Wilmslow (04/04/2008 at 12:24)
Last year my partner and i were training for a marathon. I was running along and tripped on a very uneven pavinf stone and had cuits and bruises all over me but didn't claim compo.
My brother served in the Blues and Royals and we have to put up with this!
The Bobelesque, MANCHESTER (04/04/2008 at 12:32)
I don't blame anyone who genuinely injures themselves from claiming.
REDSEADOG, lovely thank's (04/04/2008 at 12:39)
If you have falled tripped go back with a camera and take several pic's of the obstruction and take a pic from a place near to showing the hold(obstruction and a landmark with a name so its commonly known and have a person witness the fall and take there name and contact no.
You do not have to have a camrea you can go back after your (trip to the hospital)note a decent solicitor and bang the compensation in.
If mcc did not spend money on stupid things like the mardi gras and b in the bang and other stupid ideas then the road and strret surfaces would be worked on and resolved.
Hence no claims being put in as the streets would be fine and tax payers money would not be used for silly things,in fact the tax payer should have a vote on what is being suggested and a letter should be sent to every applicant noting whats there money going on on a day to day bases.
derick (04/04/2008 at 12:50)
AdrianR, Warrington (04/04/2008 at 13:23)
As for blame, the Labour government repalced legal aid with "no win no fee".
Finally, the headline figures will include compenstion for injury, lost earnings and aother connected losses, plus the costs of the solicitors.
Mr Angry, Bury (04/04/2008 at 13:41)
This problem is fuelled by greedy, unscrupulous get rich quick lawyers who just do whatever they want.
They encourage people to make stupid claims and the reality is that insurers will usually pay smallish claims just to get rid of them as it costs too much to fully investigate them.
The lawyers settlements on costs, incidentally, are usually two or three times more than the claimant receives in damages.
Insurers then pass these costs on in the form of increased premiums so all these fraudsters do is just put up the cost of insurance for everyone, the same applies to council tax, when you get your new, higher bill for the forthcoming year, part of it is due to these bent lawyers.
Also, another negative effect is that this compensation culture has given rise to the health and safety fascists who seek to prohibit almost anything in case the council or whoever gets sued. Get rid of the compensation culture and the H & S fascists will be redundant and will disappear
I propose:
1, No claim to be considered without independent witnesses
2, If it transpires that the claim is completely fraudulent, the claimant is prosecuted for fraud and heavily fined
3, An end to no win no fee. If the claim is rejected, the claimant has to pay all the costs, plus an extra amount for administration charges
4, Any solicitor, after taking on more than three unsuccessful claims, is struck off and barred from practising
5, Persistent serial claimants who make false claims to be banned for life from ever making an insurance claim again, regardless of fault and circumstances
The law is a huge problem, it regulates itself, via the Law Society, and can do as it pleases,whilst every other business is burdened with an increasing amount of red tape
dessie, manchester (04/04/2008 at 13:54)
besides if pavements were safe there wouldnt be so many injuries, just walk down market street and you will probably find plenty of rocky slabs about!!!
jomov, Manchester (04/04/2008 at 14:37)
Falling down a man hole after being wolf whistled....mmmm!!!!