COUNCILS will be given the power to introduce pilot schemes to charge households for the amount of rubbish they throw away.
Bin searches and on-the-spot fines for those who fail to recycle will be able to be used.
But it it is not clear at this stage whether councils in Greater Manchester will be taking up the option.
Manchester city council revealed earlier this month that it was considering carrying out bin searches.
On-the-spot fines of £100 could be dished out to those found not to be recycling. Repeat offenders could face criminal prosecutions and be hit with £1,000 penalties.
The proposals come after the city was criticised for increasing recycling by only one per cent in the past year, the third worst rate in Greater Manchester
Out of the nine other authorities, only one said it was considering similar action.
Bolton, Wigan, Tameside, Oldham and Stockport said they had no plans to impose fines and a spokesman for Salford council said its focus was to `work with residents'.
Rochdale council said they would consider fines `but only as a last resort'.
Bury and Trafford councils were unavailable for comment.
However, it would appear that unless there is a dramatic rise in recycling rates, they may have no choice.
The Commons Public Accounts Committee has warned that unless there is a significant increase in recycling, taxpayers face EU fines of £180m a year.
Britain has traditionally got rid of rubbish in landfill sites, but in 1999 the EU set targets to slash the amount of biodegradable waste sent totips, where it poses a health hazard.
The chairman of the accounts committee, Tory MP Edward Leigh, said: "If Britain misses these targets, taxpayers will have to stump up the money to pay a huge fine to the European Commission.
"The government must now take the tough decisions and practical steps needed to promote large-scale recycling.
"It will involve giving members of the public clear guidance on what they can and cannot put into their recycling bins."
Mr Leigh said waste treatment centres would be key to cutting the country's reliance on land-based tips.
He said: "The alternative is a never-ending search for more holes in which to bury our rubbish mountain."
Brussels took action in 1999 because biodegradable materials such as food, vegetation and paper generate methane to the soil and water which can be harmful.
The duty to cut the amount of food, vegetation and paper going to landfill falls on the 388 local authorities in England.
Bu the accounts committee said: "There has been little collaboration between local authorities and only six of the 25 largest waste disposal authorities were confident of meeting the 2010 target."
Liberal Democrat Coun John Cameron, from the Greater Manchester Waste Disposal Authority, said: "Most people are very keen and willing to recycle, but the city council must make this easier."
Tweet
New powers in war on waste
October 30, 2007

Showing comments 1 to 25 and replies | View All
AH, Manchester (30/10/2007 at 12:02)
Simon B, www.manchestertolltax.com (30/10/2007 at 12:06)
and people will simply fly tip, dump in other peoples bins, and burn it them selves.
ian, Oldham (30/10/2007 at 12:06)
soon we will have to pay to drive into manchester, so whats next and where does it stop!!!
ace, manchester (30/10/2007 at 12:25)
alvinlwh (30/10/2007 at 12:27)
newtond50, manchester (30/10/2007 at 12:50)
Blip, Manchester (30/10/2007 at 13:07)
polkyb (30/10/2007 at 13:08)
I make the effort to take paper, bottles, etc. to tesco/sainsbury's/Asda when I go shopping, but, until I get a recycling bin, like the residents of Bury, I'm afraid all my rubbish will be going in the one bin.
better off red (30/10/2007 at 13:20)
charge companies for producing goods in extra packaging.
when I was young, we never recycled, instead we sent back our empties, all sweets were in paper wrappers and not plastic.
it's time the companies were made to pay for their own actions, and not the people.
Mike S, Manchester (30/10/2007 at 13:32)
I would only agree to this if my council tax bill comes down by this amount. I refuse to pay twice for the same service.
mylifeinthemafia (30/10/2007 at 13:35)
Trudy, Bolton (30/10/2007 at 13:39)
hotplate, stockport (30/10/2007 at 13:41)
Compo, Wythenshawe (30/10/2007 at 14:02)
Octavius Tinsworth Ace (30/10/2007 at 14:04)
Unfortunately, it's another example of negative incentives. Instead of offering a positive incentive to recycle -- e.g. a rebate on your council tax -- councils are to penalize for not recycling. It's a similar situation with transport: instead of improving public transport so that it becomes an attractive and cost-efficient means of getting around, the government wants to make car travel so prohibitively expensive that it forces people to use poor-value, dirty and unsafe public transport. (I stop well short of blaming the current government or the Labour party in general because the previous Conservative administration was equally guilty of such negligence; in fact one could argue that privatization of so many national services under Thatcher sowed the seeds of this problem in the first place.)
Anthony, Accrington,Lancs (30/10/2007 at 14:21)
ralph milne was betta than ronaldo!! (30/10/2007 at 14:31)
jomov, Manchester (30/10/2007 at 14:35)
There is no way of stopping anyone from putting their rubbish in someone else's bin.
To put this scheme into place the Council would have to come up with solutions to problems like these!!
Chris, Irlam (30/10/2007 at 14:44)
Dave Pickup (30/10/2007 at 14:52)
Blip, Manchester (30/10/2007 at 15:34)
Mike, Manchester (30/10/2007 at 16:07)
JA0005 (30/10/2007 at 16:23)
Snare Drum, Ashton-under-Lyne (30/10/2007 at 17:49)
As for Mrs Thatcher, at least she got this country out of debt without going stupid on taxation. What has labour done? oh yes, got us back in debt by mega amounts and sold off our gold reserves and given us more new taxes than any other government in history.
little star, Cheshire (30/10/2007 at 18:34)