DRIVERS straying into Manchester's bus lanes have generated nearly £500,000 in fines in just 12 months.
A total of 28,000 motorists have been caught illegally using the lanes during peak periods.
Roadside cameras on one road alone - Wilmslow Road in south Manchester - accounted for 40 per cent of the fines and collected nearly £200,000.
The money raised from the £60 fines will be channelled back into improving transport.
And the cash bonanza could have been even greater after it emerged 5,000 bus lane cheats escaped fines because the paperwork wasn't sent out quickly enough. Motorists' campaigners said many drivers find it infuriating to be stuck in traffic jams alongside an empty bus lane.
Sean Corker, from Manchester Against Road Tolls, said: "I can understand the frustration of drivers who are sat in traffic jams when there are empty lanes beside them.
"It is always assumed that bus lanes will solve congestion. But before they are set up there should be research to show how many people they will carry.
"If they don't carry more passengers than ordinary traffic, then they shouldn't be there because they just cause congestion."
Manchester council set up a network of roadside cameras to ensure drivers did not stray into the lanes which are designated for buses, taxis and cyclists. A car equipped with hi-tech camera equipment also carried out daily monitoring of different routes.
A total of 12 fixed CCTV cameras, monitored by traffic controllers, were erected on major city routes last year.
In the first year of the scheme, £483,000 was raised through fines. The cash is ring-fenced, meaning it can only be used on highway improvements, bus and cycle schemes, and enforcement costs.
But the council admitted that `technical teething problems' meant they missing out on more than £300,000 in fixed penalty payments.
Problems
Of the drivers caught, 13,000 were in the camera-controlled bus lanes on Wilmslow Road. By law, all fines must be sent out within 28 days of the offence, but the council said that in 5,000 cases, this didn't happen.
A town hall official said: "In the very early days there were some technical teething problems with the equipment, which meant that 5,000 bus lane offences which were caught on cameras across the city could not be processed in time.
"The mistake would simply have been compounded by issuing the penalty notices beyond the legal time limit and so the tickets were voided."
Manchester University student Rachael Walsh did receive a ticket when she used the bus lane. But the 20-year-old from Fallowfield had her fine cancelled because of a different kind of blunder.
She said: "I wasn't sent a £60 fine, I just got a final notice to say I had to pay £90 for using bus lanes on Wilmslow Road.
"I paid it but a few weeks later I got the money back. I did use the bus lane, but because I wasn't sent out the original £60 fine I didn't have to pay it. The council said they sent out a lot of fines like that by mistake."
According to figures obtained under Freedom of Information laws, a driver is caught every 38 minutes on average illegally using the bus lanes on Wilmslow Road.
And even without the cash from the motorists whose fines weren't sent out in time, the council raked in £193,080 from Wilmslow Road bus lane cheats between the beginning of October 2006 and the end of September this year. Drivers are handed a £60 fixed penalty notice for using bus lanes but pay only a £30 fine if they cough up within 14 days.
If the fine is not paid within 28 days it is increased to £90.
According to the council, none of the tickets that fell outside the 28 day timescale were actually issued to motorists.
What do you think of bus lanes? Have your say.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
Chris, Irlam (26/11/2007 at 09:15)
Wonder if a similar scheme for pedestrians would work?
Hmmm....
Mike the City fan (26/11/2007 at 09:25)
Beaufort (26/11/2007 at 09:41)
Please let's fine all these bus drivers who consistently go through red lights.
Munkey Boy, Audenshaw, Manchester (26/11/2007 at 10:13)
And since when did Sean Corker become the voice of reason in the transport world? Why does his group get so much publicity? Congrats to his PR people though, keep spinning ;-)
Anyway, good to see the money is going back into transport improvements anyway.
Dave (26/11/2007 at 10:22)
Great to see the council have finally got these powers to enforce the bus lanes.
Chris, Irlam (26/11/2007 at 11:35)
All this does is to further increase congestion and pollution.
Why is this admirable exactly?
Harvey (26/11/2007 at 11:38)
Agree with the comments about buses going through red lights in the city centre. This morning one did and then blocked a boxed junctio. This caused traffic to back up as no one else could go through.
I also thought that they were not allowed to set off whilst passengers are still paying either. I would have thought that this is distracting?
Blue Copey, Failsworth (26/11/2007 at 11:46)
Every bus lane is clearly marked with the hours indicating which vehicles can use the bus lane and between what times.
That chip is getting heavier isn't it Beaufort?
chris (26/11/2007 at 11:50)
Roads are NOT paid for out of your ‘road tax’. The vehicle excise duty is an annual tax on the use of motor vehicle on public roads. Roads and infrastructure come out of general taxation, get you facts right before spouting off.
As for ‘part time’ bus lanes, the highways department does do something to inform drivers that they can be used at certain times of the day, the signs next to the bus lane fulfill that purpose, the trouble is that most drivers are stupid.
Simon B, www.manchestertolltax.com (26/11/2007 at 11:56)
And now they are enforcing it with cameras.
ace, manchester (26/11/2007 at 12:01)
Si B1 (26/11/2007 at 12:28)
I was the victim of road rage earlier in the year because an individual didnt realise that you are allowed to use bus lanes off peak and took offence.
Ex Bus Driver 118 118, Manchester (26/11/2007 at 12:39)
rammylad, ramsbottom (26/11/2007 at 12:53)
Create some equality on the roads and the council may start to get somewhere.
Rosie's mum (26/11/2007 at 13:05)
mamvcivm, Manchester (26/11/2007 at 13:28)
Err, HELLO, I thought that's what the signs say!!!!!
Beaufort said, "Please let's fine all these bus drivers who consistently go through red lights."
Anti-congestion savvy areas would give buses priority at traffic lights...
tram vet (26/11/2007 at 14:35)
get the fella to park on cheetham hill road and he will take more than 200k in the first week!
double, triple and quadruple parking is not uncommon and, if you have a cdrom hanging from your rear view mirror, you seem to be able to get away with anything!
Harvey (26/11/2007 at 15:13)
Anyone driving in a bus lane outside of these time deserves to be punished.
As for buses getting priority at lights under a new scheme then fine. I have seen this in action in Medalin and it works. A sensor senses the bus and the light changes to green. However, in Manchester the drivers just go through on red - different scenario.
In Edinburgh something like eighty drivers were given three points for going through on red.
I'm not anti bus, just law abding and didn't like being knocked down.
Gloria (26/11/2007 at 15:32)
ace, manchester (26/11/2007 at 16:08)
Neil Stockport (26/11/2007 at 16:12)
The Bobelesque (26/11/2007 at 16:14)
andy ballington (26/11/2007 at 16:14)
If you were not to use a bus lane outside of times of operation during a driving test and the bus lane was clear it would result in a fail.
Henry Piggot-Smythe, Prestbury (26/11/2007 at 17:41)
I find it inconceivable that public transport should have priority over say, Rolls Royce and Bentley drivers without whom the public transport passengers would not have any employment to travel into the city for.
It's the occupants of these motor cars that should have priority for they contain many high powered executives and employers who create the wealth and jobs for Manchester and if hindered travelling for important business meetings and dinner engagements with financial investors and similar business executives it would have serious repercussions for the employment prospects of public transport travelers.
The poor would be even poorer with no employment to travel for but there would be plenty of these empty bus lanes to ease their hunger pains caused by empty pockets and empty larders.
Henderson P (26/11/2007 at 17:52)
I would much rather my staff who travel by bus got their before me so that they may tend to the business of the day. It might surprise you to know that I travel in by bus twice a week and see no shame in doing so.