MANCHESTER will take the government to court if it scraps the plan for a supercasino, we can reveal today.
The city council is prepared to seek a judicial review on the decision - causing the government political embarrassment by throwing into doubt plans for 16 smaller casinos around the country.
Manchester was chosen by an independent panel as the best site for Britain's first supercasino - beating bookies' favourites Blackpool and the Millennium Dome.
The locations were backed by the House of Commons, but rejected by the Lords by just three votes.
Tony Blair, who was then prime minister, vowed to `put right' the peers' decision.
But then Gordon Brown took over at No 10 and announced a review - led by Communities Secretary and Salford MP Hazel Blears - on whether there are better ways of regenerating east Manchester.
Mr Brown is known to be no fan of a major extension of gambling and is believed to have approved briefings earlier this year that supercasinos were `dead in the water'.
Yet earlier in the year, Mr Brown, when Chancellor, said on a visit to Chorlton: "I voted for it (Manchester's bid) and I want to see it go through. We have to resolve this."
Town hall chiefs believe they have won the argument by proving that only a supercasino would create thousands of jobs for local people at no cost to the public purse.
Strategy
But they privately fear Ms Blears' review, due in the next few days, could still give Mr Brown an excuse to scrap the project.
The M.E.N. understands that if this happens, council bosses will challenge it through the courts.
The council would accept any alternative strategy put forward by Ms Blears' report - and not take the legal action - if it created a similar number of jobs for local people. But they are not convinced one exists.
An independent report found the supercasino complex would create 3,500 jobs, with 3,300 available to low-skilled workers from the east Manchester area.
No alternative use - such as shops, housing, or office development - would create more than 450 jobs for local people, it found.
Ms Blears told the M.E.N. in June, when she was running for the deputy Labour leadership, that the supercasino should go ahead.
"It will provide jobs and regeneration and we should just get on with it," she said.
But we can reveal that Ms Blears' team has not even visited the proposed supercasino site in the deprived area of Beswick. Council chief executive Sir Howard Bernstein said an `open ended' invitation for Ms Blears to visit the site had not been taken up. And he challenged the Blears team: "This development would create an extra £1bn in 10 years for the Manchester economy.
"The challenge for the government is to demonstrate, if that is wrong, just how it is wrong."
The government has given private assurances it wants to press ahead with the 16 smaller casinos.
It is understood Manchester would argue that doing so - while scrapping the supercasino - would breach the Gambling Act, which called for an even spread of new casinos.
It would also point out it never had the chance to fight for a small casino because it went for the supercasino licence instead.
Ms Blears was unavailable for comment today.
Read more on this story via the links on the right of this page.
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Tweet

Showing comments 1 to 21 and replies | View All
Princess_Pam, Crumpsall (21/11/2007 at 09:37)
WE should accept that Parliament threw out the proposals for new casinos and live with those we already have. Lets build a few new theatres instead.
ace, manchester (21/11/2007 at 10:16)
markyboy (21/11/2007 at 10:24)
why dont hey accept the fact that bottler brown doesnt want m/c to have the casino, large chunks of the populace dont want it and lastly a local mp in charge of the review has not been bothered to review the plans.
forget it and move on instead of unnecessary legal action and think of other ways to promote m/ rather than that of a gamblers paradise.
Mr Angry, Bury (21/11/2007 at 10:31)
Mr Angry, Bury (21/11/2007 at 11:59)
They go through a kind of de-humanising process where they completely become detatched from the real world, start living in a sort of little bubble surrounded by others of their ilk and spout complete b******* which any normal person sees straight through.
As they have become part of this political class, they simply run the council/government/company to suit themselves and not for the benefit of the electorate/customers
Get rid of them all NOW
Mark, South Manchester (21/11/2007 at 12:08)
But what is really annoying, is the "hypocrisy" of Gordon Brown. He's allowing the 16 other casinos to go ahead, he's doing nothing about internet gambling & nothing about any other form of gambling! So Gordon Brown's scrapping of the supercasino, is simply to prove he's no Tony Blair and to please the Daily Mail & Telegraph.
This wouldn't be happening if London had lost that House of Lords vote by 3 votes!
ace, manchester (21/11/2007 at 12:17)
Ive been saying this for years,But as usual we have what i call voting sheep in britain they seem to forget the garbage they put up with when they go to vote? they vote the same load of clowns time after time.MCC has been labour for decades and the people of manchester still vote them back into power? It still amazes me how this load keep getting back into control ....
BlueRover, Bury (21/11/2007 at 12:19)
If a SuperCasino is to be built, then it should be in Blackpool which badly needs regeneration. A casino here would fit better with holidaymakers and day-trippers who want to indulge in a bit of gambling.
The Commonwealth Games project was supposed to regenerate East Manchester. What impact has that had? And what long-term impact do Mssrs Leese & Co think a Supercasino will have on the area?
reppick, salford (21/11/2007 at 12:46)
Black Sabbath (21/11/2007 at 13:17)
Moog (21/11/2007 at 13:46)
ace, manchester (21/11/2007 at 13:52)
Ash (21/11/2007 at 14:46)
A Supercasino DOES NOT MEAN everybody is going to turn into compuslive degenerate gamblers overnight!
Black Flag (21/11/2007 at 15:14)
I can now go out for a night out on my own terms and get a taxi home with ease as there are no longer huge queues due to everybody being thrown out of venues at the same time.
The Bobelesque (21/11/2007 at 16:14)
I assume from your comments that you do not live near licenced premises - with all the nocturnal disturbance that that involves.
I say introduce land tax and birchings to sort out the matter.
Tameside Eye, Tameside (21/11/2007 at 16:20)
As for vested interests Mick Hucknall is a major donor to the Labour party and has donated well over £80k over the past few five or so years. The ginger love monkey also has a 17% share of Ask Developments who also donated £5k to the Labour Party as reported by the MEN a few years back when a tender was put out for the Super Casino. What does that tell you?
I would look more deeply into James Purnell and Tom Pendry - both good friends - it would be interesting to see how they voted for or against Super Casinos.
chipbutty (21/11/2007 at 16:21)
Beaufort (21/11/2007 at 16:34)
I am not too keen on gambling these dyas. Add up all of the numbers on a roulette wheel and they come to 666. Doesn't that tell you something?
ace, manchester (21/11/2007 at 16:35)
Tell that to the hospitals and emergency services that have to deal with all the problems that go with the 24/7 drinking in britain..The problem with the british we are like babies we cannot drink in moderation when we drink we drink until we cannot stand and cause the services problems. Ive been all over europe Etc and never seen so many people causing problems like we have in britain. we are not ready for 24/7 drinking.
Black Flag (21/11/2007 at 19:06)
That may be true in your case Ace, but I'm more than capable of having a drink without causing anybody else a problem.
Timberman, MANCHESTER (22/11/2007 at 12:17)
Don't hold your breath waiting for an answer.
TTFN