ANTI-CONGESTION charge campaigners have forced the first referendum for an elected mayor in Greater Manchester. Is it a cheap trick or valid exercise in local decision making?
Whether it's a cynical trick or a genuine attempt to restore the will of the people, you've got to hand it to the protesters from Manchester Against the Road Tolls for the latest twist in their campaign.
The group wanted the political chiefs supporting congestion charging to seek support from the people of Greater Manchester in a public referendum.
When the answer was a stern `no' - although a congestion charge referendum could still happen - M.A.R.T. members' idea was to put the Local Government Act of 2000 to use by urging the people of one of the local councils within the 10-strong group which makes up the Association Of Greater Manchester Authorities, the body bidding for public transport improvements in return for congestion charging, to call for an elected mayor.
If that works, the next step of M.A.R.T.'s campaign will see them support the election of a mayor who would in turn support their stance that congestion charging is nothing more than a `toll tax'.
While that might sound far-fetched, M.A.R.T. have already won the first stage of their battle by securing a mayoral referendum in Bury. Inspired by that success, they are now campaigning to do the same thing in Salford and Bolton.
In order to force a referendum on the issue of an elected mayor in each local authority, campaigners need the signatures of at least five per cent of a borough's electorate.
M.A.R.T. members went a stage further in Bury, collecting 8,500 signatures, and the local council must now poll the opinions of the borough's entire population within six months.
Campaign co-ordinator Sean Corker says the ultimate aim is that the people of Bury will be given the opportunity to have their say on the issue of congestion charging, albeit via the somewhat scenic route of a mayoral election.
Manpower
"We simply don't have the manpower to seek support for elected mayors across all 10 boroughs of Greater Manchester," Corker concedes, "but this could just be enough. We have masses of support now, but this literally started as a few guys in the pub who were opposed to congestion charging and felt that the vast majority of people would support that view."
Is he not worried M.A.R.T.'s campaign could cause chaos for local government if it succeeds in giving power to a candidate with only one issue in mind?
"What we are doing is not some cheap trick," says Corker. "It's just democracy."
To date there have been 35 referenda on whether to establish an elected mayor in English local authorities. Twelve have been passed and 23 rejected by voters.
One man who originally set out to make a monkey of the electoral mayor campaign was Stuart Drummond.
He won in Hartlepool after campaigning in the costume of H'Angus the Hartlepool United monkey mascot.
Drummond, a former call centre worker, says he initially sought election as a way of increasing publicity for H'Angus. But it wasn't long before he swapped the monkey suit for a lounge suit and he was recently re-elected with a massively increased majority.
Hartlepool now ranks as one of the country's best-performing authorities and Drummond is adamant that his independent position has been key to that achievement.
"If the referendum is positive and they get an elected mayor, they will discover that person has a lot of work to do," he warns.
There are perhaps more similarities between the situation in Bury and Torbay, which chose an elected mayor, Nick Bye, in 2005 following what the incumbent describes as a protest vote against the way the authority had been run. Today, Nick Bye agrees that choosing an elected mayor on the strength of a single issue is probably a bad idea. But he believes that elected mayors can be major boon for a local authority.
"You put your place on the map, you get the investment and that can only be good for an area," he says.
We'll have to wait and see whether the people of Bury think that an elected mayor is a good idea, or whether they simply want to make a monkey out of those proposing congestion charging.
See our interactive traffic map and take part in our traffic survey by clicking here.
Tweet
C-charge: Democracy in action?
February 07, 2008
Democracy in action, or cynical ploy?

Showing comments 1 to 23 and replies | View All
ace, manchester (07/02/2008 at 10:13)
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (07/02/2008 at 10:46)
Who decides which issues we should have a referendum on? What happens if this one-issue guy who potentially gets elected on the back of opposing congestion charging is clueless about every other issue, or worse still intent on wrecking as many proposals as possible?
One issue politics can be very dodgy ground.
Pentest (07/02/2008 at 10:49)
Scrap the 'C' charge in Manchester ...Or, watch all the shops in the city centre start closing one after the other.
Laura Norder, Didsbury (07/02/2008 at 10:56)
Oh, the irony.
Bring it on, I say, another campaign they'll lose.
Rob (Manchester Against Road Tolls) www.tamesidemart.co.uk www.manchestertolltax.com, Denton (07/02/2008 at 11:06)
"What happens if this one-issue guy who potentially gets elected on the back of opposing congestion charging is clueless about every other issue..."
Roy Oldham is the longest serving council leader in the UK. Are you telling me he is not clueless? At least with an elected mayor the voters get to choose who leads the council and get rid of any numpty that does not take the opinions of his electors seriously. From our petitioning it is obvious that most people in Tameside, Bolton and Salford want an elected mayor to listen to them.
ace, manchester (07/02/2008 at 11:09)
The problem with that view is most politicians dont really know what comes out of their mouths running up to voting? .and change their views and parties to many times.how many times has a politician changed parties halfway through their terms of office?
Craig (07/02/2008 at 11:14)
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (07/02/2008 at 11:18)
We have a referendum every 4 years - there are local elections this coming May. Vote then.
(But then you know you'll lose that, so it doesn't suit your argument.)
roger jones, Irlam,Salford. (07/02/2008 at 11:29)
Roger.
Mark Spencer, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire. (07/02/2008 at 11:29)
Call me Dave, Manchester (07/02/2008 at 11:48)
The London Congestion charge has failed - Traffic speeds are slower then before 2003. Does this mean that Manchester will be heading down the same road as London? I don't think so most of your buses would fail the LEZ test
At least MART are trying to bring some form of democracy to these proceedings - After all the lessons were learnt in the Scottish Capital - Referendum bad idea
Ms D, Manchester (07/02/2008 at 11:54)
Ms D, Manchester (07/02/2008 at 11:55)
Fran M, Stockport (07/02/2008 at 12:16)
Pentest (07/02/2008 at 12:40)
Chris, Irlam (07/02/2008 at 14:00)
Democracy in action!
And Roger - see you at the ballot box in May. Any chance you can be outside the Fiddlers Lane polling station around 1800H on election day?
Mark Spencer, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire. (07/02/2008 at 14:09)
Roy Oldham "only" got 500 or so more votes than the Tory's so if 251 people are of a mind to change - he can retire gracefully with a pension I could only dream of.
Pentest (07/02/2008 at 15:19)
Fran M, Stockport (07/02/2008 at 15:21)
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (07/02/2008 at 17:21)
ace, manchester (07/02/2008 at 17:55)
Your having a laugh mate the only difference now to how it was before in london is the charge? before the congestion charge the traffic was terrible "But people didnt get charged" but now the traffic is just as bad but now we get charged for the privalidge,You need to do your homework and ask some of the professional drivers who drive in and out of london every day? which i know a lot of cabbies and white van men who are sick to death of the charges and the congestion they have said for the first few months it was great but its now as bad as its ever been...GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT ABOUT CONGESTION AND THE CHARGES.
Wallace-Macpherson, Guildford (07/02/2008 at 19:25)
Fran M, Stockport (07/02/2008 at 19:54)